Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 04 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2021_Rybnik,_Dawny_zespół_szpitalny_Juliusz,_Budynek_główny_02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The main building. Former hospital complex "Julius". Rybnik, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 17:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The sculpture is lacking sharpness als well as the image has a very low level of detail. --Augustgeyler 18:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. The image is no FP but because of the good composition QI though the sharpness is not the best. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New version uploaded with better sharpness. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 19:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment The sculpture is still unsharp. --Augustgeyler 21:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Quite sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 20:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Église_Saint-Urbain_(Muntzenheim)_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination St. Urban Church of Muntzenheim (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 06:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The image is slightly  Underexposed --Augustgeyler 12:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Support You uploaded a new version. Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 06:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 09:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I like the photo, but there is a halo on top of the stork. I realize that's a detail, but if you could fix that, that would be great! -- Ikan Kekek 08:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 13:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)