Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 09 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Singapore: Central Fire Station in Hill Street --Cccefalon 00:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hans-und-Sophie-Scholl-Square -- Dr. Chriss 00:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 00:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to the Central Station The Hague with the tram viaduct --Hubertl 00:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Babylon at the Central Station The Hague --Hubertl 00:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anton Menger, Bust (white marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 00:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anne Brucy, journaliste --Brucyn 22:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good portrait. A relation? --Daniel Case 03:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lac dans le parc naturel régional du Haut-Jura --Brucyn 22:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion A lot of potential traps avoided --Daniel Case 03:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Terraced houses in Macclesfield --Daniel Case 21:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hauptwache in Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 20:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 22:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gutenberg monument in Frankfurt, Hesse, Germany. --NorbertNagel 20:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 21:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adult male lion on a rock. --Clément Bardot 19:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Crop a bit tight maybe. --NorbertNagel 20:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 18:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Clément Bardot 19:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Icehouse of Culroya, Fuendetodos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 18:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 19:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Moros, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 18:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Sagunto, España --Poco a poco 18:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 19:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal in Via_Pignolo 84 in Bergamo --Moroder 17:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European green lizard (Lacerta viridis) --Uoaei1 17:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 18:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Torre dell'Orologio" in Brescia --Moroder 17:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Basilica of Notre-Dame de Fourvière in Lyon, France. --Clément Bardot 17:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aristolochia steupii. Wild-growing plant in the woods near Sochi. --Sergei Kazantsev 16:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aquilegia olympica. Wild-growing plant of Caucasus Biosphere Reserve. The picture is made in the Western department of the reserve near Mount Fisht. --Sergei Kazantsev 16:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beautiful new leaf unfurling of sterile fern Polystichum setiferum 'Bevis Pulcherrimum'.
Famberhorst 15:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 15:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Beautiful new leaf unfurling of sterile fern Polystichum setiferum 'Bevis Pulcherrimum'.
-
- Nomination Kroezeboom (border tree). European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Location, Kroondomein (Netherlands).
Famberhorst 15:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 15:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Kroezeboom (border tree). European beech (Fagus sylvatica). Location, Kroondomein (Netherlands).
-
- Nomination Boven-Slinge in Woold near Winterswijk, Gelderland, Netherlands --XRay 15:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vragenderveen near Vragender, Gelderland, Netherlands --XRay 15:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Porta des Moll in Alcúdia, Majorca -- MJJR 14:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bagnas National Nature Reserve. Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 12:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 12:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peñalara from Lozoya valley, Community of Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 12:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Madonna at a building in the Flinsbachstraße --Berthold Werner 09:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- Spurzem 12:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door on the north facade of Drottningholm Palace Theatre. --ArildV 20:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade details of the neue Burg, Vienna --Hubertl 08:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Franz Anton Felix Edler von Zeiller, bust(white marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 08:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heinrich Siegel (1830-1899), bust (white marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 08:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tjörnbron (the Tjörn bridge) --ArildV 08:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head of Constantine in Musei Capitolini --Livioandronico2013 07:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head of Hadrian in Musei Capitolini --Livioandronico2013 07:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome in Musei Capitolini --Livioandronico2013 07:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Its not your fault, that the light conditions are not overall the same. --Hubertl 10:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch of Septimius Severus (Rome) in the night --Livioandronico2013 07:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archbasilica of St. John Lateran --Livioandronico2013 07:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former jesuit college in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former jesuit college in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former jesuit college in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former jesuit college in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 15:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former jesuit college in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 07:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaaba --مانفی 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Comment It lacks contrast. --MB-one 12:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Contrast and details are missing. IMO not fixable. (Sorry for the additional review, but I've seen the problem of contrast first too, but in the detail view too much quality is missing.)--XRay 15:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC) --XRay 15:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery of the guardians of the convict prison on île Saint-Joseph, French Guiana. Devil's Island (île du Diable) in the background. --Cayambe 06:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Traditional alpine dairy at Hinterwachsenberg #3, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renaissance granary from 1586 at Hart #2, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacristan house at Wachsenberg #23, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman Catholic parish church Saint Andrew and cemetery at Wachsenberg, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and composition.--ArildV 08:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman Catholic rectory, Steuerberg, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower Primula margotae (x) Garryarde Guinevere. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.
Famberhorst 04:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support looks fine. --Denkmalhelfer 05:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower Primula margotae (x) Garryarde Guinevere. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley.
-
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Forest.
Famberhorst 04:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Location Dieverzand. Forest.
-
- Nomination Living branches on decaying alder (Alnus) Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst. In a balanced biotope can not live without death.
