Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 29 2016
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Bad Gleichenberg --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion It touches my romantic soul. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmhouse Huberhof in Riegersburg --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Enjoyable the corresponding color of the sky in the door and the shutters. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave lantern at the Cemeterie of Traunkirchen --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion All perfect, everything fits. And good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window Jesus Christ and the children at the Lutheran church of Gmunden --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window David playing the harp at the Lutheran church of Gmunden --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr schön und perfekt. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New railway bridge of the Koralmbahn across the Drava next to Stein im Jauntal, Sankt Kanzian, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 03:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New railway bridge of the Koralmbahn across the Drava next to Stein im Jauntal, Sankt Kanzian, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. (Was ist das, was da drauf hängt?) --Haeferl 03:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Hab mich das auch schon gefragt. -- Johann Jaritz 03:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New railway bridge of the Koralmbahn across the Drava next to Stein im Jauntal, Sankt Kanzian, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Haeferl 03:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway bridge across the Drava at Kleindorf II near Stein im Jauntal, Sankt Kanzian, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Not all sharp in the foreground (unsharp background is completely understandable), but a good picture. -- Ikan Kekek 02:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway bridge across the Drava at Kleindorf II near Stein im Jauntal, Sankt Kanzian, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice reflections in this one. -- Ikan Kekek 02:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Observation tower on Smrk --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Karkonosze, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Nikhilb239 01:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plastic polar bear with LED lights. --W.carter 22:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Cute, but what's the streak coming out of its rear end? -- Ikan Kekek 23:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
It's the electric cord, it does not run on batteries. W.carter 23:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I see. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel) By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 21:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel) By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 21:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars "Oehlberg". Located in Pillersdorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel) By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 21:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bronze Horseman monument of Peter the Great (late afternoon), Senate Square, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Godot13 20:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castillo San Felipe del Morro Lighthouse, Old San Juan. --Godot13 20:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1, a clear natural blue sky, good composition --Michielverbeek 22:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Recklinghausen-NRW, sculpture --Michielverbeek 19:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmund-NRW, the H-Bahn (stop Technogiezentrum) --Michielverbeek 19:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:40, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wewer-NRW, church --Michielverbeek 19:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 20:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colosseum in Rome seen from the Palatine Hill --Rabax63 19:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Insufficient quality: too soft. Also the category is wrong. --Peulle 19:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Cat. fixed. --Rabax63
-
- Nomination Central part of Magdeburg lift bridge, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. --Ajepbah 17:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition --Michielverbeek 19:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Lady in her Bath, by François Clouet (c.1571). National Gallery of Art, Washington. -- Alvesgaspar 17:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Slaunger 20:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Anne altarpiece, by Gerard David (c.1460-1523). National Gallery of Art, Washington. -- Alvesgaspar 17:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main facade of the Church of St. Wenceslas, Prague (detail). -- Alvesgaspar 17:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main facade of the Church of St. Wenceslas, Prague (detail). -- Alvesgaspar 17:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel near Altastenberg, Sauerland --Milseburg 16:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old church in Altastenberg, Sauerland --Milseburg 16:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New church in Altastenberg, Sauerland --Milseburg 16:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Euphorbia canariensis, Barranco de Fataga, Gran Canaria --Llez 16:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. --Famberhorst 18:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Barn near the house on the mountain path.
--Famberhorst 16:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Barn near the house on the mountain path.
-
- Nomination Mountain walk from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Waterfall above Lake Covel.
--Famberhorst 16:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain walk from Pejo to Lago Covel (1,839 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). Waterfall above Lake Covel.
-
- Nomination Walking around Lago di Pian Palù (1800 m). in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy). Tunnel is the path to the lake.
--Famberhorst 16:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 16:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking around Lago di Pian Palù (1800 m). in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy). Tunnel is the path to the lake.
