Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 25 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:93_1360_Wutachtalbahn_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 93 1360 of the Wutach Valley Railway (originally 378.60 of the BBÖ) shunting at the station Zollhaus-Blumberg. --Llez 16:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 16:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
    I disagree, not really sharp and too much noise --Berthold Werner 16:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't know what happened here, but the image is full of strange artifacts, grainy, in some parts it looks like motion blur, but not everywhere, other parts are oversharpened. At ISO100 there should not be so much noise, so possibly overprocessed. -- Smial 20:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Smial. Looks as if detail loss from noise reduction has been compensated for by heavy sharpening: lots of artifacts all over the vehicle. Nice shot but not a QI due to lack of technical quality. --Kreuzschnabel 05:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Coyau 11:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Col du Souchet, La Grave, Frankrijk (2356 m.) 01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Col du Souchet, La Grave, Frankrijk (2356 m.) view Massif de la Meije.--
    Famberhorst 15:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
     Comment WB is too blue. --Kadellar 16:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    ✓ Done Correctie witbalans.--
    Famberhorst 17:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
    I didn't intend to make an "official" review, I can't decide about this one, but WB was wrong (thanks for reworking). I take it to CR so it can be assessed by someone else. --Kadellar 09:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
  • weak  Support, slight overexposure, somewhat low contrast in dark parts -- Smial 20:44, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

 Support -- Spurzem 20:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Coyau 11:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:University Park MMB «V2 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination UoNSU election night. Mattbuck 06:42, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  OpposeRed eye to be corrected first--Jebulon 08:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry. There are not only red eyes but also the lighting and the colours are not good for me. Further the person in front should be at the right side not in the middle of the picture. -- Spurzem 09:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsatisfying lighting, as for Spurzem. -- Smial 20:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Coyau 11:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Sèvres_-_Plâtre_-_Agathon_Léonard,_danseuse_n°15,_modèle_plâtre_002.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Plaster model for the Dance sculpture #15 by Agathon Léonard. --Coyau 17:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Noisy. --Moroder 23:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Not so bad, IMO. I need a third opinion.--Jebulon 14:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Noise could be somewhat better but is not really disturbing. In very low contrast areas noise is in any case more noticable than in contrasty surroundings. -- Smial 21:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Coyau 11:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)