Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 01 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination HMS Warrior in Portsmouth, 2014. --Lewis Hulbert 19:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the cathedral of Oria --Livioandronico2013 17:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 17:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barn near Mulfingen -- Kreuzschnabel 17:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borgward Isabella Cabriolet with body by Deutsch -- Spurzem 17:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Livioandronico2013 17:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Special four door Borgward Isabella -- Spurzem 17:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Severe CA in the background but main object well depicted --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borgward Isabella at meeting in Bad Neuenahr, Germany -- Spurzem 17:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borgward Isabella from 1959 in front of the thermal bath in Bad Neuenahr -- Spurzem 17:42, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Choir of romanesque church St. Kunibert --Cccefalon 17:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient symbol of Oria --Livioandronico2013 17:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of King Tomislav of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia --Poco a poco 16:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moraca river, north of Podgorica, Montenegro --Poco a poco 16:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- Spurzem 18:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oenothera fruticosa ssp. glauca. Location, Tuinen Mien Ruys.
Famberhorst 15:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Very good. --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Oenothera fruticosa ssp. glauca. Location, Tuinen Mien Ruys.
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (Croix Boutelant), near road D 36, Savigné, Vienne, France. --JLPC 15:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine near a house, Civray, Vienne, France. --JLPC 15:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nikon D7000 with MC 3M-5CA mirror lense --Jacek Halicki 15:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not quite sharp (probably diffraction due to f/38!) and noisy. Insufficient quality for a studio shot. --Kreuzschnabel 16:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walasiewiczówny Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 15:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 15:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two Cariatids in Paris --Moroder 14:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, also the reflection of the sky in window. --Livioandronico2013 17:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reeth, Swaledale, seen from Grinton Lodge, looking towards Arkengarthdale --Kreuzschnabel 11:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 15:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Choir of St. Pantaleon --Cccefalon 10:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 11:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Portal of westwork of romanesque basilica St. Kunibert --Cccefalon 10:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Organ of romanesque basilica St. Kunibert --Cccefalon 10:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 11:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Choir of Basilica St. Kunibert --Cccefalon 10:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 11:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Observation tower and transmitter on Raichberg mountain, Albstadt-Onstmettingen Zollernalbkreis Germany --R-bitzer 07:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: Perspective issues, magenta CA, vignetting/underexposure, not sharp enough, noisy sky. --Cccefalon 08:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Knautia dipsacifolia. Location The Kruidhof.
Famberhorst 04:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC)QI imo.--ArildV 08:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Knautia dipsacifolia. Location The Kruidhof.
-
- Nomination Petroglyph in Campo Lameiro. Slab of oaks. Galicia -CL05 --Lmbuga 00:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality (but why don't you clone out the green leaf ?) --JLPC 15:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Answer: You're right. I've cloned out the leaf in other picture. I can clone out the leaf in this picture, but the leaf, being an oak leaf, shows the dimensions of the petroglyph. If you want I clone it out--Lmbuga 21:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A small house (Rebhüsli) in the vineyards near to Glottertal, built in 1872 --Ireas 21:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Strong red and green CA (left side of the building), otherwise QI.--ArildV 08:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thx AridlV, Done Ireas 10:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --ArildV 11:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Centro de Danza Ribera --The Photographer 20:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 08:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catamaran Fridolin in front of the Zeppelinmuseum, Friedrichshafen, district Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 08:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Ich würde das Bild ungefähr quadratisch beschneiden, so dass der Himmel etwa ein Drittel des Bildes einnimmt. --Berthold Werner 10:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Done Du hast recht, vielen Dank! --DKrieger 18:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Catamaran Fridolin in front of the Zeppelinmuseum, Friedrichshafen, district Bodenseekreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --DKrieger 08:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient plate in Oria --Livioandronico2013 07:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction and a regular crop are needed imo. --JLPC 16:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Done Thanks for review. --Livioandronico2013 01:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Better now. --JLPC 08:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Ancient plate in Oria --Livioandronico2013 07:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bourg-Saint-Bernard Church --Archaeodontosaurus 07:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion 2 dust