Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 26 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Shell ofa cone snail, Conus praecellens forma aliguay --Llez 04:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Museum Hindeloopen in Hindeloopen.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Museum Hindeloopen in Hindeloopen.
-
- Nomination Bidwell Mansion, located at 525 Esplanade in Chico, California, was the home of General John Bidwell and Annie Bidwell. Now a museum and State Historic Park, it is California Historical Landmark #329 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. --Frank Schulenburg 03:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination July column in Paris, France. --Chabe01 02:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Siegel on Wörthersee-Süduferstraße #23 in Sekirn, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 04:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Siegel on Wörthersee-Süduferstrasse #23 in Sekirn, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pilgrimage church Saints Primus and Felician and Our Lady of the Rosary church, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Schwarzenfels on Wörthersee-Süduferstrasse #18 in Maiernigg, Maria Wörth, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue Nile Gorge, near Debre Libanos, Oromia, Ethiopia --Tagooty 02:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 03:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Main building of the Villa Pellizzari di Meduna in Brescia. --Moroder 23:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 03:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Fontana del Pescatorello fountain on Piazza Duomo in Prato. --Moroder 23:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Elafonisi beach, Crete. --C messier 20:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 03:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Tree peony flower. Garden cultivated hybrid (2) -- George Chernilevsky 20:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree peony flower. Garden cultivated hybrid (3) -- George Chernilevsky 20:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roquebrun and the Orb river --Christian Ferrer 19:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martin Wonnacott and his JZX100 Chaser in pursuit of a Soarer, June 2017. -- Collard 18:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 19:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of a church of Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain 006 --Lmbuga 19:00, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment That's quite an amazing fresco. If you know or can find out who painted it, please add the information to your file descriptions. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Domes of Santa Maria of Loreto church and Holy Name of Mary church in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue at the House of the Vestals in Forum Romanum in Rome, Lazio, Italy. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:38, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. 005 --Lmbuga 16:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Queen's Park Entrance of the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada --Maksimsokolov 15:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality--Lmbuga 15:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ship propeller of the ship Titlis (1910), Puerto de la Cruz. Tenerife. 14 --Lmbuga 11:08, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Debre Libanos Monastery, Oromia, Ethiopia. --Tagooty 10:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:13, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Port of Novalja, Croatia. --Palauenc05 10:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Altar of the Protestant branch church in Alladorf --Ermell 07:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Mary with the Child in the Cathedral of Montevideo --Ermell 07:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Building at 399 rue des Traîneaux in Avoriaz, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lac de Vallon in commune of Bellevaux, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pointe de Nantaux seen from Nyon Guérin in Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 11:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Mélan carthusian monastery in Taninges, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pointe de Nyon and Pointe d'Angolon in commune of Morzine, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Dove snail, Graphicomassa ligula --Llez 05:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Mahlberg Tower from west to north to east, Malsch, District of Karlsruhe, Germany --Llez 05:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Altar of the Holy Cross chapel (Kreuzkapelle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign “Kirschners Stiege” in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination A leaf of Dactylorhiza majalis, Hrachoviště, Czechia --Nefronus 18:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A footbridge complex at lake Untreu in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:50, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Vyborg Castle is a medieval Swedish and former Finnish castle of Karelia, now in Vyborg, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 19:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Plaque in memory of the Republic of Brescia. --Moroder 08:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Marble balustrade to the main altar in the Madonna del Lino church. --Moroder 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dome painted by Antonio Mariani in the Madonna del Lino church. --Moroder 08:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Farmer propels cable basket with passenger, Bhaga river, Lahaul. Elev. 3,250m (10,663') --Tagooty 02:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 03:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Uthandi beach, view south, Chennai --Tagooty 02:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 03:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A JR East E353 stopping at Katsunuma-budōkyō Station, Kōshū, Japan (by くろふね) --廣九直通車 03:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 03:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz 300 GD Cabriolet at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 20:42, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 20:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stork couple in the Weiherwiesen
