Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 16 2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Ketelmeerdijk, art of Corten steel on the dike near the Ketelhaven.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Ketelmeerdijk, art of Corten steel on the dike near the Ketelhaven.
-
- Nomination Southern sacristy wall of the parish church the Assumption with the fresco of Saint Christopher, ‹Keutschach altar› and epitaphs on Domplatz, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archway building on Domplatz #4 and chapter house (western part) on Domplatz #5, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former priory building on Domplatz #7, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Himalayan peaks Jaonli To Trishul Panorama from Kartik SwamiI. By User:Goutam1962 --Bodhisattwa 21:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Comment A lot of dust spots that need to be removed. --UnpetitproleX 22:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry! Too many dust spots in the sky. I think not to repair. --Steindy 22:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tram 765, Heaton Park, Manchester --Mike Peel 19:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose nose of tram is very noisy & driver out of focus, sorry --Virtual-Pano 22:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beach huts at Scarborough --Mike Peel 19:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White stork (Ciconia ciconia) --Charlesjsharp 19:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:47, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White stork (Ciconia ciconia) --Charlesjsharp 19:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protestants of the easter march in Wittelsbach park, Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Good quality, but what is with the personally rights of the children? --Steindy 19:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the hint, I will reupload safe files for this --PantheraLeo1359531 20:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ford Mustang VI Mach 1 in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 17:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality; the parking almost perfect :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai i30 Fastback N in Böblingen.--Alexander-93 17:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trabant 601 TRAMP at Pfingsttreffen Pütnitz 2018 --MB-one 17:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone sculpture of a creature at former "Jesuitenkolleg" in Trier. --Palauenc05 15:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ford Focus Turnier (Facelift) in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 14:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz Citan in Leonberg.--Alexander-93 14:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Petersen Rock Garden, Central Oregon, U.S. --Another Believer 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 19:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula, Puebla, Mexico --Another Believer 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 19:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Angel Abbey, Saint Benedict, Oregon, U.S. --Another Believer 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective correction needed, too much CAs especially near the image borders and too unsharp there, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 17:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mt. Angel Pioneer Cemetery, Oregon, U.S. --Another Believer 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House in Oregon CIty, Oregon, U.S. --Another Believer 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Florian Sittsam, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
There is no EXIF so impossible to know if there has been downsizing on these images. Can you clarify please @Steindy:--Charlesjsharp 19:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Florian Sittsam, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manfred Fischer, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mustafa Yavuz, player of SC Wiener Neustadt. --Steindy 12:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East face of the Reiter Alpe in the Berchtesgaden Alps --Milseburg 12:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Nieuwe Kerk (1665) in Groningen, the Netherlands
--Wutsje 11:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination The Nieuwe Kerk (1665) in Groningen, the Netherlands
-
- Nomination View of the Großer Linowsee near Rheinsberg
--F. Riedelio 09:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination View of the Großer Linowsee near Rheinsberg
-
- Nomination Beech forest near the Großer Linowsee near Rheinsberg
--F. Riedelio 09:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Beech forest near the Großer Linowsee near Rheinsberg
-
- Nomination Building on the Mountain of a Thousand Buddhas in Jinan --Ermell 08:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rapids of the Trubach between Wannbach and Unterzaunsbach in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 08:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fire pots in front of a restaurant in Shanghai --Ermell 08:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pavillion at the Boatu Spring in Jinan, China --Ermell 08:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alley in a residential area in Beijing --Ermell 08:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Amazing series! Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial to the deportation of Sinti and Roma in Trier, Trier Cathedral in the background. --Palauenc05 07:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing Mud puddle activity of Papilio protenor Cramer, 1775 - Spangle (Male) (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 05:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:33, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross section of a closed flower of the dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Focus stack of 24 photos.
--Famberhorst 05:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 06:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Cross section of a closed flower of the dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Focus stack of 24 photos.