-
- Nomination Rynok Square in Lviv, Ukraine — Діана Масляник 15:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, too many CAs --Llez 16:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mittivakkat nunatak seen from the South --Clemens Stockner 15:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glacier mouth of Mittivakkat --Clemens Stockner 15:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glacier mouth of Mittivakkat --Clemens Stockner 15:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hann glacier at Johan Petersens Fjord, South East Greenland --Clemens Stockner 15:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful photo in a cold landscape. Person on the photo shows how large things are --Michielverbeek 20:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palazzo dello Schiantarelli in Naples. --Moroder 14:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Woodcarved Madonna in the Museo di Capodimonte in Naples. Fresco by Salvatore Giusti (1773–1845) --Moroder 13:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
OpposeInsufficient quality: sorry, but it doesn't look quite sharp, the DoF is shallow, leaving several parts (such as the hand and child's foot) out of focus. --Peulle 13:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Imo the relevant parts of the image are the faces --Moroder 14:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Comment Those aren't sharp either; looks like camera motion blur on the Madonna's mouth.--Peulle 16:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination--Moroder 19:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old City of Jerusalem --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glasgow International Airport --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Glasgow International Airport --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boeing 757 TF-FIU of Icelandair at Glasgow International Airport --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, although I disagree with the composition choice of cutting the wings. --Peulle 13:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Israeli settlement in the West Bank near Za'atara --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not focused enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 22:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marble statue of Onfale by Tommaso Solari (1820 - 1897) in the Museo di Capodimonte in Naples. Fresco by Salvatore Giusti (1773–1845) --Moroder 11:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Lower right corner is unsharp, but good quality, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 11:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African janana (Actophilornis africanus) juvenile, Kenya --Charlesjsharp 10:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Not the clearest, and I think the long finger is really a stick, but I can see every part of the bird and it's a good composition. I'm not sure about your African paradise-flycatcher pictures and will leave them to someone else's judgment. -- Ikan Kekek 11:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Long finger/stick? This bird has the hugest feet you've ever seen. It's sometimes called the Jesus Bird because it appears to walk on the water. Charlesjsharp 12:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry; I will try to ask you more questions when I have them and make fewer assertions when I have no way of being sure. -- Ikan Kekek 12:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African paradise-flycatcher (Terpsiphone viridis), Kenya --Charlesjsharp 10:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arrow-marked babbler (Turdoides jardineii), Kenya --Charlesjsharp 10:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion You might decrease the noise in the tail, but this is a QI, regardless. -- Ikan Kekek 11:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-headed weaver (Ploceus cucullatus) male nest building, Uganda --Charlesjsharp 10:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Great capture. Too bad his back has motion blur, because otherwise, this could be a good FP nom. -- Ikan Kekek 11:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm tempted to nominate it anyway as FP. Charlesjsharp 12:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
And I just might vote for it, anyway (no guarantee, but I'd consider it). -- Ikan Kekek 12:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side altar in the Catholic parish church of St. Martin in Weismain in Upper Franconia --Ermell 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altar in the Catholic parish church of St. Martin in Weismain in Upper Franconia --Ermell 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Catholic parish church of St. Martin in Weismain in Upper Franconia --Ermell 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Catholic parish church of St. Martin in Weismain in Upper Franconia --Ermell 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pucará of Chiu Chiu, Chile --Poco a poco 06:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Parts are unsharp, but that's the artist's choice. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Office, Chile --Poco a poco 06:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion ¡Caramba! Muy bien hecho. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cerros Pintados, Pampa del Tamarugal, Chile --Poco a poco 06:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion ¡Chévere! Bien hecho, Diego. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chuquicamata town, Calama, Chile --Poco a poco 06:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nico Steinbach (* 1984 in Bitburg), deutscher Politiker (SPD]), MdL rheinland-pfälzischer Landtag. --Steschke 06:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marlies Kohnle-Gros (* 1956 in Dornstadt), deutsche Politikerin (CDU), MdL Rheinland-Pfälzischer Landtag. --Steschke 06:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The crop is too tight IMHO, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 09:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC) @Poco a poco: better? --Steschke 13:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Indeed --Poco a poco 13:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bettina Brück (* 1967 in Hermeskeil, deutsche Politikerin (SPD), MdL rheinland-pfälzischer Landtag. --Steschke 06:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Michael Hüttner (* 1959 in Oberwesel-Dellhofen), deutscher Politiker (SPD]), MdLrheinland-pfälzischer Landtag. --Steschke 06:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sentiero Botanico path from Cogolo to Peio Paese.
--Famberhorst 06:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Sentiero Botanico path from Cogolo to Peio Paese.
