Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 06 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:White-striped_longtail_(Chioides_catillus).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination White-striped longtail (Chioides catillus), the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 17:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Noisy. --Daniel Case 16:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is much more useful to tell the nominator what´s maybe wrong so he could fix it. IMO the noise is fixable. --Hubertl 20:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment ✓ Done Noise reduced @Hubertl: Charlesjsharp 17:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --C messier 17:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support as messier. --Hubertl 21:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Polydamas_swallowtail_(Battus_polydamas_polydamas).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Polydamas, or gold-rim, swallowtail (Battus polydamas polydamas), the Pantanal, Brazil --Charlesjsharp 17:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not enough of butterfly in focus --Daniel Case 16:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. no one should evaluate photos if it's just random bad mood --Hubertl 20:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Spot on focus in an action moment! Jkadavoor 13:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment The way blur has been applied at the background makes the image look weird, IMHO. --C messier 14:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @C messier: no blur has been applied to the background. Charlesjsharp 17:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Propably, but it looks like it has (or noise reduction). --C messier 17:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Yes, has had noise reduction. Charlesjsharp 23:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Colegiata_de_Santa_María_del_Campo,_La_Coruña,_España,_2015-09-25,_DD_40.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Collegiate of Santa María del Campo, La Coruña, Spain --Poco a poco 16:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Nice resolution, sharpness, CA removed. Two areas for improvement required: (1) Perspective correction, at least partial. (2) Exposure, please lighten the shadows, so that the details of the door become more visible. It can take +0,5 stops overall. --Hendric Stattmann 14:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Poco a poco 20:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support why is this picture here at CR??? --Hubertl 21:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
    Good question Hubertl, I think that lately my pictures are quite popular in this section, cannot say why :) Poco a poco 21:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
    I think, you love it, beeing a kind of celebrity ;-) Shall I stop it? --Hubertl 22:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 21:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Beloselsky_Belozersky_Palace_Saint_Petersburg_on_Fontanki_river.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination View South from the Beloselsky-Belozersky Palace on the Fontanki river in Saint Petersburg. --Moroder 13:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose It lacks sharpness, sorry, not a QI to me. --Poco a poco 20:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I disagree. let's see some othe opinion --Moroder 12:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Diego. --Iifar 08:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree, plus a too tight crop on topo -- Alvesgaspar 12:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 21:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)