Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 19 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Putrajaya_Malaysia_Perbadanan-Putrajaya-01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Putrajaya, Malaysia: Perbadanan Putrajaya (Putrajaya Corporation). Behind the gate: Accessway to the Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin Mosque --Cccefalon 05:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose sorry but the street with cars below the tree is too noisy and not sharp, also CA on the edge of the building, not a QI for me .--El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Putrajaya_Malaysia_Tuanku-Mizan-Zainal-Abidin-Mosque-06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Putrajaya, Malaysia: Access way with greenery to the Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin Mosque --Cccefalon 05:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose sorry but not sharp look at mens, not a QI for me .--El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good lighting and composition, sharp enough. -- Smial 11:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality and color. --Pokéfan95 04:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Medium69 01:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Putrajaya_Malaysia_Istana-Darul-Ehsan-01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Putrajaya, Malaysia: Istana Darul Ehsan. The Darul Ehsan Palace is one of the royal residences of the Sultan of Selangor. --Cccefalon 05:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose not sharp .--El Golli Mohamed 22:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Putrajaya_Malaysia_Ministry-of-Health-Training-Management-Division-01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Putrajaya, Malaysia: Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia, Bahagian Pengurusan Latihan (Ministry of Health, Training Management Division) --Cccefalon 05:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose sorry but not sharp look at the trees and the lower part, also CA on the edges of the building, not a QI for me .--El Golli Mohamed 22:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Yogyakarta_Indonesia_Colonial-houses-01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yogyakarta, Indonesia: A dutch style house near the level crossing at Yogyakarta Tugu Station. --Cccefalon 07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose insufficient quality not sharp. --El Golli Mohamed 22:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Yogyakarta_Indonesia_halte-Mangkubumi-1-02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Bus station sign at Mangkubumi 1 bus station. --Cccefalon 07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose bad composition tthe subject is too centred. --El Golli Mohamed 22:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Jakarta Indonesia Stesen-Cirebon-02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jakarta, Indonesia: CC 206 1331 at Cirebon Station. --Cccefalon 07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose chromatic noise in the roof, not a QI for me. --El Golli Mohamed 22:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he inserted his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:54, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Kuta_Bali_Indonesia_Protestant-Church-GKPB-Jemaaat-Bukit-Dua-06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kuta, Bali, Indonesia: Clock tower of the Protestant Church "GKPB Jemaaat Bukit Dua" in the Puja Mandala Complex --Cccefalon 07:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose not sharp look at the edge of the golden tower and a little perspective problem with the church. --El Golli Mohamed 22:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Obviously the act of revenge of a tunisian citizen who is not willing to learn from is photographic issues. Sad, that he wants to make battlefield out of QIC. Also a foul play as he insertzed his decline before the promote, making it look like it was him who first declined it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
  •  Support Good quality. --Medium69 11:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 15:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 15:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Monasterio_de_San_Francisco,_Santiago_de_Compostela,_España,_2015-09-23,_DD_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination St Franciscus Monastery, Santiago de Compostela, Spain --Poco a poco 10:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Barrel distortion, poor framing, blown sky. Alvesgaspar 16:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
    I nominated a similar picture some days ago and you also rejected affirming the same: barrel distortion. Would you be so kind and add a note with a line which should be straight but is barrel-distorted?. I see none. The comment about the framing is subjective, and you probably don't know that the spot is quite narrow to take a better photograph from the bottom, as was my intention. --Poco a poco 19:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK --XRay 07:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Do you mean that those flaws are OK for a QI or that they don't exist? Can you please elborate, XRay? -- Alvesgaspar 12:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure. I looked for other images and may be the column looks like a barrel itself. --XRay 12:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I've checked the image again. IMO the lines in the background aren't curved, only the column is curved. IMO the column itself looks like a barrel in real. --XRay 12:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Maybe they are curved. But there is a marked difference between the left and the righ part of the picture, which is not symemtrical: in the framing and in the shape of the columns. Alvesgaspar 22:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell 14:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 19:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is not by chance that this part of QIC is called Consensual Review. It is supposed to be the place where the merits and demerits of the candidate images are discussed. This is certainly not a poll or a popularity contest. If I'm wrong, or just too harsh in my reviews, please explain why. Alvesgaspar 22:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
  • I dont see barrel, framing is ok and the blown-out sky is in my eyes not so important. --Ralf Roletschek 23:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Medium69 11:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)