Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 26 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Novice_butterfly_(Amauris_ochlea)_male_underside.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Novice butterfly (Amauris ochlea) male underside, Mabibi, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa --Charlesjsharp 13:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Less than 2MP. --KTC 15:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC))
    Sorry, uploaded small file in error. Big one there now. --Charlesjsharp 17:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 22:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 12:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted KTC (talk) 12:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Citrus_swallowtail_Christmas_butterfly_(Princeps_papilio_demodocus)_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Citrus swallowtail Christmas butterfly (Princeps papilio demodocus), iSimangaliso Wetland Park, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa --Charlesjsharp 13:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Less than 2MP. --KTC 15:16, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry, uploaded small file in error. Big one there now. --Charlesjsharp 17:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 22:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted KTC 12:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Lago del Predil mit Kanone 10032015 0495.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Howitzer on the Lake Predil with Cinque Punte in the background, Tarvisio, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy --Johann Jaritz 10:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 17:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)  Oppose In my eyes it would be better to show the howitzer completely. --Milseburg 14:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for your assessment. Version with complete howitzer uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support IQ for me now.--Milseburg 12:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 17:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 23:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 13:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Friedhof_Oejendorf_Beweinung_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hamburg, main cemetery Öjendorf, small memorial --Dirtsc 21:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Comment crop the top and the down the picture will be perhaps better--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Not done--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
     Comment With a tighter crop you won't have a good idea of the position of the monument between the open lawn and the tall trees. --Dirtsc 16:21, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose most of the leaves have been overexposed, it's a bit disturbing --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --C messier 13:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Opiliones 20100626.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Gregarious scene of Opiliones under a stone in Losar de la Vera, Cáceres, Spain. By User:Luis Fernández García --Kadellar 22:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not QI for me, no sharpness etc. --Charlesjsharp 16:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  CommentSome are sharp, some aren't, it's a group. More opinions, please. --Kadellar 14:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support--Moroder 06:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support You can’t get each specimen sharp in such a macro shot --Kreuzschnabel 06:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- As above, little can be seen of the creatures -- Alvesgaspar 14:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As above too. --Hockei 17:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 13:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:2015_Knabe_in_Gefahr_Remseck.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture "Knabe in Gefahr" ("Boy in Danger") --Kreuzschnabel 12:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion

* Oppose Slightly inclined --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:23, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

    •  CommentHaving de-tilted this carefully, I must ask which side it is inclined for you. I don’t see any inclination.
      •  Comment please see ma note I think it's slightly inclined 1 or 2°.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)--Kreuzschnabel 17:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
        • Having had another look I still don’t see anything inclined in the areas you annotated. The handrail support is not vertical, as you can easily see by the other ones leading into the bridge. The pedestals edges are not perfectly straight. And the background windows are so unsharp you can easily take something else for one of their edges but for me they are perfectly upright too. Btw, 1 or 2 degrees would be awfully tilted. We are talking about tenths of a degree, if any. --Kreuzschnabel 07:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
          •  Neutral OK! We are talking about tenths of a degree. I remain neutral (although the sky is not contrasted, and blurry) --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
            •  Comment The sky was overcast with grey clouds, even if it was sunny at the spot where I was standing. Even the bridge at 20 m distance is blurred, why do you expect a sky of some kms distance to be not? --Kreuzschnabel 13:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
              •  Comment I understand! Does this constitute an excuse to give IQ? This is why I remain neutral in my judgment!--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
                •  Comment It’s not an excuse, it’s a photographic fact. Usually, in portrait photography, we try to get out-of-focus backgrounds. --Kreuzschnabel 15:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Face too dark, background disturbing. -- Spurzem 19:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment Face too dark? Are you joking? Firstly, every feature of the face is visible, secondly, blame the artist for turning the boy’s face towards the ground so it will be always in shade. The background is the Rems bridge, which is the very surrounding they decided to place this sculpture in, so I decided to show it behind the boy. Set to Discuss now. --Kreuzschnabel 20:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Of course the background is distracting, but the statue is where it is. The lighting is also difficult, but the photographer has to take the photo from where he is standing to show the bee. It's a sharp image and I think QI. I see no tilt. --Charlesjsharp 12:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. The background is OK for me, for me it is not really distracting --DKrieger 19:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- Not only the background is distrating but the framing makes it worse. Another angle making the face more visible would be better. Alvesgaspar 14:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 13:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)