Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 27 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Left valve of Anadara diluvii --Llez 04:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lifeboat house at the harbor Hindeloopen.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Lifeboat house at the harbor Hindeloopen.
-
- Nomination Entrance to the harbor Hindeloopen.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance to the harbor Hindeloopen.
-
- Nomination Tree root of a Baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) at the botanical garden in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trees in the backlight in the game reserve in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buds of a Japanese maple in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sconce at the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daffodil (Narcissus Cultivar “Suada”) iat the botanical garden in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of apartment buildings on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #43b in Auen, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings of Auen on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Michael, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seehotel Vinzenz on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #154 in Auen, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Apartment buildings on Auenstraße 2a in Auen, Schiefling, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yau Ma Tei Carpark Building --Wpcpey 00:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Nice photo, but too small - all photos nominated for Quality Image must be at least 2 megapixels. -- Ikan Kekek 01:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camera FKD 13x18. Cassette. --Knopik-som 00:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bottle Lake. --The Cosmonaut 00:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, Sharpness is low and there is too much noise. --XRay 04:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Simcoe. --The Cosmonaut 00:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose If you could get the rest of the photo to be pixellated in the same way as the left side, it might be good in a way as a photographic version of pointillism. -- Ikan Kekek 01:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Okanagan Lake - at the Kelowna City Park. --The Cosmonaut 00:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Not as bad as the next nomination, but this cellphone is giving you noisy, undetailed photos with artifacts. -- Ikan Kekek 01:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Columbia River in Revelstoke. --The Cosmonaut 00:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Very poor quality. That Android may not be capable of taking really good photos. -- Ikan Kekek 01:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rail tracks in Vinnytsia -- George Chernilevsky 20:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heliothis incarnata in Madrid (Spain). --Balles2601 18:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 20:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adult and juvenile double-crested cormorants in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 18:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mute swan with cygnets in the Prospect Park Lake --Rhododendrites 18:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common grackle in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 18:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 20:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-crowned night heron in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 18:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 20:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-crowned night heron in Prospect Park, Brooklyn --Rhododendrites 18:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 530e (F30) --Alexander-93 17:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination T-150K at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 17:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination MasterCraft X10 at Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 17:35, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domus Flavia in Palataine Hill in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domus Flavia in Palataine Hill in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacre-Coeur Paris,France --Pline 14:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of a church of Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain 006 --Lmbuga 14:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to the old city of Tübingen --Dktue 12:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eclectic house, Rue Emile Desmet 20, Lille, France --Velvet 12:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 13:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miniature olive tree (Olea europaea) in Lun, Croatia. --Palauenc05 11:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Picea abies. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Betula. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Betula. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 10:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination abandoned tractor Fiat 332C --Christian Ferrer 09:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alchemilla vulgaris. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 08:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alchemilla vulgaris. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 08:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Christ in the cathedral of Montevideo --Ermell 08:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Protestant branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 08:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baptismal font of the evangelic branch church in Trumsdorf --Ermell 08:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 09:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main altar in the collegiate church of St. Michael in Neunkirchen am Brand --Ermell 08:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden relief in the Catholic Church of St. Michael in Neunkirchen am Brand Wooden relief of the death of Mary around 1520 --Ermell 08:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Art Nouveau house, Rue de la Bassée 72, Lille, France --Velvet 06:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leucanthemum maximum in Jardin des 5 sens in Yvoire, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dranse de Montriond in commune of Montriond, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. But: Please check WB. IMO a touch of magenta. --XRay 06:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Episcopal Palace of Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palais de l'Isle in Annecy, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 06:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of a Meconopsis cambrica, Welsh poppy. Focus stack of 18 photos.
--Famberhorst 05:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower of a Meconopsis cambrica, Welsh poppy. Focus stack of 18 photos.