-
- Nomination Recreated houses of the Guanches, Mundo Aborigen, Gran Canaria --Llez 06:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alissa White-Gluz of Arch Enemy - Wacken Open Air Press Room 2016. By User:Fotandi --Achim Raschka 06:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:03, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch Enemy; RheinRiot Köln 2016. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 06:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --Poco a poco 09:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Festivalgelände Wasteland - Wacken Open Air 2016. By User:Fotandi --Achim Raschka 06:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Smial 10:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salone Capodimonte in Naples by Salvatore Giusti (1773–1845) --Moroder 06:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walk through the Het Katlijker Schar.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Pretty tree, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Walk through the Het Katlijker Schar.
-
- Nomination Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Hiking tour on the Delleboersterheide.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Catspoele Nature of It Fryske Gea in the Netherlands. Hiking tour on the Delleboersterheide.
-
- Nomination Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra) Kahramanmaraş - Turkey. --Zcebeci 05:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra) Kahramanmaraş - Turkey. --Zcebeci 05:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White wagtail (Motacilla alba) Kahramanmaraş - Turkey. --Zcebeci 05:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water Pipit (Anthus spinoletta) Kahramanmaraş - Turkey. --Zcebeci 05:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument of Wilhelm I of Germany on Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 02:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Self-portrait of Rembrandt at 63 (1659). National Gallery of Art, Washington. -- Alvesgaspar 23:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion I'm not sure about the left edge. Did you accidentally include a bit of the frame? Of course, there's nothing wrong with including the frame, but it's distracting for there to be only a bit of it on one side. -- Ikan Kekek 02:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Done You are quite right, thanks Alvesgaspar 13:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. Good quality for me now. -- Ikan Kekek 21:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Residence of the Guarnateme, Mundo Aborigen, Gran Canaria --Llez 16:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn This needs fixing for an apparent stitching error. Between the right side of the foreground and the middle, there is a line. To the right of that line, everything is clear, and to the left of it, things are overly blurred. Right now, as a result, this is not a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 01:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
You are right. I didn't notice that. For the unsharpness is not fixable,I withdraw my nomination --Llez 04:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). House on the mountain road.
--Famberhorst 16:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 23:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain walk from Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi (2015 m) in the Stelvio National Park (Italy). House on the mountain road.
-
- Nomination African dusky flycatcher (Muscicapa adusta), Uganda --Charlesjsharp 10:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good closeup of the bird. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African fish eagle (Haliaeetus vocifer), Uganda --Charlesjsharp 10:44, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion A lot of noise in the background, but the bird is sharp.--Famberhorst 16:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
for now. That looks like water on the lens. Anyway, I think you should clean it up for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Oppose
@Ikan Kekek: No, it was raining! Charlesjsharp 10:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry. Oppose rescinded. -- Ikan Kekek 11:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination All That Remains - Rock am Ring 2015; Philip Labonte, bw. By User:Fotandi --Achim Raschka 09:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not a bad idea to go with B&W here, but for me the pic is too heavily processed and grainy for a QI. Probably better in some artsy pic forum. Sorry. --W.carter 23:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wahmbeckerheide-NRW, chapel on a churchyard --Michielverbeek 07:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. Category added --A.Savin 10:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks --Michielverbeek 19:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Glasgow --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Suggest correction ov vertical lines and the personality warning template --Moroder 11:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Done --Ralf Roletschek 13:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 18:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Bus in Glasgow --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A wind generator in Tirumala.--Nikhilb239 01:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Not very sharp,btw also tilted, sorry --Moroder 16:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Twin WAG5 near Kazipet Junction.--Nikhilb239 01:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A WDM3B at Gonda Railway Station.--Nikhilb239 01:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Too hazy, no focus point --Hubertl 23:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb of Eugène Richard (1843-1925), Kings Cemetery, Geneva. --Yann 11:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion It is very difficult to read the inscription on the stone as well as see the ornamentation on it. Do you think you could bring up the contrast and the dark tones on the stone alone to improve this? W.carter 21:42, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Like this? Yann 00:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Right, now it is legible. QI. --W.carter 07:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Gemiliano church near Villanova Truschedu, Sardinia, Italy --Discanto 06:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp branch in upper left is too distracting. --Daniel Case 07:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abyaneh, Iran --Poco a poco 07:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC) *
Comment no better crop available? See bottom --Hubertl 09:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 11:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Can please somebody else have a look? 19:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. I`m sorry, Poco a poco. --Hubertl 07:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
No problem, no damage caused :) --Poco a poco 09:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Abyaneh, Iran --Poco a poco 07:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC) *
-
- Nomination Guga Madi at Village Aakadi, District Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
>Needs some perspective correction (see left side turret) Daniel Case 03:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC) - Decline
Not done in six days. Daniel Case 07:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Guga Madi at Village Aakadi, District Patiala. --Satdeep Gill 04:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Stuwwand van Lago del Careser. Bergtocht van parkeerplaats bij centrale Malga Mare naar Lago del Careser 02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Weir wall of Lago del Careser. Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago del Careser.
