Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 20 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_78.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree. Sensor pattern on the door. --Steindy 12:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Door and sky. This is getting tiresome. --Peulle 12:13, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
  • The camera was from 24.9. until 18.10.2019 at the Nikon-Service. Diagnosis (cost € 64.62): Camera and sensor in perfect condition. --Manfred Kuzel 13:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  • OK, that's good news. It means that all images shot before 18.10 are probably struggling with this problem, then?--Peulle 07:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_77.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Disturbing pattern in the sky. Sorry. --Ermell 06:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again? How many of these are there?--Peulle 12:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_75.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Pattern in the sky and the verticals need a correction. Sorry. --Ermell 06:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again? How many of these are there?--Peulle 12:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_76.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality --Llez 05:16, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Pattern in the sky and the verticals need to be corrected. Sorry. --Ermell 06:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again? How many of these are there?--Peulle 12:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_74.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Sky problems like the others. Sorry. --Ermell 06:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Again? How many of these are there?--Peulle 12:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Cappella_de_Santi_Innocenti_Santa_Maria_del_Carmine_Brescia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Holy Innocents chapel in the Santa Maria del Carmine church in Brescia. --Moroder 03:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry: No good reason for asymetric crop and perspective; plus: the whole picture looks stretched as if there were an error in aspect ratio: roses are not round and faces are elongated. --Axel Tschentscher 15:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 05:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The picture is unnaturally stretched and the lighting is extremely unfavorable. Too bad, but that's not a quality image. -- Spurzem 12:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Altare_della_Madonna_delle_Brine_angelo_di_destra_Santa_Maria_del_Carmine_Brescia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Right angel Madonna delle Brine altar in the Santa Maria del Carmine church in Brescia. --Moroder 03:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Not sharp. --Axel Tschentscher 15:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 05:29, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose No, this is definitely blurred, not just soft.--Peulle 12:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_83.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline  SupportGood quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Blotchy sky. --Tsungam 06:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Just delete all of them.--Peulle 12:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_85.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 04:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Pattern in the sky. Sorry. --Ermell 06:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 10:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --A.Savin 13:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannersdorf_Rochusberg_92.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Objekt auf dem Rochusberg in Mannersdorf an der March (Niederösterreich). --Manfred Kuzel 05:01, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Pattern in the sky. Sorry. --Ermell 06:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle 10:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ermell is right, sorry. --Steindy 23:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 00:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

File:2019_Zamek_w_Owieśnie_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Castle in Owiesno 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Number 2 without the car is better. -- Spurzem 06:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment If another photo is better, then it must be good.
  •  Support - Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 05:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Perfectly OK. -- Ikan Kekek 08:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The telephone line in the sky; the red car on the right - too many issues in composition for QI. These could have been overcome by moving in closer. --GRDN711 18:10, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 00:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)