Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 17 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3127_block_of_4_stamps_(Mushrooms._Saffron_milk_cap_or_red_pine_mushroom_(Lactarius_deliciosus)).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lactarius deliciosus. --Matsievsky 05:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose below 2Mpx --Ezarate 21:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
     Info This vote is the result of a miscalculation. 1577*1862 Pixels are almost 2.9 MPx. The same is applicable to the other mushroom stamps. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:59, 11 November 2022 (UTC) you are right, change to CR Ezarate 16:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. BigDom 08:28, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small. "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media." - and I do demand at least 2000px on the shorter side. --Smial 08:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3126_block_of_4_stamps_(Mushrooms._Red-capped_scaber_stalk_(Leccinum_aurantiacum)).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Leccinum aurantiacum. --Matsievsky 05:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose below 2Mpx --Ezarate 21:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and more than big enough. BigDom 08:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small. "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media." - and I do demand at least 2000px on the shorter side. --Smial 08:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3125_block_of_4_stamps_(Mushrooms._Cep_or_penny_bun_(Boletus_edulis)).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Boletus edulis. --Matsievsky 05:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose below 2Mpx --Ezarate 21:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and more than big enough. BigDom 08:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small. "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media." - and I do demand at least 2000px on the shorter side. --Smial 08:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3124_block_of_4_stamps_(Mushrooms._Golden_chanterelle_or_girolle_(Cantharellus_cibarius)).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Cantharellus cibarius. --Matsievsky 05:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose below 2Mpx --Ezarate 21:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality and more than big enough. BigDom 08:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small. "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media." - and I do demand at least 2000px on the shorter side. --Smial 08:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:The_Soviet_Union_1964_CPA_3123_block_of_4_stamps_(Mushrooms._Slippery_jack_or_sticky_bun_(Suillus_luteus)).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Suillus luteus. --Matsievsky 05:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry: image size too small (< 4 Mpx). --F. Riedelio 09:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too small. "reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media." - and I do demand at least 2000px on the shorter side. --Smial 08:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Classic_Cars_in_Tenerife_2022_019.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ford P7b, XXI Clásica de Tenerife Internacional --Mike Peel 05:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Drow male 06:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark and reflections not good. Is it tilted? --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp, in addition, there is harsh light. --Sebring12Hrs (talk)
  •  Oppose Burnt highlights, unfortunate lighting, tilted. --Smial 10:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Katharina_von_Bora_Skulptur_001_2022_09_11.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Katharina von Bora sculpture in front of the community center (Katharina von Bora House) Friedelsheim
    --F. Riedelio 10:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose F2.8? Needed to blur the background to highlight the subject. --Charlesjsharp 11:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I deliberately chose aperture 2.8 to emphasize the subject through the blurred background.--F. Riedelio 06:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support F2.8 isn't a good choice for sharpness, but good for a blurry background. All in all good quality. --XRay 10:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good sharpness in the center, somewhat weak at the top and the bottom of the statue, but this is not visible if printed up to A4-Size. Tip: If you have enough time, leisure and a tripod available, try the en:Brenizer Method for such motifs. For static motifs, the effort is not that great. --Smial 09:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
  • @Smial: Thanks for the tip. I did not know this method yet. --F. Riedelio 13:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]