--Famberhorst 16:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Both sides leaning out --Poco a poco 18:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC) - Promotion
Support I think it's OK for QI - perspective is not that important for this particular motif --A.Savin 00:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
I disagree, if it would have been a "nice to have" I'd have promoted it anyhow. It is a dam and water is not unimportant in a dam. Due to the lack of perspective correction the water on the right is not leveled, it looks awkward. --Poco a poco 09:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Oppose
Comment
Done. Small correction. Thank you.--Famberhorst 16:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Much better, QI to me, I think now we all agree :) --Poco a poco 08:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Support - Nice edit. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted Peulle 11:29, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Festivalgelände_-_Wacken_Open_Air_2016_42.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Impression vom Wacken Open Air 2016. By User:Huhu Uet --Achim Raschka 17:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{o}} Not a supportable Licence. Use CC-BY-SA 4.0 instead, it´s a image, supported by WMDE that means the community --Hubertl 23:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Support I disagree. cc-by-sa 3.0 unported is absolutely fine. --Smial 00:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment I don't see this as a topis to discuss here - CC-by-sa 3.0 is a standard license for commons, therefore it is suitable for QI (and for the Festivalsommer project we can discuss a change to 4.0 as standard license at the next project workshop in January 2017) - so please discuss the picture -- Achim Raschka 05:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Support - The photo is fine. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ralf Roletschek 09:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment It is completely inappropriate to threaten potential users with immediate legal action. Just because it is a community-sponsored project, it should use CC-BY-SA-4.0 here. Thanks for your kind understanding, Wikipedia should be and remain as a friendly place! --Hubertl 10:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hubertl, where are those threatens?. I cannot follow you either regarding the license, 3.0 or 4.0 why is it so important? both are fine and I never check it. Poco a poco 10:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Poco a poco Contrary to most other photographers, who give user of the pictures exact indications, as they wish that they are called themselves, this is threatening with immediately legal steps. I think this is absolutely unacceptable, we have been discussing this for several years. This is the wording which I see not as a hint, but as a vicious threat:
- Any other use without name and licensedesignation or insert logos or watermarks is Abgemahnt (sic!) by applicable law without warning.
- It is unacceptable IMO, because these are pictures, which are supported by donations for Wikipedia. That means, due to the performance of each individual photographer here and the authors of Wikipedia.
