Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 06 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Aqueduct in Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline

 SupportGood quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)  Oppose noisy, unsharp/blurred, dustspots, CAs... --Christian Ferrer 08:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Noisy, oversharpened --Generic1139 16:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose on grounds of having a completely meaningless filename. Mattbuck 21:01, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per all others, and not contrasted enough.--Jebulon 11:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 11:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

File:14-08-00-wlm-es-RalfR-07.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Aqueduct in Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia --Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noisy, unsharp/blurred, dustspots, CAs... --Christian Ferrer 08:14, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy, oversharpened --Generic1139 16:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose on grounds of having a completely meaningless filename. Mattbuck 21:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per all opposers, + lack of contrast .--Jebulon 19:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jebulon 19:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_barokowa_brama_09.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Baroque Gate on Kościelny Square in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 19:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support. QI -- Spurzem 13:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

* OpposeWhere is the gate? Who is that man ? Not accurate description.--Jebulon 20:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

  •  Support very good photo,here isn't the competition of quality descriptions. --Ralf Roletschek 07:50, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Jebulon is right for all images with this issue now on CR, it's on the guidelines: "Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description. This should include the Taxa naming for organisms." --Kadellar 09:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment. Es ist unglaublich, mit welchen Argumenten einwandfreie Fotos neuerdings abgeschmettert werden. Bewerten wir denn hier die Dateinamen oder die Bilder? -- Spurzem 12:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Außerdem steht im dateinamen, was es ist. Es muß nicht zwingend englisch sein. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
We judge a whole, please read the guidelines. In "Commons", ein "Bild" ist nicht nur ein Bild.--Jebulon 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Jebulon. A detailed description is important for QI. Yann 16:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
    • It is not only important, it is the rule !!--Jebulon 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Rules can be absurd. And than common sense is asked. -- Spurzem 09:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment I completed the descriptions. --Jacek Halicki 10:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now. Yann 10:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  SupportYou know why an accurate description is important ? Just because it is here the statue of my saint patron !😜--Jebulon 23:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 19:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)