-
- Nomination Graves of the families Wissel, Bohrer and Hochherz at central cemetery in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chandelier of the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canada goose at the pond at the botanical garden in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blossoms of an apple tree in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graves of the families Witte and Dieckmann at central cemetery in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:12, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Schwarzenfels on Wörthersee-Süduferstrasse #18 in Maiernigg, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Polao of Bangladesh. --RockyMasum 01:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry. The picture is too much out of focus. --Imehling 15:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of the Frasciscan monastery of Rethymno. --C messier 20:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree peony flower. Garden cultivated hybrid (1) -- George Chernilevsky 20:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality----Lmbuga 13:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 16:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acacia. Leaf adaxial side. -- Knopik-som 05:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
It would be useful to know the species, since the photo aims on a certain part of the plant… --Nefronus 07:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Done Added description --Knopik-som 07:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Support --
Not CC-by-saLmbuga 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Support Very good--Lmbuga 14:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mature pupa of Mycalesis mineus (Linnaeus, 1758) – Dark-branded Bushbrown, before eclosing (by Sarpitabose) --Atudu 12:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality
Support Good quality. Would be good to include the EXIF data when you upload, so others can learn about camera settings, etc. --Tagooty 13:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 17:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Millennial drago (Dracaena drago) of Icod de los Vinos. Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. 43 --Lmbuga 08:08, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
This is almost identical to your other image of this tree. Same comments. --Tagooty 13:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC) Withdrawn --Lmbuga 23:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC) IT'S NOT IDENTICAL--Lmbuga 23:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Comment I'm sorry, but please explain the difference to File:Drago (Dracaena drago) Milenario de Icod de los Vinos. Tenerife. Illas Canarias eue-09.jpg. I think it's not a good idea to upload improvements with another name. --XRay 10:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian coot at its nest; Weingarten low moor --Llez 04:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 17:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vyborg Castle is a medieval Swedish and former Finnish castle of Karelia, now in Vyborg, Russia. --Reda Kerbouche 19:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 15:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rose hips on thorny shrub, late autumn, Lahaul, Himachal. Elev. 3,260m (10,660'). --Tagooty 15:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Is this a focus stack? It seems so + there are some artifacts from the stacking. --Nefronus 15:33, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes, it is a focus stack (identified in the Summary and CAT). Could you please identify the artifacts? --Tagooty 02:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Arount the two left sepals. --Nefronus 16:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)I withdraw my nomination
Thank you. As I'm new to ZereneStacker, when I learn how to retouch and correct such artifacts, I'll re-nominate. --Tagooty 09:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Star of Lyudmila Gurchenko on walk of Actor's Fame of Vyborg --Reda Kerbouche 05:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 18:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Freight train on a bridge, Ostrava, Czech Republic --Cmelak770 17:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Rocks_at_La_Corniche_-_March_2021_-_E.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rocks at La Corniche --Christian Ferrer 20:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 20:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed IMO --Lmbuga 01:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination you're likely right. Christian Ferrer 05:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Yes, there is some processing, but not overly disturbing in my opinion. Not a reason for withdrawing… Nefronus 07:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Question If this is overprocessed, what about all the other photos in this series? Wherein lies the alleged overprocessing? I think we'd benefit from having more of an actual discussion about this, as I'd like to know what I'm supposed to be disturbed by. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is not within the same serie, it was taken another day. "Overprocessing" may be somewhat subjective, I always work a long time on my photos and all my photos are edited in a different way, sometimes the result is natural, sometimes a bit less, sometimes I am successful, sometimes I likely do a bit too much. But in all case the photos I upload are the result of an artistic arbitrary choice from me, and here I guess I'm not "too" wrong as your first comment was "Beautiful". Wether "Beautiful" is enough to be a QI or not is, as far I know, not within our QI guideline. If someone like it, I'm happy, if it is QI, I'm happy, if it is not a QI I don't care. I withdraw because Lmbuga is IMO a quite good and careful reviewer since a long time and I tend to trust his judgement. I have nothing more to say. Regards, --Christian Ferrer 09:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- I frankly thought it was obviously of good quality and didn't feel I needed to type "good quality". -- Ikan Kekek 20:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is not within the same serie, it was taken another day. "Overprocessing" may be somewhat subjective, I always work a long time on my photos and all my photos are edited in a different way, sometimes the result is natural, sometimes a bit less, sometimes