Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 27 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Albi_cathédrale_Sainte-Cécile_portal_vault.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Gothic vault above portal of Albi cathedral --Isiwal 20:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:07, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Clear and sharp enough, but I dislike the composition/crop. It needs a perfect symmetry IMO. Anyway, let's discuss, please.--Jebulon 21:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I respect your opinion, but my intention is to show the transition from vault to bow of portal also --Isiwal 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support for me its ok, especially whith the expressed intention of the photographer.--Hubertl 08:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 17:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:11, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 01:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Morfa_NefynLB01.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Morfa Nefyn, Llyn, Gwynedd, Wales. By User:Lesbardd --Llywelyn2000 20:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Hubertl 20:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
    I disagree. Horizont tilts on left side. --Milseburg 14:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
    Straightened. Llywelyn2000 09:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 22:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Horizon is okay now. But what about the 2 MP limit? --Milseburg 12:06, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 17:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Less of 2 MP...Palauenc05,Hubertl,Ralf Roletschek,Spurzem can you check your vote please?--Σπάρτακος 21:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose thanks for the information. --Hubertl 21:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @ Lesbardd, Llywelyn2000: Why was it reduced to 493 KB (originally: 2.15 MB)? Please restore the original size.--Palauenc05 17:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cymru am Byth ! but too small, and strongly tilted.--Jebulon 10:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 14:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Mouflon Corse.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Portrait of a European Mouflon, France. --Clément Bardot 18:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --XRay 18:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Wrongly focused IMO. Bad setting of DoF. I wish a discussion, please.--Jebulon 21:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Great portrait! --Palauenc05 13:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Minor overexposure, but not disturbing. Nose is not absolutely sharp, but the eyes are sharp enough. Cannot see e problem with DoF. -- Smial 21:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice and QI for me. -- Spurzem 22:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:White-necked_jacobin_(Florisuga_mellivora_mellivora)_male_Tr.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination White-necked jacobin (Florisuga mellivora flabellifera), Trinidad --Charlesjsharp 14:10, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Shadow parts are underexposed. Need to be fixed. --Hockei 14:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
    Have adjusted brightness, but ask for second opinion on whether parts are underexposed. Looks OK to me (but it would!) --Charlesjsharp 20:58, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice bird and good quality for me. -- Spurzem 13:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I wonder, why you didn't vote before this unnecessary cr. --Hockei 17:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
I am old indeed but I am so busy that there is no time enough to look at every image carefully at once. Further I think that we have a lot of users who can help to vote. -- Spurzem 17:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Glyptothek,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2013-02-02,_DD_15.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Torso of a sphinx from the northwest corner of the roof of the temple on Aegina, large terracotta, circa 500 BC. Glyptothek Munich Nr. 96, Munich, Germany. --Poco a poco 19:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:44, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Oppose for now. Should be identified, at least a little. Furthermore I don't think the point of view is accurate. I need a discussion, please.--Jebulon 12:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Poco a poco 19:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition for me, good lighting and good sharpness. -- Spurzem 21:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Hypolycaena amasa.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Hypolycaena amasa, Malaysia --Jjgodox 19:54, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • would benefit by cropping --Charlesjsharp 10:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Not done Mattbuck 19:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough, a wide crop is far better than a too narrow one. --Palauenc05 18:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good composition for me and good quality -- Spurzem 21:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 12:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Carmine_skimmer_(Orthemis_discolor)_male_side.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Carmine skimmer (Orthemis discolor) male, Tobago --Charlesjsharp 13:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Jacek Halicki 14:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The stem is overexposed and the insect underexposed. --Hockei 20:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Exposure adjusted. --Charlesjsharp 21:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Can't you brighten the dragonfly? It is definitely too dark for me. Hockei (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I could naturally, but think the colour is true to life and about right. --Charlesjsharp 17:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:14-08-05-cerdanyola-RalfR-024.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sierra de Collserola, Cerdanyola del Vallès --Ralf Roletschek 15:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Bad file name, bad description, "024" is not enough. We are not here only for judging pictures, a QI is a whole.--Jebulon 15:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I forgot about it, here's the competition of the excellent file name. Who cares about a photo? --Ralf Roletschek 16:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Description is accurate, why decline? Quality is more than OK. --Tuxyso 23:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Please correct the verticals Alvesgaspar 14:30, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
    • Accurate description ? Are you kidding ? "Cerdanyola" is a description ? Please less pseudo copyright template warnings on file page, and more info about the image !!--Jebulon 23:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeSorry it(s too much tilted.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 14:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Genome numbered.svg

[edit]

  • Nomination From DNA to Life --Medium69 15:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Hubertl 15:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Derivative work of [1], not his own creation. Sorry. (@Medium69: try Featured image perhaps ?) --Thibaut120094 15:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
    The creation of SVG is mine, and the source used is indicated.--Medium69 00:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 02:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)