Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 29 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Geysir (8580947852).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Geysir in Iceland -- --Reykholt 20:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Author not a wikimedian. --P e z i 09:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Declining due to not being eligible for QI. Mattbuck 22:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Sheshulski krokusy.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Spring crocuses on the slopes Sheshul... --Swift11 10:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Less than 2 mega pixels. --Gyrostat 11:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
new version of this file, more than 2 mega pixels--Swift11 16:01
  •  Oppose - You should have 10 megapixels out of your camera; this image is just under 2.Crisco 1492 10:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - It is now over 2MP, but barely. Moreover, it looks unnatural - too-bright colours, and rather posterised. Mattbuck 19:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:London MMB «P9 River Thames.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination River Thames. Mattbuck 07:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unsharp at the sides --A.Savin 12:05, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Right side is perfectly sharp. There's a bit of blur on the left but it's very minor. Mattbuck 21:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Cayambe 09:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Campanula medium Blüte.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination white Campanula medium Mariofan13 20:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Problems with white balance. --A.Savin 12:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
What do you mean exactly? I took the photo without flash, the light came from right and from above - the flower is not eexact white ;). Mariofan13 12:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
This is the true white of this flower. --A.Savin 12:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
This is not the flower which I uses for my photo. And maybe the color of the light in our rooms is a reason for the yellowish flower too. Mariofan13 15:14, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Are there no other votes? Mariofan13 16:20, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - It is quite clearly the wrong colour. I don't know what colour the flower you used was, but the green of the plant is unnatural. Mattbuck 19:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 09:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Chalkwell railway station MMB 02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Chalkwell railway station. Mattbuck 08:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose You can't take quality images under these harsh lighting conditions, when half the subject is in the bright mid-day sun and the other half is in the deep shadow. --Sitacuisses 01:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I beg to differ. Mattbuck 21:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    Aaaah, that's beginner's knowledge in photography. There are too many pictures on this page that ignore basic rules of photography ("writing with light"). The Commons:Quality images guidelines say: "Lighting should be appropriate for portraying the subject." That's absolutely not the case here. Portrait photos get rejected here with much better lighting. I know these platform roofs make good lighting hard to achieve, but then you either need to exercise some extra care or you have to live without the QI label. --Sitacuisses 14:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose a shadow image: to many to dark areas, unfavorable lighting. --Alchemist-hp 22:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support I manage to see details at right, it's ok for me --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Fendt_Farmer_306_LS_Turbomatik_Wien_HBF.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Fendt Farmer 306 LS Turbomatk --Linie29 20:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose please remove first the dustspot, afterthat this image is QI --Taxiarchos228 04:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done--Linie29 10:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cayambe 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Blaenau Ffestiniog railway station MMB 03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Station sign at Blaenau Ffestiniog. Mattbuck 07:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose vertical alignment? --Charlesjsharp 09:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
    I could fix it, but I think it would be a worse photo for it, and also I wouldn't trust the sign to be upright to begin with. Mattbuck 22:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Cayambe 09:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 09:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Narcis (Narcissus) 12.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Narcis (Narcissus). A nice selection.
    Famberhorst 04:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Underexposed, sharpening halos. --Graphium 06:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
    Ok for me quality wise. But I'm not sure that if a species level identification is needed. So please discuss. --JDP90 15:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Category:Narcissus Division 1: Trumpet cultivars.
    Famberhorst 18:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --JDP90 07:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - the background seems unnaturally smooth to me. Mattbuck 22:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Something too strange and unnatural along the stem.--Jebulon 19:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 09:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Brilon,_St._Nikolai_Kirche,_Heiliger_mit_Buch.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Francis (Francis of Assisi), St. Nikolai Church, Brilon --Malchen53 13:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose too visible artefacts, not sufficient for few more than 2MP size --A.Savin 11:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry, this picture has over 9 MP --Malchen53 12:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
    0,858 x 2,562 = 2,198196. --A.Savin 18:27, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per A.Savin. --JDP90 07:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 09:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)