Famberhorst 04:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Living branches on decaying alder (Alnus) Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst. In a balanced biotope can not live without death.
-
- Nomination Panorama of Manhattan skyline from Brooklyn. --King of Hearts 04:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Dustspots (see note) --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Fixed King of Hearts 05:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunkers in Fort No 1, Lévis, Québec, Canada --Bgag 03:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ulm Museum in Ulm, Germany -- Dr. Chriss 00:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 08:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schwörhaus in Ulm, Germany -- Dr. Chriss 00:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ximonic 10:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schweriner Schloß --Ralf Roletschek 20:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schweriner Schloß --Ralf Roletschek 20:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Might need a small perspective correction since the walls seem to be leaning. Also, on the right there are some black spots. Dust spots? The light is very nice. --Ximonic 21:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --Ximonic 23:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schweriner Schloß --Ralf Roletschek 20:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion There are some dust spots here too. --Ximonic 21:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Done --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Support --Ximonic 23:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hermitage of the Virgin of the Rock, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Cabellera, Aniés, Huesca, Spain. --Poco a poco 20:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.it would have been an excellent photo with another crop imo, I dont like really like the tight right crop but otherwise very nice--ArildV 07:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Moros, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 20:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Kadellar 12:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oberlandesgericht in Munich, Germany --Dr. Chriss 18:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline to me its too strong distorted. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Stitching errors. Please refrain from nominating more buildings before not properly checked your stitching work. --Cccefalon 02:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BR-Tower in Munich, Germany --Dr. Chriss 18:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline to me its too strong distorted. --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Several stitching errors. I marked one. --Cccefalon 01:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kameha hotel in Bonn, Germany --Dr. Chriss 18:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 02:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Richèl Hogenkamp at the Madrid Open 2015, Madrid, Spain. --Kadellar 15:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality + Comment is the level of noise normal for ISO 400 with the 60D? --C messier 16:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I had to brighten shadows a bit (face), that causes some extra noise, I reduced it but not too much, to avoid losing detail. --Kadellar 09:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Formation géologique calcaire sur les pentes du Pinet, dans le parc naturel régional de Chartreuse. --Brucyn 13:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp and strong CA. --Kadellar 15:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC) New version uploaded I tried to correct CA and sharpness. Could you have an another look ? --Brucyn 16:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
CA fine now, thank you. But it is unsharp, sorry. --Kadellar 09:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Group trees at the edge of the coast. Location Mirnser Cliff.
Famberhorst 04:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion --ArildV 07:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Group trees at the edge of the coast. Location Mirnser Cliff.
-
- Nomination Volkertmarkt, Vienna, --Hubertl 00:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volkertmarkt, Vienna, Youth Center --Hubertl 00:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Цвітіння тюльпанів в парку інституту ім. В. П. Філатова, Одеса. By User:Haidamac --Ahonc 22:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice work in difficult light --Daniel Case 21:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laughing Dove (Spilopelia senegalensis). Seyhan - Adana, Turkey. --Zcebeci 19:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Got the bird in focus; nice colors --Daniel Case 21:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome of San Paolo alla Regola (Rome) --Livioandronico2013 19:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Blown-out windows in center --Daniel Case 21:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Domänenstraße 97 --Berthold Werner 14:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Tilted to the left. Please correct. --NorbertNagel 18:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Done --Berthold Werner 17:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 13:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Trier, Domänenstraße 97 --Berthold Werner 14:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Chiesa di San Giorgio church by Ottavio Amigoni in Brescia --Moroder 11:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Nice setup but blown right rear window --Daniel Case 21:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfall of Cavaterra in Nepi- rocks --Livioandronico2013 06:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe a little bit noisy and unsharp on the top left, but overally good --Brucyn 12:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfall of cavaterra in Nepi --Livioandronico2013 06:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe you can crop the overexposed top left corner --Brucyn 12:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Normalmente --Brucyn una foto che si può "recuperare" non si declina ma si suggerisce un'eventuale problema comunque Done --Livioandronico2013 20:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Sto imparando ;) Adesso mi pare che sia bene --Brucyn 21:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vragenderveen near Vragender, Gelderland, Netherlands --XRay 05:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Bottom unsharp leaves are disturbing, maybe a crop would help. --C messier 16:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your review. --XRay 15:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Countru view in the village of Idanha-a-Velha, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 17:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)* Comment very good image, but sorry, without brightening the dark areas I can´t give you a QI-promotion. --Hubertl 14:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Not done --Daniel Case 03:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Slovak National Theatre --Albertus teolog 22:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
