Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 18 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Cars_du_Rhône_Fast_Starter_LE_-_Aéroport_Lyon_Saint-Exupéry.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Buses in Lyon Saint-Exupéry airport --Billy69150 20:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sky is blown-out at the top. --King of Hearts 05:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. The sky can not be blue at any time. -- Spurzem 11:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I'm not complaining about the cloudy day, but the fact that a big chunk of the sky is literally #ffffff. --King of Hearts 01:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Kvardek du 18:04, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 04:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Mallard_(Anas_platyrhynchos)_chick.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) chick, one to two days old, WWT London Wetland Centre, Barnes --Charlesjsharp 10:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question Do you shoot RAW or jpeg? Noise and artifacts are quite strong for ISO 800 on a 70D. --Kadellar 16:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support There is some color noise. But it's still a QI --MB-one 13:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The noise is not my problem. But the DOF is much too low for me. --Hockei 16:57, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice and QI for me though the DOF should be better. -- Spurzem 15:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 04:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Squirrel,_Volkspark_Jungfernheide,_Berlin_(20150503-DSC_0036).JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Red squirrel in Volkspark Jungfernheide --MB-one 08:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose subject to small --Denkmalhelfer 10:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 20:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Ausgleichsstimme  Support für Getrolle --Ralf Roletschek 10:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  •  Comment @Ralf Roletschek: Wer trollt hier? Anstelle von solchen inhaltslosen Anmerkungen solltest du dich mit dem Bild befassen. Das Bild kann man verbessern, indem man es einfach passend beschneidet --Denkmalhelfer 05:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Another crop could be useful. Parts with lights overexposed.--XRay 12:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose If cropped more, the image won't meet QI resolution requirements. -Artemy Voikhansky 20:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

File:2014.10.03.-02-Edertal Kleinern--Gemeiner Riesenschirmling.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Gemeiner Riesenschirmling (Parasol) - Macrolepiota procera --Hockei 13:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Other one's better; unsharpness at top is a little distracting --Daniel Case 20:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 Comment You're right that the other one looks a bit sharper due to the shorter distance. But that doesn't mean that this picture is unsharp IMO and it has a better crop for the same reason. I'd like more opinions. --Hockei 06:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI IMO, every 3-D-Object has different perspectives. --Hubertl 08:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I'll see no issue with this picture and fine for me. --Derzno 09:20, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not sharp at all and los contrast partly --Denkmalhelfer 09:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Sockpuppet Poco a poco 19:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

* Ausgleichsstimme  Support für Getrolle --Ralf Roletschek 11:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  •  Support QI --Palauenc05 07:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 04:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)