spots; right side leaning in. --Cccefalon 07:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)* Done I struggled to see them :) --Archaeodontosaurus 08:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately the incline on the right side is still there. Also there is (from previous perspective correction) a small blank part from Top left to middle left. --Cccefalon 11:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Done It is possible that this time I corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus 12:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment IMHO QI, need a bit of sharpening maybe because excessive noise reduction --The Photographer 11:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in the inner courtyard, Louvre, Paris, France --XRay 03:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment No problem with the perspective distortion because it's taken from bellow, but the picture is tilted (see note). QI for me if you fix it--Lmbuga 10:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Fixed Thanks for your review. It's fixed now.--XRay 04:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)I'm afraid it is not in the "inner" courtyard, but in the "Napoleon" 's one... Anyway, I disagree about the persdpective distortion. It should be corrected IMO, because, even if taken from below, René is looking at us, and it is like if it were horizontaly taken (again, IMO), maybe like here ? Furthermore, do you know there is a special category for this series of sculptures ? And that the sculptor is known ? I've corrected the categorization.--Jebulon 15:48, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, I didn't knew. I've corrected the category at my other images of the famous men too.--XRay 16:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Nearly Fixed Last try. The image isn't really centered. Hopefully it's OK now.--XRay 16:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I think I understand your conversation. The image is much better. Support QI for me. I hope that Jebulon not being bother with my decision--Lmbuga 21:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Statue in the inner courtyard, Louvre, Paris, France --XRay 03:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Natural forest “Teppes Viertel” in the Wolbecker Tiergarten in Wolbeck, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Please remove the magenta CA top left --Cccefalon 06:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks for your review. It's fixed now.--XRay 04:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plakias Beach, Crete --Uoaei1 19:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Crop is quite thight IMO. --NorbertNagel 20:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately I cannot chage this --Uoaei1 05:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Some of the white parts blown too. Sorry. --Kreuzschnabel 04:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination --Famberhorst 15:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Deinanthe caerulea, a valuable plant in partial shade.
Famberhorst 15:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. But another crop would be possible. --XRay 04:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Done Thank you.
Famberhorst 05:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination --Famberhorst 15:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Deinanthe caerulea, a valuable plant in partial shade.
-
- Nomination Historic gas plant in Hamburg --M. Krafft 07:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs perspective correction. And can you bring up the shadows a bit? And a little tighter crop on the right to get rid of the leaves in the right corner--Generic1139 13:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Ok, good quality on the 3rd version --Generic1139 13:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skärholmens torg (square). Skärholmen, Stockholm. --ArildV 18:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Livioandronico2013 19:41, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The eagles fountain in the abbey of St. Florian (Upper Austria) --Isiwal 19:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Livioandronico2013 09:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Common ivy clinging on a London plane --Christian Ferrer 05:13, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:51, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vitra Slide Tower --Taxiarchos228 20:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Bad composition due to cropped head. --Mattbuck 20:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mirador Colomer --Taxiarchos228 20:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blurry top left. --Mattbuck 20:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portsmouth hoverport. Mattbuck 15:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 10:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christmas tree. Mattbuck 15:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 10:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Ho Chi Minh City from Bitexco Financial Tower, Vietnam --Poco a poco 11:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Livioandronico2013 09:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) at the Penguinarium in Loro Parque, Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife, Spain --AnatolyPm 11:54, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry,a few blurred. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blauer Natternkopf - Echium vulgare --Hockei 11:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:22, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village landscape in Zdanow (Lower Silesia in Poland) --Jar.ciurus 19:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed (white blossoms in foreground blown), and rather unsharp towards the edges. Pity, it’s a nice image. Any chance to rework this? --Kreuzschnabel 19:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 19:51, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sudecki lake in Bielawa --Jar.ciurus 18:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oversharpened, a lot of dustspots, no appropriate categories. I give you a try to enhance. --Cccefalon 18:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 19:51, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape at Sermamagny, France. --ComputerHotline 13:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline A bit contrasty, and are you