Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 23 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Rima_rima_(Ranunculus_weberbaueri)_cerca_de_la_Punta_Unión,_Cordillera_Blanca_16.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rima rima (Ranunculus weberbaueri) near Punta Unión, Cordillera Blanca, Peru --Cbrescia 01:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose I realize these flowers are small, but I find the sharpness questionable and think it's worth a discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 19:13, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose sharpness Charlesjsharp 09:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noise, focus, general sharpness, CA. --Smial 12:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough --FlocciNivis 10:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:37, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Punjabi_woman_centenarian_at_Jandali,_district_Ludhiana,_Punjab_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Punjabi woman centenarian at Jandali, district Ludhiana, Punjab. --Satdeep Gill 04:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:41, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
    nose is not in focus --Charlesjsharp 08:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose True, even at 30%. I feel a little small opposing, but QIC is above all about technical matters. Let's see what others think. -- Ikan Kekek 07:12, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Charlesjsharp 09:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 09:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)