Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 22 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hangon_kirkko_keskellä_kaupunkia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hanko Church. By User:Maaritti Siitonen --Msaynevirta 13:07, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not enough detail --MB-one 11:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per MB-one.--Peulle 07:57, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat blueish WB, and perspective should be corrected, but not enough detail? It's about 15 MPixels and imo "good enough". --Smial 15:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question Why was this moved to CR? --GerifalteDelSabana 00:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Looks like there was a support vote from Smial. Edited to reflect this. Still it's declined now.--Peulle 22:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Ferdinandsbrücke_ca.1840.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ferdinandsbrücke ca.1840 --Dmottl 12:57, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a work of a wikimedia user. --C messier 13:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Ineligible for QI, and if it's promoted it must even be removed.--Peulle 07:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Per se ineligible per others. -- Ikan Kekek 13:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 15:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Finely_grounded_coffee_beans_in_white_bowl_with_intact_roasted_bean.png

[edit]

  • Nomination ~14g of finely grounded coffee beans in white bowl with intact roasted beanBowl diameter: 70mmI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Alorin --Shisma 21:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Problem with DoF, the bean is unsharp. --Basotxerri 13:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nominated on Nov 13, 2018, see there. --Basotxerri 13:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough for such a still object, IMO.--Peulle 07:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Stills like this should be sharper.--Ermell 08:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 15:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Winter_sunrise_over_downtown_Cape_Town_from_roof_of_Strand_South_hotel.jpg

[edit]

Fixed Daniel Case 05:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Where? A lot of "spots" seem to me to be the areas where previous dust-spot removal was actually too successful and lightened the underlying area. Do you see any of that? Daniel Case 19:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Many places in the upper part of the sky. They look like light dust spots. If the result of removing dust spots is to create light dust spot shapes, I think there must be a better way. -- Ikan Kekek 04:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, you can change the blend mode or use a different tool. Daniel Case 18:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed OK, I looked closely and saw a bunch of really light (but conventional) ones across the top. Daniel Case 04:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's better, but I still see a few a bit lower down (still in the sky). -- Ikan Kekek 06:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed again. Daniel Case 06:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still seeing some in the center-left portion of the sky near the building with the square windows. I'll withdraw my opposing vote, but keep looking for more. -- Ikan Kekek 11:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken care of those, at least the ones I could find. Daniel Case 03:05, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it looks like you took care of that. I'm seeing another issue, which is that there is ripply posterization in the photo. Can you smooth that out? -- Ikan Kekek 13:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination It's banding. After trying several different ways to tame it down, I have decided I must have overdone things at the raw stage and it would be best, if I want to get some sort of recognition for this, if I start over again at some point in the future. Daniel Case 17:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Ikan Kekek 11:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winter_view_of_typical_norwegian_hytte_(cabin)_coverd_in_snow_in_Rekdalsetra_area_-_Rekdal,_Vestnes,_Norway_2017-12-29.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Norwegian cabin in the Rekdalsetra (on the west coast of Norway). --Mænsard vokser 09:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Sorry, but there are quite some color fringes well visible. --Zinnmann 15:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree too. There are not only color fringes to fix, IMHO the subject is too small, too much "air" surrounding this nice "hytte". --Nerve net 17:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK 4 me.--Palauenc05 22:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA. Everything else fine. --Smial 09:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question Where's the CA? I'm not seeing it, even at full size. What am I missing? -- Ikan Kekek 10:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I marked two areas where it's easy to see. CA of green/purple type. --Smial 10:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks, but there's no way I could have seen that without prompting, and I'm still not positive I see it - maybe something really subtle. I realize many judges here are used to peering at photos very carefully to see the minutest CA, but I think if I have to look so hard at full size and still am not sure, it's a  Support vote. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Milseburg: I've reactivated the discussion as 8 days haven't passed yet. --Basotxerri 16:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
    • @Basotxerri: Hm? First CR-day was November 13th, the 8th day was November 20th. Today it is November 21st. Futher more you have to change Nomination into Discuss above to a reactivate the discussion. But I´m not in a hurry. --Milseburg 16:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 22:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)