Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 23 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bronco_laying_down_LR.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bronco the Beagle laying down --PumpkinSky 02:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Important are the eyes. And they are sharp. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Disagree. Bad DoF, head of dog is almost entirely out of focus. --Lewis Hulbert 05:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 Comment More a case of him refusing to hold his head still. PumpkinSky 12:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  • You've gotta pay your model more to get him to sit still. :-) Sorry,  Oppose, not a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 23:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The whole head is out of focus.--Peulle 09:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Autumn_Leaves_1_NBG.png

[edit]

  • Nomination Autumn Leaves 1 NBG --PumpkinSky 00:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Great autumn colors. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too shallow DOF. --Lewis Hulbert 05:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lewis. This is a closeup view and nothing is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 23:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 09:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 19:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Arles_Montmajour_Pons_de_l'Orme.jpg

[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Basotxerri 09:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]