Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 27 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Croome_Court_2016_177.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The Druid, Croome Park --Mike Peel 07:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Nice photo, but can you, please, remove magenta fringing on hand, head and staff? --LexKurochkin 14:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for looking, CA tweaked, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 Half done Better, but not yet QA. The fringing is still visible, looks disturbing on his right arm. --LexKurochkin 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I've had another go, how's that? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but the purple fringing is too strong yet --LexKurochkin 12:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Are you sure you're looking at the latest version (purged cache)? I've checked again, I can't see any purple now... Marking as discuss, hope that's OK. Thanks. Mike Peel 16:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 Support Today I have checked it again and see no fringing. Sorry, looks like it was my browser cash or something like that. --LexKurochkin 17:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me - not seeing purple fringing! --Scotch Mist 09:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. --Smial 12:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK for me also --Jakubhal 13:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Łódź_2023_42.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Łódź Palace Tower Garden View --Scotch Mist 06:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image seems a bit underexpoded, especially the western side of the tower. Pleas discuss about QI. -- Spurzem 16:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Spurzem, also not ideal composition and perspective. --Plozessor 13:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Plozessor: Am not sure that the image is significantly underexposed, but with regard to the composition and perspective does this appear "fixable" without removing interesting detail? --Scotch Mist 13:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Shadows and exposure leves are OK to me. It needs PC, though. Nacaru 19:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done @Nacaru: Perspective adjusted! --Scotch Mist 09:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
      •  Support. Nacaru 21:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support--Moroder 17:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)