awarew that cameras nowadays can take photographs with exposure less than 30 seconds? Mattbuck 19:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn’t fit into the long-name category then :-) Noisy and severe motion blur in trees, grass and clouds. Nice atmospheric image but not a QI. --Kreuzschnabel 03:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burschenschaftsdenkmal and Burschenhaus (today Berghotel Eisenach), seen from Wartburg castle --Cccefalon 09:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Nice and sharp, but feels a bit rotated clockwise. I'm also iffy about the white balance (too red?), and there seems to be some odd posterisation in the details. Mattbuck 19:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Done Though I think that a warm outlook of the image involves red tones, Ireduced the red channel. Also rotated the image some pixels. But about posterisation, I have to intervene: The minimal distance to the tower is 2,3 Kilometers and the hills are even 5 km from my position. You cannot expect miracles, even my lense has physical limitations and I think for a photo taken from that distance, it is good enough. --Cccefalon 19:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC) - Decline It's in the trees that I see posterisation, and it's fairly subtle, but definitely there. Mattbuck 19:51, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Burschenschaftsdenkmal and Burschenhaus (today Berghotel Eisenach), seen from Wartburg castle --Cccefalon 09:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BAE Systems Avro 146-RJ85 aircraft (OH-SAP, Pielinen) of Blue1 --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline DOF issues, not much is in focus. Distortion gives an odd bend to the nose. There is a lot of noise in the darker areas, under the wings and fuselage in particular. --Generic1139 21:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Almost entirely out of focus. Mattbuck 19:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parc Tecnològic del Vallès, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalunya --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Not very sharp, also bad composition - cropped thing on the left, too much empty space at the bottom. Potentially fixable. Mattbuck 19:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC) - Decline Not done Mattbuck 19:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Parc Tecnològic del Vallès, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalunya --Ralf Roletschek 20:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sierra de Collserola, Cerdanyola del Vallès --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Dust spots in sky. CCW tilt. Antenna are cropped off (that may just be a personal issue for me, not a problem with QI) The wire is... unfortunate. --Generic1139 21:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Not done, blur. Mattbuck 19:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two vaporetto's in Venice --AnatolyPm 13:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Two (fixable) problems imo : chromatic aberrations and prespective on the right side of the picture. --JLPC 17:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Done --AnatolyPm 11:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Better now. --JLPC 08:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Cologne_Germany_MediaPark-01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cologne, Germany: KölnTurm and Medis Park Forum --Cccefalon 07:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
the building in the foregreound is very sharp and good, but the main object (tower) isn't really. very strange. --Taxiarchos228 07:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment The hyperfocal distance is about 13 m (focussing distance 100 m / f8,0 / 60 mm) ... camera mounted on tripod ... when the foreground is sharp, the background is sharp too. It is what you get from ISO 200. In my opinion sharp enough for an object in a distance of 430 m --Cccefalon 10:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Oppose wrong focus, main object is not that sharp as is could be and should be --Taxiarchos228 05:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I disagree --Cccefalon 05:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment The sharpness of the tall tower is ok, given its distance. There is moiré, however, see note --Generic1139 14:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Reduced Moiré to a certain amount. However, this moiré pattern is also visible in reality. Removing it completly is like asking to remove the recflection of a building in a lake. Or like removing a rainbow. --Cccefalon 20:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is ok, as well as Moiré in full resolution (in lower resolutions it is worse). --Uoaei1 09:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer 11:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Lmbuga 11:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Generic1139 21:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Livioandronico2013 09:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Pterois_volitans_400.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Red lionfish (Pterois volitans) --Lewis Hulbert 23:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - The picture is noisy. In fact it was probably in low-light condition but 3200 iso is generally too high for QI. Waiting for other users review--Gormé 18:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment - Noise is acceptable for me, but there are a number of zombie pixels. Mattbuck 14:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Support Ok for me --Livioandronico2013 07:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Oppose- This cannot be QI for me until the zombie pixels are fixed. Mattbuck 23:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Have I not already dealt with them? Maybe I misunderstood what you meant by zombie pixel. --Lewis Hulbert 12:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies, you didn't leave a message. Fine then! Mattbuck 09:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Have I not already dealt with them? Maybe I misunderstood what you meant by zombie pixel. --Lewis Hulbert 12:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Mallorca_-_Puig_Major3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Majorca: Puig Major --Taxiarchos228 06:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy and left side even blurry, definitely wrong camera settings --Poco a poco 21:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
