Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 15 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Μονή_Αρκαδίου_1925.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Arkadi monastery, Crete. --C messier 12:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The tourist in front of you just spoiled it, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 16:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I understand your reasoning, but I would like more opinions. --C messier 20:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Poco a poco. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose there are 4 people, 2 of whom are looking toward the camera taking selfies. Seven Pandas 21:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. The people are in this instance too distracting. Even if you sought to define the photo as "monastery with people taking selfies", the cropped person at the right margin spoils the photo. -- Ikan Kekek 09:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 14:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Tenzing_Norgay_Statue_from_the_back.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tenzing Norgay Statue from the back. --Syed07 15:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Tilted, perspective, spots in the sky. Should be fixable, though. --Basotxerri 09:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for now, per Baso. -- Ikan Kekek 09:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:পঞ্চরত্ন_গোবিন্দ_মন্দির_3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pancha Ratna Govinda Temple. By User:Abdulmominbd --RockyMasum 11:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 08:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CAs and barrel distortion to be fixed. --C messier 12:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong CA. But there is no barrel distortion, the building ist not straight. --Smial 22:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:41, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Calcutta_Boys'_School_Main_Campus_03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Calcutta Boys' School Main Campus --Subhrajyoti07 15:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Tilted and very tight crop. Maybe correctable. --Dirtsc 08:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 11:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment - The original photo was shot in this fashion, however I corrected the tilt and added some denoising. Even I recropped to keep only the marble plate in the frame. Given that the subject is the marble plate itself, maybe it can be considered. (missing signature)
  •  Support Slightly oversharpened and a bit of colour noise but IMO acceptable for a QI. A slight horizontal correction would improve the image. --Basotxerri 08:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good now. Thanks --Dirtsc 08:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Djemila7.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination English: Roman ruins, Territories and Monuments of the Antique Cuicul, Djemila, Setif Province, AlgeriaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018. By User:Mokhtarjet7 --Reda Kerbouche 14:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Syed07 15:49, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Unnatural light and CAs. --Tournasol7 15:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Tournasol --Michielverbeek 07:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed, oversaturated. Some CA. --Smial 22:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Car_ferry_Adda_on_Lake_Como_from_Menaggio_harbor.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Car ferry on Lake Como --Daniel Case 02:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm not so sure about the level of sharpness; let's bring it up for discussion.--Peulle 08:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too blurry--Ermell 07:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per ermell. Also oversaturated. --Smial 22:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:(কালী_প্রতিমার_অতিনিকট_চিত্র)_-_সুকান্ত_পার্ক_শিশু_উদ্যান_নারায়ানতলা_কালীপুজো_২০১৮.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination (কালী প্রতিমার অতিনিকট চিত্র) - সুকান্ত পার্ক শিশু উদ্যান নারায়ানতলা কালীপুজো ২০১৮ --Subhrajyoti07 11:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:03, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The more you go away from the center,it becomes blurry. --Syed07 16:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment : The subject is the center: it is indeed correct. For me the photo corresponds to the criteria. --Ercé 06:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ercé. DoF is absolutely fine and clearly shows the subject. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Neutral image quality is ok, needs more categories though. --MB-one 17:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Geigersthal_view_Heimenkirch_2018_(6).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View of the Geigersthal between Lindenberg and Heimenkirch in Germany.--Peulle 10:36, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Vignetting can be corrected same as others of today --Moroder 11:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Info Apparently, the consensus in the community disagrees. Unsure as to how to proceed; should they all be taken to CR or let them be reviewed individually on merit?--Peulle 16:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment you don’t need to take them to CR, simply fix vignetting which is very easy to do and which is quite evident. Besides that there is too much sky but that’s only my individual taste. --Moroder 22:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment No. As far as I'm concerned, that last judgment should stand; the community disagreed that vignetting was a problem. If we're going to have a community based project where standards are set based on community opinions, we should keep to those standards and not apply different levels of expectations for similar images. Logically, if the last one was considered a QI, this one should be as well.--Peulle 09:45, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support As before: There is some slight vignetting, but imho not really disturbing. --Smial 09:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Vignetting (can be easily corrected) and crop --Moroder 19:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support As before. The composition with so much empty sky is a bit dull, but I see no serious problem with vignetting. --Milseburg 08:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  • weak  Support. I do not like the horizon in the middle of the image and would have cut off some sky. But these are personal preferences. -- DerFussi 08:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Noordhoek,_Sudáfrica,_2018-07-23,_DD_127-133_PAN.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Noordhoek, South Africa --Poco a poco 20:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Very nice --Trougnouf 22:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, but the sea level have to be corrected. If you look through the gap on the left, the horizon is much higher there than on the right side (see notes). On the right side, the horizon also has a small step. --Milseburg 17:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC) - Well leveled now and there is no more reason for opposing in my eyes any more. --Milseburg 08:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Enough time has passed to fix it now, so it's  Oppose.--Peulle 18:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment ✓ New version, sorry, I took a short vacation with the family and had no access to my raw files until now --Poco a poco 19:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support New version is ok for me --Armenak Margarian 06:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support -- DerFussi 08:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 14:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)