CA, see, e.g., verticals in left hand side. -- Slaunger 19:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Slovak National Theatre --Albertus teolog 22:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Common frog (Rana temporaria), WWT London Wetland, Barnes --Charlesjsharp 10:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Review Comment It's a good picture, but I'm not sure if it's QI: CAs (see notes); I don't understand 1/640 sec - ISO 800 (F14, but DOF is not very good)--Lmbuga 16:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I can't find the Cyan CA. The 'Green CA' looks like a bit of grass. --Charlesjsharp 08:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Iglesia_de_Santa_María,_Gdansk,_Polonia,_2013-05-20,_DD_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Church of St Mary, Gdansk, Poland. --Poco a poco 17:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Bad light conditions, deformed by perspective correction, not convincing composition. Sorry --Moroder 20:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- New version uploaded, should be enough for QI IMHO Poco a poco 20:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I think it's good enough for QI, I would suggest a tighter crop though. --MB-one 16:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support looks fine for me. --Denkmalhelfer 05:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Weißstorch im Anflug auf Nest (3).jpg
[edit]- Nomination White storks in Lower Saxony. --Hydro 07:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Comment
- Oppose IMO too bright. Details missing.--XRay 08:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose see Xray and not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 12:53, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support It is sharp. Good composition. Overexposed parts good enough for QI. --Kadellar 00:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough imo. Alvesgaspar 13:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Waterfall_of_Cavaterra_in_Nepi_-_end.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Waterfall of Cavaterra in Nepi - end --Livioandronico2013 06:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 06:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but some areas are clearly overexposed, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 07:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose same as poco --Denkmalhelfer 07:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose A very nice picture but I have to agree with the opposers. Alvesgaspar 13:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Kłodzko,_klasztor_klarysek,_07.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Saints George and Adalbert church in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose disagree, strong shadow and noisy. --Denkmalhelfer 10:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support there are neither strong shadows nor too much noise for QI --Hubertl 14:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Neither too strong shadow nor any noise. Another hilarous oppose. --Cccefalon 00:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 18:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Wiener Rathaus 2007 Detail b.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Rathaus, Vienna --Tsui 22:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry incline and partly not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 10:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC) – This vote is unintelligible for me and should in my opinion not be allowed. -- Spurzem 16:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Perspective distortions from this position are ok, the main subject, the figure is completely sharp.--Hubertl 15:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral
perspective distortions?.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC) - Support I had decided to take not part here any longer. But if I see diverse votes I can not keep to myself. The composition of this image is very good. Where will you have perspective corrections? -- Spurzem 13:43, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Just curious: Can someone point me to an image of a similar subject (relatively close-up of a statue in front of a corresponding and several meters high part of the building's façade it is part of, seen from below, from ground, respectively a visitors, level) that is not "distorted"? Where the statue does not get unnaturally distorted, when correcting the buildings lines. -Tsui (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I don't know why this troll is doing reviews, but I already pointed out some days ago to him, that total perspective correction is not asked in QI for photos that are taken from a very close distance. Also, I would be very happy, if all photos here would have this level of sharpness --Cccefalon 23:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:26, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Münster,_Westdeutsche_Lotterie_--_2015_--_5720.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Office building of the Westdeutsche Lotterie in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Bold perspective, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose not for me, sorry, because of bold perspective... Needs a debate, IMO.--Jebulon 20:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, incline no QI --Denkmalhelfer 10:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, perspective. --Code 18:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortions too bad.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Erythronium tuolumnense White Beauty. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tuolumnense Erythronium White Beauty. Location, Garden Tuinreservaat Jonker Valley.
