Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 19 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Alfa_Romeo_GTV6,_Cape_Town_(P1060009).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination One of the first 100 GTV6 sold in South Africa and carries a numbered plaque on the side, Cape Town --MB-one 08:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support OK. --Peulle 10:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree Burnt highlights, random composition, very bad lighting. Please try VI for such snapshots. --Smial 09:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 08:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Smial. But also it can not be a valued image in my opinion. -- Spurzem 12:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 Comment Naja, ist doch ein recht seltenes Auto, oder? --Smial 17:31, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Chateau_de_Laeken.001_-_Brussel.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Château de Laeken (Royal Palace of Laeken), in 2016 in Brussels (Belgium). --Drow male 04:53, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMHO not up to standards. JPG artifacts in the grass and the sky, not really sharp --Podzemnik 08:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. It's a mobile phone shot.--Peulle 06:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. Denoising kills detail. --Smial 09:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik. -- Ikan Kekek 08:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 09:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not very bad, but some JPG artifacts in the grass.--ArildV 10:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_Döppersberg_2018_280.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Reichsbahndirektion, Elberfeld --Atamari 08:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Please provide a better file description to all your nominations --Moroder 08:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Not done within a week. --XRay 18:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Question what is the better description as "Reichsbahndirektion Elberfeld, Döppersberg, Wuppertal"?  Question Is this a description competion? Atamari 20:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Not a competition, but this is a cite from the guide lines: Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.. My contra vote is a result of Moroder's issue. I didn't checked the image. Just one week without any response. Now I set the image to CR. For me description and image are OK. May be the image could be a little bit sharper and less noise, but good enough. --XRay 17:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 10:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per XRay. --Aristeas 08:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Stone_circle.105_-_Stonehenge.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Stone circle of Stonehenge in 2018, in the county of Wiltshire, England, United Kingdom. --Drow male 04:58, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Blurry --Podzemnik 09:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Podzemnik. Camera shake? --Smial 08:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others + wb.--ArildV 10:20, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Sumba,_tanah_keindahan.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2019. By User:Jordan siva --Aldnonymous 03:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Lens flare on the right and a burned sky. --Ermell 06:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - The sky looks OK to me, but I don't like the lens flare. -- Ikan Kekek 21:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 16:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ermell and Ikan, sorry. --Aristeas 08:07, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Alexander_Jagiellonczyk.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination By User:Avalokitesvara --Piotr Bart 07:35, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Invented and anachronistic depiction. --Kathisma 12:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC).
  •  Support it might be fictitious but it's well made. --MB-one 09:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one. --Aristeas 08:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 16:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)