Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 30 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Guttaring Deinsberg Friedhof Karner Ost-Ansicht 21032017 6774.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Romanesque charnel house at the cemetery in Deinsberg, Guttaring, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I can't live with these dominating twigs in front of the main subject, IMO not a QI composition for me. Others may think differently, though. --Basotxerri 08:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Die Geschmäcker sind verschieden. Für mich wirkt ein Vordergrund wie diese Zweige belebend. Deshalb bitte diskutieren. -- Spurzem 10:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment @Spurzem: Thanks for giving this image a second chance. --Johann Jaritz 10:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment It's absolutely OK to do so, perhaps it's more a question of taste. Let's see the result of the discussion. --Basotxerri 10:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment @Basotxerri: I wonder how the result will be. As you say: "De gustibus non disputandum." --Johann Jaritz 11:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support For me it's OK, I don't mind the branches. --Palauenc05 21:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I find it fine. Not liking the tree branches in front of the house is a matter of taste, as mentioned above. -- Ikan Kekek 02:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support While Basotxerri has a point and the guidelines say that disturbing foreground objects (which these branches are) can be reason to decline, there's also the matter of naturally ocurring phenomena. It would be wrong for photographers to go around chopping down trees and branches in order to get a better shot; these branches are there and we'll just have to live with that. If it's not possible to get a shot from this angle without them, so be it. :) --Peulle 11:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 Comment @Peulle: You nailed it! Thank you for that genuine comment. -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)