Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 12 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Brügge_(B),_Sint-Janshospitaal_--_2018_--_8576.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sint-Janshospitaal, Bruges, Belgium --XRay 01:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Awkward composition. --MB-one 18:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. IMO the composition of the gables is good enough. --XRay 03:16, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, it is completely unclear what the photo is supposed to show. The cross on the left side of the picture does not stand out enough from the background, the pigeons are very small, the right gable is cut off and the back gable is blurred. I am really at a loss. --Smial 16:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:2018_-_Messe_du_soir_dans_le_Sanctuaires_de_Lourdes.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Evening Mass in the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes, Hautes-Pyrénées, Occitanie, France. --Moahim 09:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Perspective correction needed, the image looks oversharpened and there are lots of hot pixels all over the dark areas. Probably the image won't be fixable satisfyingly. --Basotxerri 14:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done I did what I could. --Moahim 10:17, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I stay neutral, I'd like to hear more opinions. --Basotxerri 18:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as much as i like the image, it doesn't fulfill the QI criteria: perspective issues, glowing edges, lens flare and posterization. --MB-one 10:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
  • The main reason of these problems - high ISO and wide aperture, but it was the only way to freeze the people. Thanks. --Moahim 10:16, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Masjid_near_Asaf-ud-daula_(Asfi_Mosque).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Considered as one of the most beautiful mosques in India, the Jama Masjid in Lucknow is truly a gorgeous sight. Built entirely in yellow sandstone, the masjid was constructed by Sultan Ahmed Shah in 1423. By User:Aryanmathurphotography --Satdeep Gill 18:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 02:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Overprocessed, oversharpened, oversaturated, CAs. Might be fixable. --Basotxerri 10:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Check the perspective, too. --Basotxerri 06:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri. --Smial 16:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-09-26_Prof._Dr._Jörn_Kruse_(WLP_Hamburg)_by_Sandro_Halank–2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Prof. Dr. Jörg Kruse (AfD), member of the Hamburg Parliament --Sandro Halank 15:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 21:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I want to know what others think. There are four things bothering me: 1. the crop is a bit tight for a portrait (least important thing). 2. There's chroma noise everywhere and best noticable in the background. 3. The focus is not on the eyes. 4. the soft boxes were mounted too high. --Granada 05:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  • I too noticed the chroma noise but other portraits have been promoted in CR with the same issue - I'm curious to see what the voters say here.--Peulle 18:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose ich muß Granada Recht geben, Augen unscharf, Blitze zu hoch und gleich hoch, dadurch Überbetonung vom Kinn und Augenlidern. --Ralf Roletschek 22:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Seems okay. GerifalteDelSabana 00:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Granada. Looks like a mugshot. --Smial 16:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-09-26_Jörg_Hamann_(WLP_Hamburg)_by_Sandro_Halank–2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jörg Hamann (CDU), member of the Hamburg Parliament --Sandro Halank 15:40, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 21:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Same as for the other nomination. --Granada 05:51, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Granada --Smial 16:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Norrskär_August_2018_10.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Norrskär, a historic steamship built 1910 and still in regular traffic in Stockholm archipelago. --ArildV 04:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  SupportGood quality. --Uoaei1 04:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image is much too bright. Look especially to the back of the steamer and the water. I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 15:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose purple CA --Trougnouf 10:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Look above. CA would be no problem for me. But the image is too bright. -- Spurzem 15:11, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Annoying sky, but it looks accurate to me. I've certainly seen days like that. -- Ikan Kekek 04:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disturbing purple fringes at the right. Noisy overall. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Why not just remove the CA? It's not difficult.--Peulle 10:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Sorry, I forgot this images. CA removed. I don't think the images is too bright.--ArildV 17:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment The fringes are not really gone. (Yes, I remembered the caches and loaded the latest version.) And the picture is still very noisy. (Rather surprising for a Nikon D500 at ISO 100, but the noise can be seen all over the image, not only in shadows. Perhaps not the best processing, no matter if in-camera or later.)
  •  Oppose too noisy in the shadows and sky seems burnt. --MB-one 08:36, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)