-
- Nomination Close wing Nectaring of Polytremis eltola (Hewitson, 1869) - Yellow-spot Swift (by Sandipoutsider) --Atudu 04:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Stepro 05:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Machine room of the PD 'Stadt Wehlen', oiler. By --Stepro 04:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 49th International Dixieland Festival Dresden: Pageant, festival mascot. By --Stepro 04:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Johannis chapel in Adendorf , monument 28796386 seen from South --Virtual-Pano 21:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Johannis chapel in Adendorf , monument 28796386 seen from South-East --Virtual-Pano 21:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pari Mahal stone arches by Divya.co --UnpetitproleX 20:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dacia Sandero III in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 19:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kia Sportage in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 19:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thyas honesta --Charlesjsharp 17:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Very good quality, but one of the antennae is partially cropped out. Do you vote to decline in such cases, Charles? -- Ikan Kekek 20:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Support I'll support, though. -- Ikan Kekek 18:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Yes, a decline would be fair Ikan Kekek. New version uploaded with complete antennae. Careless crop.
-
- Nomination Borago officinalis - Borage Flower--PROPOLI87 05:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurred with artifacts. Sorry. --Ermell 07:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC) CommentI actually changed slightly by increasing the texture and details, but the color wasn't saturated. I can desaturate.PROPOLI87 07:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 07:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC) CommentI would like you to judge after looking at File: Borraggine - Borago officinalis.jpg and consider that the flowers in this last photo are portrayed from below, and that the QI candidate photo is a "macro" close-upPROPOLI87 13:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 13:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) in the nature reserve Marlachwiesen
--F. Riedelio 10:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC) - Promotion
QI if you remove the purple CA --Poco a poco 18:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 12:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Two domestic geese (Anser anser domesticus) in the nature reserve Marlachwiesen
-
- Nomination BC Ferries ROPAX ferry, MV Spirit of Vancouver Island, leaving Tsawwassen Ferry Terminal, Canada --GRDN711 21:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 18:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Corrected - thanks for the review. --GRDN711 22:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bagacay Point Lighthouse, Cebu -- MartinMichlmayr 04:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bagacay Point Lighthouse, Cebu -- MartinMichlmayr 04:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Flower painting on pillar, Sirao Pictorial Garden -- MartinMichlmayr 04:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kriebstein Castle, Germany. By User:GZagatta --IamMM 01:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review
Please, remove the dust spot --Rjcastillo 04:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, eastward view. --Mathieu Kappler 22:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, eastward view. --Mathieu Kappler 22:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, eastward view. --Mathieu Kappler 22:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rue des Mines in Wittenheim, Haut-Rhin, France, eastward view. --Mathieu Kappler 22:42, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Divine Mary Maternity Church. San Cristobal Hill --Rjcastillo 22:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Daisy --PROPOLI87 17:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sponge (Scalarispongia scalaris), Pistol Bay, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 16:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Long-spined urchin (Diadema setosum), Cynthiana, Paphos, Cyprus --Poco a poco 16:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Manuel Wallner, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 13:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Torre Provincial, Rambla Méndez Núñez, Alicante. --Kallerna 12:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination BMW 327 from 1938 at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 10:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz EQC at Retro Classics Stuttgart 2022.--Alexander-93 10:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Chinese Bridge, Croome Court --Mike Peel 09:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Croome Court, Croome D'Abitot --Mike Peel 09:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Turtuk panorama by Zhongsense --UnpetitproleX 17:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose This is actually a very good quality panorama for a mobile phone, and a nice view. But I think the "overprocessing" effect as with most phone cameras, and in particular the posterisation visible strongly on some clouds, makes this not QI for me, sorry. Also I wish there was just a bit more vertical view especially in the centre. Feel free to ask for more opinions in CR. --Domob 16:15, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bibliotheque Sainte-Barbe 2010-06-16 (by Jastrow) --Sebring12Hrs 17:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A side building of Gare de Remiremont, Vosges, France. --Mathieu Kappler 03:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs perspective correction. --Mike Peel 06:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: Done See now. --Mathieu Kappler 19:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Lymantria_todara_female.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lymantria todara female --Charlesjsharp 13:11, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough. --Steindy 17:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC).
