Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 13 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2016-2019_Mazda_Axela_Sport_SKYACTIV-G_1.5_rear.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 2016 Mazda Axela Sport SKYACTIV-G 1.5 --TTTNIS 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 12:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 'm not impressed with the whitened license plate and the too dark area around the wheels. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per spurzem. --Smial 11:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark, probably fixable with better raw conversion. Would appreciate if the license plate wouldn't be retouched. I would not decline it due to the whitened license plate though (but then it should get a "Retouched" template). --Plozessor 12:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:2018-2023_Toyota_Alphard_GF_rear.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Rear view of 2018 Toyota Alphard GF --TTTNIS 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 12:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The white car in the background on the left is very distracting. Above all, there is hardly any contrast between it and the main object. The area around the wheels could be brighter. Also, I can't tell if a headlight is extending into the side or if it is a dark indentation. For me, the photo is not a quality image. But please let us hear what others say. -- Spurzem 14:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Smial 11:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Spurzem. --Plozessor 12:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:At_Ruislip_Lido_2024_022.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Coach for transporting baby carriers at Ruislip Lido --Mike Peel 07:21, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment DoF issue ? --Sebring12Hrs 09:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review, which DoF issue are you seeing? Both 403 and 303 in fg/bg of the subject are relatively sharp? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. DoF is sufficient. --Tagooty 08:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disgree, the subject is blurred in the background. --Sebring12Hrs 13:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Tagooty. --Plozessor 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I would probably have chosen a slightly longer focal length and a slightly different camera position, but considering the image resolution, I don't see any problems with the depth of field. Perfectly ok for an A4 or larger print. --Smial 14:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Bisi_Adeleye_Fayemi_01.svg

[edit]

File:Bisi Adeleye Fayemi 01.svg

  • Nomination Portrait of Bisi Adeleye Fayemi. --Indrajitdas 11:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unnecessary space on the sides and bottom that should be cropped out, no background behind the subject itself rendering it practically invisible on dark backgrounds, lots of stray artifacting. This appears to be the result of Illustrator's auto-trace tool applied to a photo. --ReneeWrites 22:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Renee, plus I think that the tracing didn't go very well and does not really resemble the person as she is looking on the original photo. --Plozessor 05:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. --Smial 11:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose File is missing --PantheraLeo1359531 20:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:At_the_Cradle_of_Aviation_Museum_2023_121.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: CM-002 at Cradle of Aviation Museum --Mike Peel 09:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy and seems tilted CW --MB-one 21:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
    Thanks for the review, rotated and noise reduced, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --MB-one 17:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose The sign in the left bottom corner is very disturbing. I know you didn't have the choice, but please discuss. --Sebring12Hrs 18:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Il_Pitosforo_(Otranto).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Il Pitosforo tree (Pittosporum) , Otranto, Italy --Bgag 03:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
    Harsh lighting, greens appear washed out. Fixable? --Tagooty 04:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose In the new version the greens have become browner, looks less natural to me. --Tagooty 02:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 08:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)