- We already have some public and legal problems in Austria (on TV, with more than 300.000 viewers !!) with one of the photographers here (Steschke). It is unacceptable that a small group of people think that Wikimedia Commons can be used as a source of personell funding, regardless of the damage they cause with their actions, but for which all other Wikimedians have to stand. Three of those people are actually active here in QI. --Hubertl 23:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hubertl: As written above: the license is not a topic to discuss here - since it is a license suitable for commons and QIC. Nevertheless I discussed with the photographer, who never used legal actions and also is not willing to do so about this point and he took this part out of his template. The main reason for inclusion was the general practice of copyfraud in concert photogrpahy of some people, magazines ... to use available pictures and claim them as own work via watermark or logo. Concerniung CC-by-sa 3.0 vs. 4.0: I will not force anyone in the project to change the license but will discuss this in the next project workshop and hopefully find someone to explain the differences (maybe Raymond or superbass). -- Achim Raschka 08:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Poco a poco Contrary to most other photographers, who give user of the pictures exact indications, as they wish that they are called themselves, this is threatening with immediately legal steps. I think this is absolutely unacceptable, we have been discussing this for several years. This is the wording which I see not as a hint, but as a vicious threat:
Support The license is fine. The focus is a little soft, but the face is sharp enough.--Peulle 12:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Thank you, Achim, it is much more friendly and inviting now (as it should be!). It is in fact a very good picture, Frank made and I am happy that he is one of our photographer! But I want to make something clear: I do support legal actions in case of copy fraud, but only then, when the fraudant has got an information before. Most of the copy frauds are because of misunderstanding the rules. (as here, which costs me 1 minute to clear it]. Kindness to the world outside is the best Public Relation we can do - beside quality, of course! --Hubertl 15:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Hubertl 15:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Miramar 24022016.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A panoramic view of Miramar beach.--Nikhilb239 06:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Focus has ended up more on the sand just in front of the camera than on the people and objects, horizon it tilted and the folks and objects on the right side are distorted. It is also very hazy, maybe unavoiadble, but still not good. Sorry. --W.carter 21:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree. I find this picture OK as a beach panorama, though the haze is unfortunate. -- Ikan Kekek 03:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Support
Oppose - Sorry, I rescind the support and shouldn't have brought this here. You are right about the distortions on the right side, and I should have paid more attention to that. However, if those distortions were fixed, I would reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek 13:26, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with the opposers. The distortion of people is annoying. Alvesgaspar 18:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Hubertl 15:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Neurothemis fulvia 9590.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Neurothemis fulvia --Vengolis 01:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, I have to disagree --A.Savin 04:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I have to agree with A.Savin; the DoF is too shallow, leaving important areas like the eyes out of focus.--Peulle 18:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Could be an interesting and unusual depiction of the darter but the subject is out of focus. Alvesgaspar 18:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Hubertl 15:25, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Vergelegen Homestead, North wing.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Vergelegen - 18th century homestead of one of South Africa's better-known vineyards --Martinvl 10:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp. Sorry --A.Savin 12:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Support - That's really not bad. Photos that are way less sharp than this are constantly promoted at QIC. I mean, OK, the front door is slightly unsharp, but I don't think this is really that doubtful a case. -- Ikan Kekek 18:55, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment - The door handle has a fancy edge. What you are seeing is pixelation, not poor focus! Martinvl 08:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness is good, but there are several overexposed areas. Could you fix that? Yann 11:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Not razor sharp but good enough considering the large depth. Alvesgaspar 18:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →
Promoted --Peulle 19:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Imperial Russian Army 1904ic-p11r.png
[edit]- Nomination: Rank insignia of the Imperial Russian Army, Field marshal shoulder board 1909-1917 for officers of infantry, cavalry, 1st and 2nd Guard-Infantry-Division and Guard-Cavalry-Regiment. By User:Polygon v --Niklitov 23:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Review
Oppose Nice, but below minimum size requirement of 2MP.--Peulle 16:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Support 1.48 Megapixel is fine. Yann 12:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose No it isn't, according to the rules. We can change the rules but shouldn't make ad hoc exceptions to them at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:28, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per IK --A.Savin 13:31, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Good enough.--Ermell 08:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, 2 MPix is a hard limit.--Smial 10:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --PetarM 06:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Hubertl 15:24, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose --Milseburg 20:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 22:57, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:1909ossr11-p07r.png
