Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 12 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Indian_Elephant_Egrets_Forest_Reflection_Nagarhole_Kabini_Apr22_D72_24269.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Indian elephant (Elephas maximus indicus), male with single tusk, with Little egrets and forest, Nagarhole, Kabini Reservoir, India --Tagooty 04:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great image, but way too noisy to my mind. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. The image noise is really unexpectedly high. Has an underexposed photo been strongly brightened here? Actually, the camera used is not known for producing such strong noise already at ISO100. A pity, because the scene ist nice. --Smial 11:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Indian_Elephant_Egret_Reflection_Nagarhole_Kabini_Apr22_D72_24269.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Indian elephant (Elephas maximus indicus), male with single tusk, with Little egret, reflection, Nagarhole, Kabini Reservoir, India --Tagooty 04:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great image, but way too noisy to my mind. -- Ikan Kekek 06:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is indeed quite a lof of noise but that's not the main problem. This is an extraction of this image (also being discussed in CR just above). Regardless of this discussion, they cannot both be QIs.--Peulle 08:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)