--F. Riedelio 17:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Despite the small size, the flying stork isn't sharp enough and the stork in the nest is quite out of focus. --C messier 21:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Stork couple in the Weiherwiesen
-
-
-
- Nomination: Fishers and small island in Lake Burullus - Egypt. By User:Myousry6666 --Benoît Prieur 09:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Review
White CA along the edge of the boat, pole, tree trunks. Otherwise a lovely scene. --Tagooty 11:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Comment Filename should be edited to be more specific in describing the scene. -- Ikan Kekek 06:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Hi, renaming 
Done. --Benoît Prieur 06:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I feel like this photo may be of good enough quality, but I don't want to second-guess Benoit. -- Ikan Kekek 07:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old House, Progonnaya Street 7A, Vyborg, Leningrad oblast, Russia --Reda Kerbouche 09:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose IMHO, too soft. --C messier 21:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination View from La Bourgeoise in commune of Samoëns, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 06:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
_02.jpg)
_-_2021-05-23_-_1.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Puerto_de_la_Cruz._Tenerife._Espa%C3%B1a_eue14.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
Consensual review
[edit]File:2020_year._Herbarium._Picea_abies._img-001.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Picea abies. --Knopik-som 11:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 11:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)- Support --Lmbuga 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality in its depiction of the subject. The license seems fine. What's the problem? -- Ikan Kekek 20:32, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, the license seems good, but in description is mentionned: "This image is not public domain." Tournasol7 20:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This seems like a misunderstanding. We allow photos which are not in the public domain. "Not in the public domain" does not mean it does not have a free license. CC BY-SA is not public domain, for example. The template is confusing because it is presented far from the actual license, and is combined with a request not to upload new versions (which is not related to the license), but there is no licensing problem here. — Rhododendrites talk | 03:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Tournasol7 06:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Tournasol7 06:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
File:2020_year._Herbarium._Acer_platanoides._img-001.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Acer platanoides. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 07:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)S
- Promotion
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)- Support--Lmbuga 16:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Great quality, good license. -- Ikan Kekek 08:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Tournasol7 06:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Tournasol7 13:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
File:2020_year._Herbarium._Acer_platanoides._img-002.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Acer platanoides. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 07:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)- Support --Lmbuga 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
The licence is CC BY-SA 4.0. Why does the image have to be public domain? --Nefronus 19:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC) - This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Again really well done. -- Ikan Kekek 09:00, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Tournasol7 06:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Tournasol7 13:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
File:2020_year._Herbarium._Acacia._img-002.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Acacia. Leaf abaxial side. -- Knopik-som 05:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
This image is not public domain. --Tournasol7 16:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC) - Support -- CC-by sa Lmbuga 16:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
This file has a license - CC-BY-SA-4.0. This is a free license and not a public domain. Public domain CC-0. --Knopik-som 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC) Support The image (and other recently proposed images by the author) should not be declined. The licence info was perhaps wrongly interpreted by Tournasol7. --Nefronus 20:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga 20:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC) - Support Impressive. -- Ikan Kekek 09:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, Images are very good, but in the description is mentionned: "This image is not public domain. Please respect the copyright protection." Tournasol7 11:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is my file. Why should he be public domain? Wikipedia has information on what the Public Domain is - public domain. Knopik-som (talk) 11:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- But you added this "This image is not public domain" in the description. Tournasol7 13:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- File has a freely license - CC-BY-SA-4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike ). License CC-BY-SA-4.0 - not public domain. License public domain - Cc-zero (Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication). --Knopik-som 14:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- So please, check the description in all your images here. Tournasol7 20:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This file is not public domain. Domena publiczna (ang. public domain) – w najwęższym znaczeniu twórczość, z której można korzystać bez ograniczeń wynikających z uprawnień, które mają posiadacze autorskich praw majątkowych, gdyż prawa te wygasły lub twórczość ta nigdy nie była lub nie jest przedmiotem prawa autorskiego.
