Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 02 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Phatemy_Graves_at_Aswan_by_Hatem_Moushir_68.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Fatimid Cemetery in Aswan --Hatem Moushir 07:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 18:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too soft, I'm afraid. The building needs to be sharper.--Peulle 14:53, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
  • I add a new version with correction —Hatem Moushir 18:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose You went too far with the sharpness, not it looks grainy --Poco a poco 22:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 12:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Windmuehle_Charlotte_msu-7485.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Die Windmühle Charlotte --Matthias Süßen 01:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Horizon is obviously tilted. --Milseburg 11:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info thanks. i uploaded a new version --Matthias Süßen 14:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Alignment is now OK. Regarding our discussion on de:Diskussion:Leuchtturm Falshöft, I couldn't decide on my own. You value the surroundings of the mill. I'm not sure if the landscape is clear enough. --Milseburg 16:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 17:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 17:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)