Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 26 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Mompach Wegekreuz1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Wayside shrine at Mompach, Luxembourg. --Palauenc05 17:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Comment WB should be fixed.--Ermell 20:14, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment I've slightly corrected it and checked on different monitors. --Palauenc05 16:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
      •  Comment
        Appears a bit too yellow/green. The object is leaning in as well. No problem to fix.--Ermell 20:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment I have rechecked the colours: They are absolutely authentic. I cannot see any "leaning in" either. As the shrine is almost 400 years old and composed from different components, it actually is not straight from top to bottom. What shall I do? Compose an artificial picture? --Palauenc05 21:09, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
          •  Comment
            Looks more like cushion distorshion cause the wideangle is quite close to the object. Other opinions?--Ermell 20:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support The subject is not perfectly square. Sure it could have been taken with a different lens/position, but it's high quality as is. Ram-Man 16:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree --Ermell 16:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment It also looks wrong in my (calibrated) monitor, too yellowish Poco a poco 19:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose WB probably set to "Aufnahme im Schatten" as it is called in my camera. Slight perspective problem, camera pointed somewhat down. -- Smial 09:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Not the best lighting but QI for me -- Spurzem 20:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Lady_Caroline_yacht_in_Coal_Harbour,_Burrard_Inlet.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Lady Caroline yacht in Coal Harbour, Burrard Inlet --Riley Huntley 04:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Comment Good, but it's leaning in at the right. --XRay 06:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see the issue. The right side is closer to the camera and the lines are not parallel to the horizon at this perspective. Ram-Man 16:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose An additional issue: There are significant CAs too. --XRay 13:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:2014_Wank,_Hotel_Eclectica_(02).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Eclectica Hotel. Vank/Vəngli, Nagorno-Karabakh. --Halavar 09:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 10:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
    •  Comment Sorry, I do not agree. I think it's sharp enough. I think we need more opinions. --Halavar 12:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unsharp. --Jacek Halicki 12:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough beyond a doubt. Ram-Man 02:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support not very sharp but not unsharp Christian Ferrer 08:44, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough. Riley Huntley 22:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not really sharp, tilted and the crop is too tight, sorry not a QI to me Poco a poco 18:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  weak support for me is accetable --Livioandronico2013 20:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Sharp enough. --Stepro 02:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak  Oppose. Somewhat overexposed, weak sharpness, halos (fog) in high contrast areas. -- Smial 09:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 07:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)