[edit]- Nomination: Russian Empire. Zaurjad-praporshchik on Feldwebel position of Russian East-Siberian 11th riflemen regiment. By User:Polygon v --Niklitov 23:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Not for me; it's too small, lower than 2MP.--Peulle 16:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Question too small for what? --Hubertl 12:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose As for Peulle. --Smial 16:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ralf Roletschek 01:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Support 1.51 Megapixel is fine. Yann 10:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - We can choose to change the rules, but I don't think QIC is a good place to allow exceptions to rules, because most decisions are made by individuals and there are so many photos nominated here. -- Ikan Kekek 10:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per IK --A.Savin 13:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Support o.k. for me--Ermell 08:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --PetarM 16:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment - We're really going to have jury nullification of the rules here? In that case, shouldn't we change the rules? What clear guidelines do the jury nullifiers want to adopt? Start a thread in the appropriate place and link it here or on Commons Talk:Quality images candidates. -- Ikan Kekek 23:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment +1. If we choose which rules to follow, we might as well not have the QIC at all.--Peulle 23:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment I just collected all images (Bitmaps) in category QI below 2'000'000 Pixels. Possibly helpful in this discussion. --Smial 17:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- So in practice, there's been a lot of ignoring of the rule already. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- A number of the below 2Mpx are gifs, those are very hard to make in larger format and almost useless if they are too big since the wiki-software compresses and distorts them when viewed in smaller format. Maybe some similar case could be made for drawings such as these. Are they really more useful in larger size? Just a thought. W.carter 22:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with changing the rules. All I ask is two things: (1) Clear guidelines; (2) No jury nullification of rules in individual cases. I think that exceptions are fine at FPC, because every photo is voted on by a group of people, with a requirement of at least 7 support votes and a 2:1 ratio of supporting to opposing votes. Here, because decisions are usually made by a single person in each case, I think we should have clear, inflexible rules where that's possible. -- Ikan Kekek 22:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I am in complete agreement with Ikan Kekek: I would not mind a rule change, but I want clear rules and I want us to stick to them.--Peulle 22:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem with changing the rules. All I ask is two things: (1) Clear guidelines; (2) No jury nullification of rules in individual cases. I think that exceptions are fine at FPC, because every photo is voted on by a group of people, with a requirement of at least 7 support votes and a 2:1 ratio of supporting to opposing votes. Here, because decisions are usually made by a single person in each case, I think we should have clear, inflexible rules where that's possible. -- Ikan Kekek 22:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- A number of the below 2Mpx are gifs, those are very hard to make in larger format and almost useless if they are too big since the wiki-software compresses and distorts them when viewed in smaller format. Maybe some similar case could be made for drawings such as these. Are they really more useful in larger size? Just a thought. W.carter 22:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- So in practice, there's been a lot of ignoring of the rule already. -- Ikan Kekek 21:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose --Milseburg 20:14, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 22:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:1904ic-p11.png
[edit]- Nomination: Rank insignia of the Imperial Russian Army, Field marshal shoulder board 1909-1917 for officers of infantry, cavalry, 1st and 2nd Guard-Infantry-Division and Guard-Cavalry-Regiment. By User:Polygon v --Niklitov 23:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Not for me; it's too small, lower than 2MP.--Peulle 16:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Question too small for what? --Hubertl 12:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose As for Peulle. --Smial 16:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ralf Roletschek 01:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Support 1.48 Megapixel is fine. Yann 10:03, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - Too small under current rules. -- Ikan Kekek 10:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per IK --A.Savin 13:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Support No problem with the size.--Ermell 08:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --PetarM 16:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Milseburg 20:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 22:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:1911ossr11-p07.png
[edit]- Nomination: Russian Empire;Zaurjad-praporshchik on Feldwebel position of Russian East-Siberian 11th infantry regiment (shoulder straps of 1911-1917). By User:Polygon v --Niklitov 23:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Hubertl 07:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Not for me; it's too small, lower than 2MP.--Peulle 16:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Question too small for what? --Hubertl 12:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose As for Peulle. --Smial 16:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --Ralf Roletschek 01:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Support 1.51 Megapixel is fine. Yann 10:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - Too small under current rules. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per IK. Also, there is some overexposure on the CoA --A.Savin 13:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Size is o.k. for me --Ermell 08:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Support --PetarM 16:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Rules have to be changed first. --Milseburg 20:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 22:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_clock-warning.svg.png)