Famberhorst 04:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC) - Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 07:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm afraid the white balance is wrong (green cast). Maybe should we discuss...--Jebulon 20:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Famberhorst can you check? thanks --Livioandronico2013 08:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Answer: the greenish drawing in the flour should be. That is the charm of this cultivar. See the two other pictures (below).--Famberhorst 15:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose looks green and partly not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 10:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support I see no lack! -- Spurzem 21:27, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support WB ok imo. It just could be enhanced be cropping 10px tighter on the right side to get rid of the wedge shaped white in the upper part. But anyhow QI. --Cccefalon 00:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support OK for me --Isiwal 08:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Bratyslawa_Dom_u_Dobrego_Pasterza.JPG
[edit]- Nomination House of the Good Shepherd --Albertus teolog 22:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 07:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft in focus, shallow DoF, and some CA. Lets discuss. -- Slaunger 19:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose left part (stairs) very dark and noisy --Denkmalhelfer 10:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Slaunger --DKrieger 20:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose It needs a perspective correction --Moroder 22:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
File:2015-02-28_Electric_Avenue_Museumsquartier_Wien_Kunstmeile_9519.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Electric Avenue, Museumsquartier, Vienna --Hubertl 07:28, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Strong reflection of the flashlight on the metal --Denkmalhelfer 15:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC). Yes, there is a flashlight. So what? Übrigens: In Deutschland herrscht Vermummungsverbot. Benötigen wir hier Abstimmsocken? --Hubertl 20:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The quality is ok, but your
photobag and your own jacketflashlight is distracting. Sorry, You should take care of such details. --Denkmalhelfer (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)- Comment What are you talking about? --Hubertl 13:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support What's the problem? It's good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Nottingham railway station MMB 90 170519 222018.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nottingham railway station. Mattbuck 07:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Too much contrast between roof and rest, hard shadows --Denkmalhelfer 15:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Discussion neccessary. --Hubertl 20:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Mattbuck, please lighten the shadows a bit, it will be QI for me then.--Hubertl 22:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --Kadellar 00:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support Fine to me, as well. Alvesgaspar 14:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Geranium pratense 20140704 481.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Flower of Wood cranesbill (Geranium sylvaticum). --Bff 14:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{o}}2,048 × 1,536 pixels. The minimum resolution for submissions is 4 megapixels. Too tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 15:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote. --LC-de 22:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I don't apply the rule. Flowers of Geranium sylvaticum have 2-3 cm. With 3 cm is 4 megapixels too? This is QIC! The picture don't has good composition IMO, but it's a good picture--Lmbuga 16:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lmbuga. --Code 18:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me, the new rule is not in force. Alvesgaspar 11:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral Ok Alvesgaspar. Composition, see below --Lmbuga 13:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Probably downsampled, but good--Jebulon 14:20, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Bad Wörishofen, Klosterkirche, Fresko - Geißelung.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Fresco Flagellation of Christ in the monastery church of Bad Wörishofen -- Spurzem 09:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- OpposeToo blurred. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Where? Perhaps you should get new glasses? ;-) I ask to discuss. -- Spurzem 21:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Ah, I see. The fresco painter used a resolution not sufficient for QI. Additionally his brush strokes were a bit uneven and blurred -> too much alcohol? No, taking a look at the edges I dont think its blurred, even if its starting to loose contours due to ISO noise. But this is IMHO still tolerable in this case. --LC-de 11:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support OK for me --Rjcastillo 15:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose In my opinion the image lacks contrast, probably as a result of the poor lighting conditions. It is possible to fix though. Alvesgaspar 22:04, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- weak Support --Hubertl 22:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Alvesgaspar --MB-one 12:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Chroma noise. Why ISO800? Object is not jumping around. -- Smial 10:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good 4 me. --Palauenc05 05:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Dark, unsharp, noisy. --PereslavlFoto 10:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, sorry.--Jebulon 14:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Unsharp? Perhaps you should clean your glasses. But OK: If you think it is too bad, please decline. We have so much promoted images which are not better that we don't need this one. -- Spurzem 22:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Alvesgaspar --Gzzz 19:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Ξυλόσκαλο 3751.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fog on Lefka Ori, Crete. --C messier 13:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry but: no meaningful file naming, stains, uncalibrated Colorspace. --F. Riedelio 15:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Name is in greek (i think this acceptable) and is the name of the place (+ image number from the camera). Uncalibrated Colorspace maybe due to RawTherapee, I think I can fix it. Can you note the stains on the picture? --C messier 18:38, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I note some stains on the picture. --F. Riedelio 15:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose fog blow out half of the picture --Denkmalhelfer (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment @F. Riedelio, thank you for your review. Cloned out the noted features, although I think it is more possible that these were real world objects, propably garbage. I cannot fix the color space in EXIF data, but sRGB was selected when saving from RawTherapee. --C messier 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Denkmalhelfer, I can't understand your comment. There is visible structure in the fog (which is also the subject of the image) and as is a thick fog it covers the top of the hills/mountains. I don't see a technical shortcoming there. --C messier 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment here we are not talking about creative or idea behin the picture, it is pure quality of the pciture. And this is not good due too half of the picture flooded in white fog. --Denkmalhelfer 12:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support with less of the half of the picture flooded in white fog. --Ralf Roletschek 11:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support as Ralf.. It was the fog that makes you capture this moment. --Hubertl 15:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Even the front of the image, which is not affected by the fog is unsharp and undetailed. Alvesgaspar 22:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support Not bad, just foggy. --Hockei 13:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- weak Support. Contrast and sharpness in foreground could be better, but ok for QI. --MB-one 11:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alve --Livioandronico2013 20:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support I see no issues neither quality nor visual --Christian Ferrer 06:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose As said above. --Palauenc05 05:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much fog, not aimed enough on the road and buildings... bad bottom crop --Gzzz 19:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)