- File examples: Public domain, Not public domain -- Knopik-som 21:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, this is my mistake. I understood it wrong. I'm sorry for all this chaos. Therefore, I vote Support, because the photos are of very good quality. Tournasol7 05:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, this is my mistake. I understood it wrong. I'm sorry for all this chaos. Therefore, I vote
- So please, check the description in all your images here. Tournasol7 20:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- File has a freely license - CC-BY-SA-4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike ). License CC-BY-SA-4.0 - not public domain. License public domain - Cc-zero (Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication). --Knopik-som 14:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- But you added this "This image is not public domain" in the description. Tournasol7 13:58, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is my file. Why should he be public domain? Wikipedia has information on what the Public Domain is - public domain. Knopik-som (talk) 11:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Tournasol7 12:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
File:20210508_Dolycoris_baccarum.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A sloe bug (Dolycoris baccarum) on a leave in the protected landscape area in Blieskastel. --DavidJRasp 19:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, but in my opinion the bug is 'lost' in the large portion of the photo taken up by the leaf and does not have enough detail itself to be described by the image. --Nefronus 18:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support The composition is a matter of taste, but the insect is well captured. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, the object in the photo is too small--Lmbuga 16:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan --Moroder 05:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 12:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer 20:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
File:20210508_Bombus_pascuorum_03.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A common carder bee drinks nectar from deadnettle --DavidJRasp 19:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, but in my opinion the flowers/top leaves nor the insect have enough focus. --Nefronus 18:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Pale colors. Dry shrub-like. Not easy to distinguish between the bee and flower. --Gpkp (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC) - Oppose the bee is obscured, but seems to be the focal point? Rhododendrites 13:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:004_2010_07_06_Gliederfüßer.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Young green bush-cricket on a blossom of a pot marigold --F. Riedelio 15:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Support Good quality. Nice composition--Lmbuga 21:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose overprocessed, oversaturated --Charlesjsharp 14:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC) New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 16:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality to me, though if Charles knows there's something wrong with the colors, I'd defer to him and cross out this vote. -- Ikan Kekek 09:12, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Color-rich; good contrast. --Gpkp 15:56, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 12:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:004_2013_07_15_Gliederfüßer.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Green bush-cricket on a blossom of a pot marigold --F. Riedelio 15:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Oppose overprocessed, oversaturated --Charlesjsharp 14:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC) New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 16:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Rework looks fine. --Smial 14:51, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Fine--Lmbuga 21:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 12:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Tuning_World_Bodensee_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(OW1A0099).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination BMW M5 at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 20:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Photograph of identifiable people. --F. Riedelio 08:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Added personality rights warning --MB-one 10:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
In my opinion there’s too much space on the left, although the rest of the photo is good. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 06:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC) - Support OK, though with maybe an odd perspective on the left, but why is this in Consensual Review without any vote? -- Ikan Kekek 06:22, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor composition: Too much space on the left. Scarce, on the right. It should be the other way around.--Lmbuga 17:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm inclined to agree.--Peulle 10:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Skoda_Enyaq_iV_80_–_f1_03052021.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Skoda Enyaq iV 80 --M 93 20:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Imehling 07:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I find this judgement unfair, in the past when I nominate my pictures for QI, they get decline because of "manipulated plate". M 93 does exactly that and he get a pass? One of my nominated image image got declined because of this reason and another nearly did only because I uncensored the plate. Apparently to some, "white spaces are ugly". I usually blank my plates but avoid doing so when I nominate them due to the distracting white space. Decline. --Vauxford 21:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC) Support If the blanking of the number plate had been messy, I wouldn't have commented, but... where I'm from a number plate is protected personal data and some sites won't accept images with visible registrations numbers. Rodhullandemu 16:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Rodhullandemu Well if that the case, it should've been promoted. To me this is just double-standards, I might as well re-nominate it then. What nonsense! --Vauxford (talk) 22:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment My only standard is whether the method used is distracting, but I think we need to come to agreement about this. Perhaps a talk page thread about this would drum up enough interest to produce something approaching consistency. -- Ikan Kekek 20:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I think it's less a double-standard and more just inconsistency on a matter we have no clear rules about. There is no official policy on QIC and license plates, so nobody should be opposing just on that basis unless it's messy. If we're going to come up with general rules, it should probably be project-wide rather than specific to QIC. I would be curious to know how GDPR applies to photos of license plates, for example. Certainly there are copyright issues with some (like the plates in the US which have graphic elements), but unless explicitly required by law my sense is there's not much reason to blur unless there are extraordinary privacy reasons in play (photographing someone doing something illegal, perhaps a car parked outside someone's private home, etc.). But that's probably for a different venue. Pending those clear requirements, I think we should just leave it to the discretion of the photographer. Rhododendrites 16:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → 
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Promoted --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:52, 23 May 2021 (UTC)