I am successful, sometimes I likely do a bit too much. But in all case the photos I upload are the result of an artistic arbitrary choice from me, and here I guess I'm not "too" wrong as your first comment was "Beautiful". Wether "Beautiful" is enough to be a QI or not is, as far I know, not within our QI guideline. If someone like it, I'm happy, if it is QI, I'm happy, if it is not a QI I don't care. I withdraw because Lmbuga is IMO a quite good and careful reviewer since a long time and I tend to trust his judgement. I have nothing more to say. Regards, --Christian Ferrer 09:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Sorry--Lmbuga 15:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment I think you were a little hasty in withdrawing the image. To me it seems a little oversaturated and if you pixelpeep you'll find some minor sharpening artifacts. I would have supported it. --Smial 11:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer 16:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Pictogram_voting_delete.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_delete.svg.png)
File:Trollius_altissimus_TK_2021-05-22_1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Trollius altissimus, Hrachoviště, Czechia --Nefronus 18:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Sorry, the flowers seems a bit overexposed --Christian Ferrer 20:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
They were indeed bright, but not clipped. I turned down the highlights so it should be better now. --Nefronus 20:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment IMO clipping in photography is not particularly an issue, however loss of detail may be an issue especially when the lost details are on the main subject. Sadly to edit an area where the details are lost don't make come back the details, at best the white becomes grey but nothing more. --Christian Ferrer 05:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, the flowers seems a bit overexposed ---Lmbuga 15:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Nefronus 17:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Nefronus 17:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Centaurea nervosa at Col de Tavaneuse (4).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Centaurea montana at col de Tavaneuse in Saint-Jean-d'Aulps, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
This is Centaurea nervosa, not Centaurea montana --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Oppose for now.
Renamed, Tournasol7 18:53, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I removed my opposing vote --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Support All good now. Nefronus 07:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
File:Acanthus_plant_in_the_garden_of_the_Casa_della_Nave_Europa_(Pompeii).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Acanthus plant in the garden of the Casa della Nave Europa (Pompeii) --Commonists 20:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, not straight, background confusingly intrusive. Rodhullandemu 22:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment The plant isn't straight.....and don't think the background is a problem. Please discuss. --Commonists 16:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Support I guess the background is sufficiently out of focus --Moroder 05:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Poor sharpness and random compo. --A.Savin 18:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Per A. Savin. --Nefronus 18:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Declined --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Symbol_declined.svg/20px-Symbol_declined.svg.png)
File:Русецкая_Маргарита.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Margarita Rusetskaya (by Svklimkin) --1Veertje 18:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 21:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose The image is too noisy for QI, and when nominating you have to attribute the uploader (unless it's your image). --A.Savin 12:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose noisy. ISO 2500? Why? Seven Pandas 00:03, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Very good portrait in nice available lighting situation. Rule of thumb: f is 200mm, shutter speed used: 1_250s. Perfect choice! why f_4 instead possible f_2.8? somewhat more DOF, that simple. Why ISO 2500? It was obviously too dark for a lower sensitivity setting when you just need f_4 and 1_250s. Under these conditions and for the fact that a Canon was used, the noise is even surprisingly unobtrusive. --Smial 08:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose soft, poor lighting, downsized. Charlesjsharp 14:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment Too soft? Really? You can count every single eyelash. Please don't confuse high contrast from hard lighting with image sharpness. Downscaled? How do you know? For one thing, in difficult lighting conditions, moderate downscaling is usually accepted here. For another, it may be cropping, because the image has definitely been cropped somewhat, at least in height. The photo also has more than 6 MPixels. In any case, that is good enough for a portrait that was not taken under studio conditions. Badly lit? It is actually quite excellently lit - the soft light may not be very exciting, but it is advantageous for the reproduction of the skin. --Smial 07:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Support QI IMO--Lmbuga 18:16, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment The format of the nomination needs to be fixed so as to credit the photographer, but I would support and don't understand the criticisms. I'd second Smial's points. -- Ikan Kekek 09:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Support Smial has defended this photo very well, and I agree that all camera settings seem very reasonable for a portrait photo. I would prefer some more microcontrast on the eyes, but many people believe that some mild softness is very appropriate for portrait photos (else people just begin to count wrinkles and pimples ;–). The background bokeh is very good. --Aristeas 10:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Support per above. -- Ikan Kekek 19:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Support --Commonists 12:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Support per smial Rhododendrites 13:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/20px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)