Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 10 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mont Fort panoramic view01 360 degrees 2015-04-26.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Mont Fort panoramic --KlausFoehl 09:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Impressive! For me FP --Hubertl 10:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose After removing the stitching error, I will agree. --Cccefalon 00:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
     Comment I really looked carefully 1:1, I wanted to find the error, but I did´nt find this one. I knew, there must be one. Respekt, Its even not a small one and pretty obviously.. --Hubertl (talk) 08:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Examine the cables please. There is a cable from the roof top down to the snow. It ends in the nowhere and appears shifted from the position again. In full resolution perhaps 2 cm from bottom. --Cccefalon 10:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI very good quality, maybe would it be better by straightening of 0.20 °.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support looks very good. --Denkmalhelfer 12:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info stitching errors removed -- KlausFoehl 14:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI now. --Milseburg 16:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you for removing the stitching error; it is QI now. As my oppose is futile now and as it was sent to CR because of me, I can be speedily promoted tomorrow (at least 48 hours after the first
  •  Support Good Quality --Derzno 09:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support supporting vote of Hubertl) --Cccefalon 04:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 8 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Canny-sur-Thérain (5).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Espaces verts et parcs à Canny-sur-Thérain . PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Strong compression, no detail. --Kadellar 09:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree --Hubertl 14:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose see Hubertl --Denkmalhelfer 12:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    ??? My vote was disagreeing the opposiong from Kandellar. --Hubertl 19:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you Hubert1 this proves that some photographers do not look the proposed images.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The stairs of the slide are a bit disturbing but this is not worth to be mentioned. -- Spurzem 21:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too soft, visible artifacts on darker area. Alvesgaspar 14:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose artifacts and lack of details --Christian Ferrer 16:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 22:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Hilton Garden Inn, Konya.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hilton Garden Inn, Konya, Turkey --Bgag 14:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Not very crisp, boring composition --Moroder 21:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I do not agree. IMHO it's a pretty nice image with a good quality. --Halavar 10:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Moroder --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Sharpness meets QI standard and I don't see any problem with the composition. --Code 18:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Question. Is this a hotel or a bycicle and minibus parking lot? I'm disgusted disappointed --Moroder 20:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The only issue I see, if there is, it's the empty area at bottom IMO, however acceptable --Christian Ferrer 16:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 22:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)