Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 01 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Wallfahrtskirche_Maria_Gern_2022.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pilgrimage church Maria Gern in the near of Berchtesgaden, Bavaria, Germany --Milseburg 19:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  • I disagree, verticals are not straight. Need correction. --Nino Verde 10:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
     Comment Okay, I've made some perspective correction. --Milseburg 15:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. @Nino Verde: Why discuss? You could promote it right away. -- Jakubhal 05:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
    Hm, i wanted to promote this photo. May be i misclicked on wrong menu item, but i put default 'Good quality' and support. So, may be it was not me. Whatever, i still support this photo. --Nino Verde (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
@Nino Verde: Thank you, after changing your vote to support you forgot resetting "Discuss" to "Promotion". So it went to CR. --Milseburg 19:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Nice church, good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 16:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

File:EBACE_2023,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(EB237690-SR).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Eurocopter EC 135 HB-ZEN REGA/HUG hovering over Geneva Airport, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 10:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality: not sharp enough, sorry. --Peulle 10:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit tighter crop would be advantageous. The quality is good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry: blurred, too low sharpness for QI. --F. Riedelio 10:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough --Jakubhal 10:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If you crop the photo to a reasonable size, only 3 MPixels or less are left and neither resolution nor sharpness are sufficient for a suitable A4 printout. --Smial 11:54, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unsharp. --Hillopo2018 10:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --C messier 18:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Bhutia_Busty_Monastery_-_Darjeeling_-_30_-_Guru_Purnima.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Monks playing trumpets during Guru Purnima celebrations at the Bhutia Busty Monastery in Darjeeling --Sumitsurai 18:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Slightly underexposed but IMO Good quality. --Terragio67 21:36, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark--Charlesjsharp 09:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
    Charlesjsharp, have increased exposure. Can you please check now? (the thumbnail here though is showing the old image. You will get the new one in the image page.) --Sumitsurai 11:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I found the first version a bit too dark as well, but now it is an excellent picture. --Kritzolina 08:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support For the new version --Jakubhal 16:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Truncated objects and distrurbing hand in the lower right corner. --F. Riedelio 10:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose hand lower right Charlesjsharp 08:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. For an image taken at ISO100, I find the result surprisingly noisy. This might have been amplified by the slight over-sharpening. Also, I would have done the brightening a bit less. Nevertheless, the quality is enough for an usable A4 print. --Smial 12:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Γαλαξίδι_2174.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Old house in Galaxidi. --C messier 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Mostly good, but can you reduce the noise? --Mike Peel 19:47, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This should be a quick fix, but no response from the creator here, could support if tweaked. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
    vertical lines are a bit off - fixable? --Grunpfnul 09:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support The perspective is ok here. It is a bit noisy, but acceptable to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable to me as well --Kritzolina 08:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 21:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 10:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Don't see disturbing(!) noise. It's better to have light grain in near-monochrome areas of the image than excessive noise reduction that often results in a LEGO plastic-like appearance. --Smial 12:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Portrait_of_Paul-Eugène_Milliet_-_Vincent_Van_Gogh.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Portrait of Paul-Eugène Milliet - Vincent Van Gogh --GoldenArtists 09:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose no flash used, but uneven light --Charlesjsharp 09:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
It is the light of the museum, thank you.--GoldenArtists 13:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Issue with the lighting has been fixed, I think it looks good now. ReneeWrites 15:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now. --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 17:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)