Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 13 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Amiens_France_Buildings-in-Rue-Motte-03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Amiens, France: Shop sign "Electricité" and street lantern at house 27 in Rue Motte --Cccefalon 05:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose - Lack of Focus. The image description is "Electricité shop sign and street lantern" and the lantern is definitely blurred. --Steindy 21:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ changed description --Cccefalon 13:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 13:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree with Steindy, the out of focus lantern is too disturbing. Also there are dust spots. Mattbuck 18:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I'm agree with Mattbuck--Lmbuga 23:42, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Main object is sharp, and I understand the intention, but the unsharp lantern kills the composition. -- Smial 20:52, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 21:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Stonawa, Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Church of Saint Mary Magdalene, Stonava. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 19:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
    Top is very unsharp. Mattbuck 22:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Put to Discussion for mentioned issues. --P e z i 11:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Tilted a little, top cross very unsharp, colors manipulated too visibly, distortion (the clock dial should be round, and not oval)--Jebulon 19:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as for Jebulon. Also CA. -- Smial 19:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-00-Tallinn-WLM-RalfR-03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tallin, Estonia, marketplace --Ralf Roletschek 16:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good Quality --Hubertl 19:44, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose distorted and partially unsharp; several chromatic aberrations --A.Savin 10:49, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose lacks sharpness --MB-one 13:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as for A.Savin, sorry. Doesn't Nikon software offer automatic lens correction? -- Smial 19:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 21:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-09-21_10-39-33_salle-mairie-belfort-PA00101139.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Inside the town hall of Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 17:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Support Good. --Florstein 08:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    Significant CA around the... thing... in the window on the left. --Mattbuck 21:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I see no significant CA but only a slight CA, which is less at this photo. Good enough. --Steindy 22:29, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unpleasant: yellowish IMO, Overexposed windows--Lmbuga 23:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as per Lmbuga. Yann 11:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above Alvesgaspar 21:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above.--Jebulon 21:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 21:12, 12 October 2014 (UTC)