Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 06 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:16-08-31-Moskauer_Vorort_Riga-RR2_4358.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 09:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Aeou 09:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
  • If this is a photo of the bus (which is very likely, from what I can see), it should be categorized as such. --A.Savin 14:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 15:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Bonn-martinsbrunnen-detailansicht-2016-03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bonn, Martinsbrunnen. --AKirch-Bonn 14:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeSorry, no enough sharp --Ezarate 20:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I think blurring the background is a fair thing to do here. Composition is not the best but OK to pass QI. --King of Hearts 20:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - But the fountain is photographed in very poor light, so that the girl's face is barely visible, whereas the background is very bright. Is it legitimate to consider the light in somewhat extreme cases when judging at QIC? I think so, because it means that this is not a sufficiently good picture of the subject. So to me, it is not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 15:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)