Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 15 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:McLaren_Senna,_GIMS_2018,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(1X7A0404).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination McLaren Senna at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 10:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 10:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
    @Peulle: I always see the complaints when a line hangs only 2 or 3 degrees to the left or right. But is the background here and are the people on the left in particular okay? -- Spurzem 15:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Mostly, yes. I did think about the perspective and maybe that should be tweaked a bit, but the people are not really disturbing the subject.--Peulle 07:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
 Comment Applied perspective correction. --MB-one 17:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support--Peulle 21:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

File:PORLAMAR_04.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination I, the copyright holder of this work --Wilfredor 01:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. Low resolution, not sharp enough and please use template {{Information}}. --XRay 04:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
    this image has 20 years, We should evaluate old image on a different way. Thanks --Wilfredor 00:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment At least the {{Information}} (machine readable data, multi-language environment, ...) should be used. --XRay 09:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose JPG artifacts, rather low resolution and detail, sorry. --Smial 17:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined XRay 06:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Podiceps_grisegena_Humber_Bay_Park_Toronto.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Red-necked grebe (Podiceps grisegena) in Humber Bay Park East, Lake Ontario, Toronto --Mykola Swarnyk 05:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose sharpness and colour and crop --Charlesjsharp 21:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support It's no "Featured Picture" but in my opinion good for QI. -- Spurzem 21:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Question - Isn't that too blue? -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose pending a persuasive reply. -- Ikan Kekek 01:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done Uploaded a warmer version.--Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 Comment - It's warmer, but how come none of the other photos in this category seem to show such blue feathers? -- Ikan Kekek 07:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
In fact, it is just gray. But it depends from the reflection and, maybe, angle. I`m not insisting. This picture illustrates, how deep in the water can sit this bird. Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Alright, I've crossed out my vote and will leave the decision up to others. -- Ikan Kekek 16:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 06:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Kakadu_(AU),_Kakadu_National_Park,_Cahills_Crossing_--_2019_--_4140.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 04:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Other bank is out of focus. Sorry. --Ermell 07:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thank you. Sharpness is improved. It's a long distance to the other bank and - BTW - IMO it is enough to have the bank in the foreground sharp. --XRay 08:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Seems good enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support To me it seems that the focus is the near bank, with the flood height warning post, so the selecting blur appears appropriate. --Bobulous 21:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted XRay 06:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Winklern_Am_Kåte_Obstbaumkultur_01032020_8406.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Apple tree at an orchard, Am Kåte in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Seven Pandas 04:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
    The CA in the branches should be removed. --Ermell 22:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Äh, sorry, man kann die Anforderungen aber auch massiv übertreiben. Das Foto hat volle Sensor-Auflösung und das bischen übriggebliebene CA ist wirklich mikroskopisch und vollständig unerheblich. Das Foto muß man schon auf zwei Meter Höhe aufblasen, um "störendes" CA entdecken zu können. Leute! -- Smial 17:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Ps: Ich gehe davon aus, daß Johann da bereits an den richtigen Reglern gezogen hat, und daß das keine Schlamperei des Fotografen ist.
  •  Support CAs? Wo? – Manchmal meine ich, wir kämen in den Anforderungen hier eine Stufe höher als bei den FP, ein anderes Mal staune ich, welcher fotografische Murks durchgewinkt wird. Ich weiß, mit dieser Feststellung wiederhole ich mich. -- Spurzem 19:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Sorry, IMO no disturbing CAs. --XRay 06:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Ermell: I removed the CAs and uploaded a new version. —- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
    •  Support Sorry, bin ich zu pingelig? Von Schlamperei habe ich aber nichts gesagt. Johanns` Arbeit wird von mir sehr geschätzt.--Ermell 21:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
      • Thank you, Reinhard. I do appreciate your photographs as well, your images are among the very best in this forum. -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 17:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Winklern_Gaisrückenstraße_81_Pferdekoppel_01032020_8405.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Paddock on Gaisrückenstrasse #81 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Seven Pandas 04:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
    Please remove the CA. --Ermell 22:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support thanks for fixing--Ermell 07:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Wenn ich darauf hingewiesen werde und nach CAs suche, sehe ich in diesem Bild tatsächlich welche. Wir sollten aber unsere Forderungen auf der einen Seite nicht überspitzen, wenn auf der anderen Seite nichtssagende Bilder mit schwächster Bildkomposition durchgehen. -- Spurzem 19:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Ermell: I removed the CAs and uploaded a new version. —- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --XRay 06:58, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 06:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Winklern_Quellweg_Wanderweg_Eichen_am_Waldrand_01032020_8407.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Oaks at the hiking trail on Quellweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Seven Pandas 04:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
    Please remove the CA. --Ermell 22:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Vielleicht nicht superplusexzellent, für mich aber sehr gut – trotz der mit Mühe erkennbaren leichten CAs. -- Spurzem 19:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Ermell: I removed the CAs and uploaded a new version. —- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO OK--XRay 06:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Thanks.--Ermell 07:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted XRay 06:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)