Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 19 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

==

[edit]
  • Nomination Apex AP-0. By User:Theoalexa2020 --IamMM 08:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Peulle 07:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Wait Dubious copyright status. Details in DR. --Gyrostat 22:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As we can not say this image comes from a commoner we should not promote it as QI. --Augustgeyler 21:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose August is right. -- Ikan Kekek 00:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with both of you --Halavar 12:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unclear ownership --F. Riedelio 09:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 18:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

File:20191219_Słoń_na_ulicy_Ameru_Jaipur_1137_9650_DxO.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Elephant in Amer by Jakubhal --UnpetitproleX 08:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Level of detail is too low here. --Augustgeyler 18:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 20:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support For me O.K. too -- Spurzem 11:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low detail, tight right crop and a portion of the elephant is hidden behind the textile --Poco a poco 18:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Low details and shallow DOF. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support OK, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 21:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco a poco. Sorry, but not a QI for me --Halavar 12:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others --F. Riedelio 09:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 18:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)