Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 11 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Hippomobile_Tozeur.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Horse-drawn carriage, Tozeur, Tunisia. --Tsaag Valren 23:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportGood quality. --Smial 01:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose I disagree for now. Please provide some description, geolocation, fix the white triangle on the left top corner and make verticals vertical. Better contrast that would bring some black would help too I think --Podzemnik 08:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Contrast is fine to me (I've been to Tozeur, and Tunisia does have a sandy, sun-bleached look to it, so this looks exactly right). But I agree with Podzemnik's request to make the verticals vertical (a 0.71° anti-clockwise rotation will fix this, there's no need for "perspective correction" in this case). The description seems acceptable to me, but if possible add the specific road name, and geotag the image with precise location coordinates if you know them.--Bobulous 16:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I can not see which perspective should be corrected. -- Spurzem 20:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
@Seven Pandas: I think we had a „support“ by Smial, and now it are two „support“. -- Spurzem 20:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 01:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

File:VW Golf R Oettinger, Berlin (1X7A3947).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination VW Golf R at DRIVE. Volkswagen Group Forum, Berlin --MB-one 14:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 15:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The perspective should be corrected. In addition, the car is a bit too light in the rear area and the cut off head of the visitor at the front looks bad. No QI for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC) –  Neutral Better now -- Spurzem 22:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment The highlights could be reduced somewhat. I also think that the file name is a bit misleading, isn't it...? --Peulle 11:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done addressed all four issues. --MB-one 14:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - A person's head is still cropped, but that doesn't distract me so much as to detract from the quality of the depiction of the car. Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 08:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cropping too tight on the roof of the car and chopping off the person's head is too distracting for me. Both of these issues can be fixed with patience and visualization when you take the image. --GRDN711 04:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   ----Seven Pandas 01:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)