Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 21 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:14-01-10-tbh-002.jpg

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination ohne Blitz war das nicht machbar. --Ralf Roletschek 16:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 12:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senden,_Haus_Ruhr_--_2015_--_5200.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 06:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binnenhof,_The_Hague_-hu-1798.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Binnenhof, The Hague, seen from the main entrance northeast --Hubertl 02:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unnatural colored branches (CA?) on the left, a couple of dust spots on the sky (easy to fix). --Iifar 19:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC), No dust spot found, but color settings reprocessed. --Hubertl 19:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
    •  Info Notes added. --Iifar 05:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
      • OK with me now. --Iifar 11:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Something like dustspots cloned out. Anyway, it´s cleared now. --Hubertl 06:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The whole picture looks stretched in the horizontal direction, a probable effect of geometric correction. Plese look at the car and people (who look too fat). Is is easy to fix though. -- Alvesgaspar 09:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment ✓ Done, thanks for the hint, Alvesgaspar. --Hubertl 10:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Don't you think it is a bit overdone? -- Alvesgaspar 11:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Il Tevere September 2015-1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The River Tiber. One of the Quattro Fontane at the intersection of Via delle Quattro Fontane and Via del Quirinale in Rome -- Alvesgaspar 21:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment looks pixelated to me, don't it? --Carschten 20:50, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment -- I see no pixelation at all. Alvesgaspar 21:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
     Comment Why is this picture here at CR? --Hubertl 14:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support ok for me. --Hubertl 14:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For me too, obviously--Jebulon 23:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:AT_46784_Minoritenkirche,_Arcades_with_Epitaphs-20.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Minoriten church, side view of the Arcades at the Minoriten square (with Epitaphs), Vienna --Hubertl 07:25, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Certainly I do not demand absolute neutral white balance in such cases, but this is yet too yellowish. --Smial 10:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  CommentIt is exactly as it is in real. These are the only lights - exept one small floodlight for the belfrie - at this church in the night, these are no white, but jellow/orange bulbs. Have you ever been there? Of course not. Most of the lanterns around - like in Metastasiogasse - have the same bulbs with the same color, for preservation reasons of sites of historic interest. As I wrote at the other nominations: Light, color and WB is really as it is. Not easy to get, you won´t find nightpictures with good quality from this this scenery. --Hubertl 11:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Die Information, daß dort eingefärbtes Glühobst leuchtet, hätte vollkommen ausgereicht. --Smial 08:03, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Looking at the wall around the door and the other building on the right makes it quite clear that the WB is correct here. --Code 07:27, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Σπάρτακος 08:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Difficult lighting conditions and perspective a bit ackward (due to small focal distance) but overall quality is good enough -- Alvesgaspar 09:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:God_Ganesh_statue._01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination statue of gog ganesha in the Chinnamasta bhagwatiTemple. --Bijay chaurasia 14:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Maathavan 20:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is banding/posterisation in the upperleft part. Also too much rose in the sky (whitebalance ok?). Also some CA. --Cccefalon 09:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it can work for QI.--Jebulon 22:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I am surprised, Jebulon, that you don't encourage the young photographer to eliminate simple issues. On other days, you are much more picky on easy to fix problems. I hope, you are lenient to issues in my images next time, too. --Cccefalon 09:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 Comment comments over comments are as useless as personalization. I don't own the truth, but I just do only what I want.--Jebulon 23:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 19:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Slovenian_Railways_freight_train.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Slovenian railways freight train. Locomotive SŽ 363-002 --PetarM 08:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. I like the mirage from the heat separating the foreground from the background. However, please correct the green/magenta chromatic aberrations, and do not risk your life by taking photos on the tracks (even if using a telephoto lens). Dllu 08:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Erm, no one sees the strong magenta chromatic aberrations? --Cccefalon 09:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment If you read my review, you will see that I did in fact recommend fixing the green/magenta chromatic aberrations. Dllu 00:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Yes, I read your notice but I was surprised that no one else insisted that it should be corrected before the image is getting promoted. --Cccefalon 09:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Dllu how do you describe passion ? ✓ Done --PetarM 12:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)