Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 02 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Head_of_Lion_on_Porta_Furba.jpg

[edit]

Surprise,surprise --Livioandronico2013 18:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok now is overexposure and underexposure I finish that is better --LivioAndronico talk 09:35, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Frydek-Mistek, Bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 06.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Basilica of the Visitation of Our Lady, Mariánské náměstí, Frýdek-Místek. Moravian-Silesian Region, Czech Republic. --Halavar 15:47, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
    Lacking contrast, top very unsharp. Mattbuck 10:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline ✓ Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
    Yes, but as with the other there's a strange horizontal graining. Mattbuck 20:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
overexposed areas from Picture


✓ Done Fixed. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Better, but there is still quite a bit of general noise/grain, and the top of the spire is not sharp.  Neutral Mattbuck 17:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 Neutral Not sure as well. --Hockei 15:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Overexposed. Yann 17:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 Comment It's not true. Pleaae show us a printscreen from your software, showing us that this image has overexposed parts. I have 2, and both didn't show it. --Halavar 19:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overexposed and/or blown-out lights. --Alchemist-hp 19:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version nuploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 22:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me now!--Hubertl 14:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 16:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurred crux at top --Christian Ferrer 07:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Christian Ferrer 07:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

File:JasperCountyCourthouse_retouched.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jasper County courthouse in Carthage, Missouri. --Kbh3rd 03:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  SupportGood quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad time of the day, wrong light direction, IMO. One side is in full shadow, the other in half shadow.--Jebulon 11:22, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support technical quality ok for QI. --MB-one 11:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support QI --Livioandronico2013 22:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Jebulon--Lmbuga 16:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support If the clock isn't wrong, we look at a north facade, which will all time of the day be in shadow if the sun shines. Some very small overexposed spots, but ineglible. High contrast well handled, good detail also in shadows. The lighting shows the structures of the facade clearly. Good sharpness. -- Smial 18:50, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support--Hubertl 09:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose full per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Alchemist-hp 05:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)