Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 26 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Aix_en_Provence_Quatre-Dauphins.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fontaine-des-Quatre-Dauphins fountain and Place des-Quatre-Dauphins square in Aix-en-Provence. --Moroder 15:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Good resolution, but IMO unsharp. I don't know why, may be taken without tripod? --XRay 16:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  • I disagree. How can you make such unqualified comments. Look please at the signs far away you can still read. It was taken with a tripod and shutter delay --Moroder 17:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support imho it's typical soft light of dusk but at the street signs one can see that it's sharp (und immer die Ruhe bewahren!) --Berthold Werner 19:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Sharp enough for me, and I find the light pleasant. Large file, too. -- Ikan Kekek 19:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - per Berthold and Ikan. PumpkinSky 15:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 20:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Nordkirchen_mit_Park.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --PumpkinSky 11:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]