- It is sharp, though depth of field is limited. Charlesjsharp 20:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Seems perfectly in line with images that have been promoted regularly here. You'd need focus stacking to get it any better and I don't think we should insist on that for QIs.--Peulle 06:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. The sharpness of the image itself is probably quite sufficient, and the depth of field is also adequate when it comes only to the drawing on the wings. But exactly there is a problem: The direct illumination hardly allows to recognize structures and it is not distinguishable whether the bright spots everywhere in the picture are reflections or whether they belong to the natural patterning. For me, unfortunately, no QI because of the unsuitable lighting. --Smial 12:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
File:Vains_Grouin_du_sud_vue_mt_st_michel.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View of Mont Saint-Michel from the Pointe du Grouin du Sud, in Vains, France --Velvet 10:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose WB off, subject is too far away. --Kallerna 13:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Impressive distant shot. Let's hear other voices. --Milseburg 16:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness isn't great, but it's a gray day. Very painterly. -- Ikan Kekek 00:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Milseburg --Kritzolina 06:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Footman_moth_(Barsine_cuneonotata).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Footman moth (Barsine cuneonotata) --Charlesjsharp 09:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough in wide areas. --Steindy 17:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Second opinion please. This is a sharp image of a small insect. Charlesjsharp 20:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Question How small? The Wikipedia stub does not address that. -- Ikan Kekek 00:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- about 20mm. Charlesjsharp 17:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Sharp enough, considering the size. -- Ikan Kekek 00:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Seems perfectly in line with images that have been promoted regularly here. You'd need focus stacking to get it any better and I don't think we should insist on that for QIs.--Peulle 06:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Heortia_vitessoides.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Heortia vitessoides --Charlesjsharp 09:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry! Not sharp enough in wide areas. --Steindy 17:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Second opinion please. This is a sharp image of a small insect. Charlesjsharp 20:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC) - Support -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose underexposed, small resolution, lof DOF. --Kallerna 07:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Castle_of_Combret_Nauviale_12.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Castle of Combret in commune of Nauviale, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 03:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Useful if the Description indicates which part of the castle is depicted, the angle of view, etc. --Tagooty 03:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
the position of the photographer determines it --Tournasol7 03:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The filename and Description imply the full church. The image is a specific part of the church. Potential users search based on text keywords. --Tagooty 02:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Each photo contains information about the photographer's position. The user can easily find out from which side the photo was taken. --Tournasol7 05:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC) - Support Very good. --Sebring12Hrs 05:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support You can always ask for more, but description and cats are accurante enough for QI --Poco a poco 18:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz 06:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
File:SC_Wiener_Neustadt_vs._SK_Austria_Klagenfurt_2015-10-20_(102).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Manuel Wallner, player of SK Austria Klagenfurt. --Steindy 13:29, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeInsufficient quality: bottom crop. --Peulle 14:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Would it be better when I cut the photo to 2000x2000 pixels? Let's discuss. --Steindy 23:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe. It's not the size of the photo that bothers me but the fact that the intention here was clearly to capture the whole player and this was not successful, cutting off part of the foot and ball.--Peulle 07:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose per above. I sometimes find it OK for a photo to leave out a hand here or there, but in this case, cutting off the foot is distracting and ill-serves the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)- Info New version uploaded. --Steindy 19:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support I'm OK with this. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Yes, this one works.--Peulle 06:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Absurd. Less information is better than full (apart from the rather radical downscaling) information? Don't get it. --Smial 13:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Why don't you get it? There are many photos of all types where a crop is essential to create a good composition. Having missed the foot, this crop is fine. Still waiting for @Steindy: to respond on downscaling. Charlesjsharp 08:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The crop made this a better composition. Downscaling is another issue; I'll look forward to Steindy's response to Charles' question below. -- Ikan Kekek 00:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I too have always suspected that Steindy's images are downsized but I am sure he can put us right as he wouldn't be nominating downsampled/downsized images in contravention of QI guidelines. Charlesjsharp 21:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC).
- Comment It is remarkable that Charlesjsharp never misses an opportunity to try and pee on my leg. Aside from not downsampling, I don't need to either as the quality of the Canon 300/2.8 is so good that with a bit of skill you can get razor sharp photos with it. On the other hand, it's funny that he comes up with these arguments and nominates "stamps" in the format 2,000 × 1,420 px (File:Mating pair of Loxura atymnus Stoll, 1780 - Yamfly WLB.jpg) himself, as done today, at a Camera resolution of 5184x3456 px. I don't even want to philosophize about other Photoshop embellishments. --Steindy 21:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
- File:Mating pair of Loxura atymnus Stoll, 1780 - Yamfly WLB.jpg in not my nomination. Charlesjsharp 08:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
File:Common_tern_2022_04_24_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A common tern (Sterna hirundo) in flight --Alexis Lours 12:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 22:31, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Support OK for QI I think. Charlesjsharp 15:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough and parts of the wings blown out. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC) - Support Good quality.PROPOLI87 15:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 15:16, 11 May 2022 (UTC)