Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 28 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Stone bull's head rhyton archmus Heraklion.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination The stone bull's head rhyton, archaeological museum of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.--Jebulon 09:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion

 SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
*  Oppose Sorry Jebulon, WB is off. IMHO, it (the stone head) is too blue/green. --C messier 12:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  •  Comment Sorry to disagree, C messier. The background is very blue and cold in real, and there are a lot of blue/green reflections on the subject. I'll try to change, but only a little.--Jebulon 17:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I used the horns as reference. --C messier 17:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done for you ! --Jebulon 17:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support OK now the blue/green background doesn't help --C messier 17:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Thx.The original bg was very ugly and dirty, with reflections of the glass. But it is blue/green... And I had some blue/green reflections on the object itself, I hope you understand.--Jebulon 19:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The only opposer change one's mind --Livioandronico2013 22:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 02:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Žemaičių Kalvarija Church 2, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Žemaičių Kalvarija Church. Lithuania. (by Diliff) --Pofka 17:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
    Could you increase the top end contrast? There seems to be a loss of detail due to brightness. Mattbuck 19:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done --Mattbuck 12:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support All details are clearly visible. --Palauenc05 19:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Mattbuck. The westwork is too bright so that the lesenes don't contrast with the wall. -- Spurzem 19:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too bright --Σπάρτακος 12:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Quality to me. Some seem a little too nit picky. Bsmalley 02:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Hubertl 13:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:De_Soto_Club_Coupe_de_1948,_Helsinki,_Finlandia,_2012-08-14,_DD_01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination De Soto Club Coupe of 1948, Helsinki, Finnland --Poco a poco 09:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Halavar 09:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry. But is no QI for me because of the very short lense. Further the car is too bright in front and a bit noisy. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 10:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Very sorry, but Spurzem absolutely right for me,too much noise.--Livioandronico2013 10:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 14:42, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
     NeutralBetter --Livioandronico2013 20:04, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As for Spurzem. Too noisy for an object that can not run away, unsufficiant perspective. -- Smial 14:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Something in me say: This distorted image shows exactly the bullyish and typical character of this car: "Get lost when I come!"--Hubertl 15:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 01:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)