Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 16 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Kurmukhi church, Azerbaijan.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kurmukhi church, Azerbaijan. --CuriousGolden 13:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
    I don't get it, what kind of panorama is this with half of it blocked but a church? please, let's discuss it --Poco a poco 21:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: It's not panorama and it's not supposed to be one, I didn't know what panorama meant when I first uploaded the picture last year. CuriousGolden 08:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice photo, however you want to classify it. -- Ikan Kekek 09:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The file should be renamed, it isn't a panorama. Sharpness should be better, composition too. EXIF data is missing. --XRay 16:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Renamed. CuriousGolden 10:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, --Steindy 09:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I go for  Neutral now, quality is fine but the crop strange (randomed?) to me. Poco a poco 11:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition. I share Poco's concern. The cut does not fit the description. Incomprehensibly, only the upper part of the church is shown. --Milseburg 13:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
    • @Milseburg: The church is on a large rock, therefore it's impossible to take a full picture of it without a drone. I had to climb another hill to be able to take an image of the upper part of the church. I've changed the description a bit to better match what the image is depicting. CuriousGolden 13:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
A bit more of the bottom is possible, see File:Albanian church in Gakh.JPG For this one I propose "Tower and roof of the Kurmukhi or Kürmük church in Qax region of Azerbaijan" as description.--Milseburg (talk) 13:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
@Milseburg: ✓ Done CuriousGolden 14:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrong lighting, the subject is in contre-jour. Alvesgaspar 20:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 10:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)