Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 31 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2023-02-01_Handball,_Bundesliga_Frauen,_Thüringer_HC_-_HSG_Bensheim-Auerbach_1DX_2981_by_Stepro.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Handball, Bundesliga Women, Thüringer HC - HSG Bensheim/Auerbach: Vilma Matthijs Holmberg (Thüringer HC, 11). By --Stepro 17:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose i want to see top of her head, where is top of her head? --Modern primat 20:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment I accept all refusals for technical reasons. But this isn't one. Personal taste is not a criterion according to Commons:Image guidelines. A close-up portrait is a common genre, see e.g. the second photo in the article w:Head shot. That's why I put the rejection up for discussion. --Stepro 00:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The Commons:Image guidelines Composition section, among other problems, contains "Too tight crop". Sorry, but IMO it is the case. I hate criticizing images on composition grounds and quite rarely do so, as there are many aspects really depending on taste and individual perceptions, but I don't see how cropping of the head might work for this image quality. The other reason is motion blur (neck, chin) --LexKurochkin 10:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Action shot with excellent composition, good sharpness, perfect focus, good colours, and good exposure. What vital information has been lost due to cropping? Blue hair fluff at the top of the haircut, or even a bald head? --Smial 11:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial --Milseburg 14:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. It is inessential to see the top of her head. -- Ikan Kekek 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per Smial. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 23:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose A technically well taken picture. But I have to agree with LexKurochkin, we also have to consider basic aspects of composition and framing. --Augustgeyler 19:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)