Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 28 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Dijon_-_Musée_des_Beaux-Arts_-_Héro_et_Léandre_(Paul_Gasq).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hero and Leander, or The Kiss --Romainbehar 05:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Appears slightly out of focus (also red pixel at heart of embrace). --Scotch Mist 09:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
    New version: improved sharpness, removed red pixel, downsized --Romainbehar 22:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 12:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --Scotch Mist 13:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Close_wing_pudding_position_of_Ochlodes_brahma_(Moore,_1878)_-_Grey-branded_Darter_IMG_0531.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing pudding position of Ochlodes brahma (Moore, 1878) - Grey-branded Darter. By User:Thamblyok --Atudu 08:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not a QI to me, sorry, it lacks detail --Poco a poco 12:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
    •  Support I disagree, the focus plan is well chosen but if you wan all the animal focused, you need to use focus stacking techniques. --Remontees 21:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Majority of the insect is OOF, and the sharp parts seem random. --Plozessor 09:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support For subjects that are difficult to photograph, we allow that images only need to have at least two Mpixels, which is already very little for a decent printout in A4 size. This one has over 14 Mpixels and is good enough at a normal viewing distance. I also notice positively that there are no oversharpening or denoising artifacts. Yes, a little more depth of field would have been better to be able to see a few more details around the eyes. --Smial 12:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Difficult to photograph. --Valereee 13:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Plozessor --Jakubhal 13:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I doubt that you can use focus stacking on living animals --Moroder 11:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)