Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 30 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Tomb_of_King_Alfonso_XIII_of_Spain_in_Rome.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tomb of King Alfonso XIII of Spain in Rome --Livioandronico2013 17:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Needs vertical perspective corrections.--Jebulon 20:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)--Jebulon 21:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Jebulon Ops Thanks for review --Livioandronico2013 22:31, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Somebody can check? Jebulon is disappeared --Livioandronico2013 22:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Eh ! Oh ! I'm not alone as reviewer here, and I'm not obliged to review again.. Good now for QI.--Jebulon 21:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon (talk) 21:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:34_cours_Jean-Jaurès,_Pézenas,_Hérault.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Entrance of the 34 Cours Jean-Jaurès. Pézenas. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunate lighting imo Poco a poco 18:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Poco a poco, it's a good light, I presume that you speak rather about shadows --Christian Ferrer 07:21, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose As discussed, due to the shadows not a QI to me --Poco a poco 15:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    Good quality and nice contrast between shadows and nice light, I ask to discuss, thank you Diego --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Sorry. But for me this is not a good image. The shadows are very disturbing. -- Spurzem 21:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I like playing with light and shadow. No details lost in dark parts, probably slight overexposure in bright areas, but not disturbing. -- Smial 14:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Here I increased the contrast in a deliberate way :) --Christian Ferrer 16:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 07:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC) as smial
  •  Oppose I'm with the opposers in this case, I'm afraid.--Jebulon 20:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose For above --Livioandronico2013 12:44, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-04-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC
  •  Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred, lack of detail, jpeg artifacts Alvesgaspar 10:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 23:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014.06.21.-03-Mannheim Rheinau--Hufeisenklee-Widderchen.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Hufeisenklee-Widderchen - Zygaena transalpina --Hockei 18:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support QI for me--Holleday 12:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Seems a bit unnatural to me - oversharpened maybe? Hard to say, but for me this is not QI. --Mattbuck 18:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
     Support For me yes --Livioandronico2013 18:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurred, lack of detail. Alvesgaspar 10:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others--Lmbuga 23:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Support not perfect but enough for ql. --Steinsplitter 18:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
I think you made a mistake so I changed your vote. ;-) Thanks.--Hockei (talk) 07:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür11.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Noticable barrel distortion. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Not done --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    The left side quite clearly bends out. Taxiarchos has had 10 days to fix this. Mattbuck 23:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
here is n.th. to be fixed, we have a wideangle view --Taxiarchos228 09:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
That’s no excuse. Good wide-angle lenses don’t show any barrel distortion, for the others it’s easily fixed. --Kreuzschnabel 19:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
it isn´t an excuse, it`s my opinion, this point is not QI relevant --Taxiarchos228 19:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chromatic noise in shady areas. Improvable--Lmbuga 23:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Bettingen_-_Fernsehturm_St._Chrischona_-_Tag_der_offenen_Tür10.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination TV Tower St. Chrischona, view from operating pulpit --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
    Perspective/tilt issues. Mattbuck 16:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Perspective/tilt issues --Mattbuck 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support. QI for me. Please diskuss but not decline! -- Spurzem 22:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
    •  Comment Why should he? Discuss is set when a contradictory opinion comes up, that’s the normal prodecure as shown in the guidelines. The first reviewer has his own opinion about the image, which may be a clear deline, and he does not yet know you’ve got a different view of things. – As for the image,  Oppose it’s clearly tilted (look in full view at any vertical line, e.g. the panel or the steel structures hanging from the ceiling). The window framing is leaning for real of course. And it’s quite noisy, I wasn’t aware of the Nikon top range to have such problems at ISO 400. --Kreuzschnabel 20:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Kreuzschnabel: The window framing is leaning out because it the framing was contructed to be so. This appraisement without knowledge I am really sick of. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Das ist mir klar, deshalb habe ich ja geschrieben: "The window framing is leaning for real of course." --Kreuzschnabel 19:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment A bit of chromatic noise in shady areas. Improvable--Lmbuga 23:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)