I can denoise it, and this are definitly not the wrong cam settings, are you kiding? --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, blue sky, best lighting and ISO 250 due to the fact that you have choosen a shutter speed of 1/1250. What for? The subject will sure not move. Furthermore, although ISO 250 is not that high the result is a relatively noisy picture. Poco a poco 18:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC) - Oppose per Diego --Christian Ferrer 11:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Main object is sharp enough, some blur in the corners is visible, but is not really disturbing. If the noise in the sky is somewhat reduced (please don't overdo that), I'll strike through the word "weak". -- Smial 12:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Diego --Livioandronico2013 13:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
File:University Park MMB «K1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination University Park. Mattbuck 06:52, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Oppose With this fog is QI? --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
yes fog can make very good quality images. --Christian Ferrer 17:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment I'm sorry Christian but I don't think in this way, I don't see anything that could be called QI. --Livioandronico2013 17:32, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Fog is not a disqualifier for QI, and I did shoot this because of the fog rather than in spite of. Mattbuck 19:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment For me yes,expect others say, but I stand by my position, with the fog nothing is clear. --Livioandronico2013 19:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC) - Support because the fog --Ralf Roletschek 08:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support the for gives a mystic scene. QI for me. --Steindy 18:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Kirjastosilta, Aurajoki ja Turun tuomiokirkko, kuvattuna Itäiseltä Rantakadulta, Turku, 8.12.2013.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The new pedestrian bridge Kirjastosilta (Library Bridge) over the Aura River and Turun tuomiokirkko (Turku Cathedral), Turku Finland. Makele-90 20:44, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion You have a very difficult image to get the white balance set properly with several different color temps on the artificial light. Was the sky really that color of brown? Can you adjust the white balance? --Generic1139 21:14, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
The sky was dull and brownish color is from the city lights. It really looked like that, I think. This is a jpg directly from the camera. I have also RAW, but dont have program to edit it. Makele-90 07:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment Such brownish sky is typical if street lighting is based mainly on sodium-vapor lamps and you have not absolutely clear sky. If you try to compensate this to get a neutral dark grey or even dark blue sky, all other colors in the image will look very strange. Reducing colour contrast can help a little bit. -- Smial 12:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Desaturating just yellow (or yellow and orange) helps a lot. At least the sky isn't glowing apocalyptic brown, while keeping the blue of the bridge and the natural green on the top of the cathedral --Generic1139 14:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Photographing snow at night is always hell, but this seems ok to me. Mattbuck 14:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
I disagree. I have a version here that by simply reducing the saturation in yellow/orange results in a more useful image. Letting this one go by as is like accepting the wrong color temp in a tungsten image - if there is a simple fix, it should be made. What's the best way to show you this version?. Upload a new version over the original file, which can then be reverted?--Generic1139 07:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC
Support --Ralf Roletschek 08:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Lörrach-Haagen_-_Schlossberghalle5.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lörrach-Haagen: Hall Schlossberg (detail) --Taxiarchos228 11:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp, more so on the letters on the far left. Overexposed, much of the white on the sign and some of the sky is blown out. Magenta in the tree line on the left. --Generic1139 14:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Not done Mattbuck 14:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
sorry, but the sign as main object is indeed sharp, the sky isn't blown out but white partially --Taxiarchos228 09:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Oppose As above. --Generic1139 05:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)you already had voted --Taxiarchos228 06:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- That was discussion, without the oppose tag. What counts votes, a bot, or a human? --Generic1139 21:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment to delete or to criticize the only vote that made Generic1139 It's disrespectful. Although I'm accustomed, I have to say it. It is clear that Generic1139 considers his first words a comment. Please, use {{Comment}} tag--Lmbuga 11:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- That was discussion, without the oppose tag. What counts votes, a bot, or a human? --Generic1139 21:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 08:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Tayassu tajacu.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Collared Peccary --Chrumps 23:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Decline It is a small resolution of a comparatively big animal. Nethertheless, the full resolution does not show sufficient sharpness. --Cccefalon 04:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support Picture is sharp and resolution is over 2Mpx --Jacek Halicki 12:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose somes areas have been overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:27, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Not QI for me. It is not easy to say why: Oversharpened IMO, overexposed (as Christian Ferrer), not good detail (as Cccefalon)--Lmbuga 01:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)