File:Canal_Grande_fondaco_dei_Turchi_Palazzo_Vendramin_Calergi_Venezia.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Palaces Palazzo Belloni Battagia, Fondaco del Megio and Fontego dei Turchi on the Canal Grande in Venice. --Moroder 12:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Weak
Oppose Insufficient quality. IMO unsharp at the left. --XRay 13:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I disagree --Moroder 03:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Comment It's a lovely composition, and I've certainly seen way less focused pictures get promoted to QI, but it could be a bit sharper in places. User:Moroder, why don't you play with sharpening just a little bit? -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for your comment. Frankly I'm not very familiar with sharpening besides that I believe that sharpening or size reduction can be done by anyone. Or is it better done on a RAW file? Cheers --Moroder 13:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Don't ask me! I know very little about technical matters. I just look and make recommendations. Perhaps someone else will give you a knowledgeable reply. -- Ikan Kekek 15:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment You should sharpen the image with your RAW file. It is not recommended to use a JPEG file for modifications if a RAW file exists. It's an easy task to sharpen the image a little bit. --XRay 18:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Support I tend to it. --Hubertl 18:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Left half is unsharp. Sometimes it is useful to set the AF point at an edge instead of the center (just my experience). No QI for me this way. Sorry --A.Savin 13:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Weak
Support - I wish Moroder had sharpened the photo, but I think that overall, it is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose A nice mood and a very good composition. But the depth of field should be larger. Why such large shutter speed and little F number? -- Alvesgaspar 18:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- F/8 is not so little for a panoramic take and you need 1/1000 s when you are on a boat. This image in fact is sharper than the average QIs --Moroder 23:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Maybe it would be worthwhile for you to familiarize yourself with how to sharpen a photo in post-processing, given that if you sharpened this photo or photos like this, it/they would have been promoted, instead of facing (a likely) decline. -- Ikan Kekek 00:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Peulle 19:44, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Reith_bei_Seefeld_-_Pfarrkirche_hl_Nikolaus_-_Fenster_St_Josef_-_Johannes_Obleitner.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Stained glass window of Parish Church Reith bei Seefeld, showing Saint Joseph. --Haeferl 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry. But this window is distorted too and needs perspective correction. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 22:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Per Spurzem. Easy to apply and the image gets much better. --Basotxerri 15:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Corrected. Yann 20:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Nice, that you want to help, Yann! But: You've stretched it so that it's now unnaturally wide. I will undo your correction (at this and the other pictures). I looked up from below, so I find the perspective okay and I will not correct it. If it does not become a QI, the world does not go down. Nice greetings, --Haeferl 20:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment I've just searched some images of the church on the web and it seems that the windows are really straight. This means that Yann's version is the right one and I would have accepted it. But how you wish, it's your image. --Basotxerri 21:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Natürlich sind die Fenster gerade, Basotxerri, aber wenn man von unten hinauf schaut, ergibt sich eine natürliche Verzerrung wie bei einem Turm, an dessen Fuß Du stehst und hinaufschaust. Aber wenn man es geraderichtet, kann man nicht einfach das Bild oben auseinanderziehen, da das Motiv dann insgesamt in die Breite gezogen ist, was in meinen Augen eine viel schlimmere Verzerrung darstellt als die stürzenden Linien. Ich schreibe das auf deutsch, weil ich mich offenbar auf englisch nicht verständlich ausdrücken kann, sorry. Liebe Grüße, --Haeferl 22:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment OK, ist klar. I respect this opinion but I personally think it would be better (and correct in the sense of QI) to fix this, sorry. Ebenfalls viele Grüsse :-) --Basotxerri 08:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Haeferl: Hallo, die Schwierigkeiten kenne ich aus eigener Erfahrung nur zu gut. Trotzdem: Die perspektivisch verzogenen Bilder stellen die Fenster nicht so gut dar, dass die Fotos als Qualitätsbilder ausgezeichnet werden sollten. Hättest Du nicht die Möglichkeit gehabt, aus etwas größerer Entfernung zu fotografieren? Und wenn Du nachträglich nicht nur oben auseinanderziehst, sondern unten zusammenschiebst, vielleicht auch etwas hochziehst, dürfte ein fast natürlicher Eindruck entstehen. Doch abgesehen davon sieht auch die schwarze Umgebung der Fenster nicht gut aus. Um die Wand und die Fensternische sichtbar zu machen, habe ich gelegentlich zweimal fotografiert: Fenster normal belichtet und separat die Wand (fast) normal belichtet, danach beide Bilder zusammengefügt. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 12:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Support - Respectfully, this image is good quality to me. I find this view fine. -- Ikan Kekek 11:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Perspective distortion. Yann 20:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Perspective must be corrected. --Llez 12:43, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Per Llez.--Ermell 08:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Of course, the geometry should be corrected. That is the usual (and appropriate imo) procedure with this kind of subject. Alvesgaspar 18:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose →
Declined --Hubertl 15:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)