Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 04 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Southern view of the monastery of Augustinian Canons on Kirchplatz #1, Eberndorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern view of the monastery of Augustinian Canons on Kirchplatz #1, Eberndorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern view of the southern exterior gate building at the monastery of Augustinian Canons on Kirchplatz #1, Eberndorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx japonica angustifasciata - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 22:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx japonica japonica - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 22:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx japonica angustifasciata - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 22:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway viaduct in Vorokhta, Ukraine (1). -- George Chernilevsky 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Slight posterization in the sky but hardly noteworthy. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway viaduct in Vorokhta, Ukraine (2). -- George Chernilevsky 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway viaduct in Vorokhta, Ukraine (3). -- George Chernilevsky 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice. Perspective is as should be. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway viaduct in Vorokhta, Ukraine (4). -- George Chernilevsky 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks good. --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old railway viaduct in Vorokhta, Ukraine (5). -- George Chernilevsky 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. Thanks for your contribution of free images to Commons. If you could shoot an "overview! photo of the whole viaduct too, that would be most welcome. :) --Peulle 20:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Masjed-e Jomeh mosque, Yazd, Iran --Poco a poco 19:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hasht Behesht Palace, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 19:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tomb of Cyrus the Great, Pasargadae, Iran --Poco a poco 19:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 20:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golestan Palace, Tehran, Iran --Poco a poco 19:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Building is deformed, but in this case it seriously add something to the composition. --Michielverbeek 20:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II in Milan --Carschten 19:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance detail of the former house of Josef Franke, Gelsenkirchen --Carschten 19:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antique cannon. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
--Famberhorst 18:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Antique cannon. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
-
- Nomination Residential building “Katscha“ in Norrköping, Sweden. --ArildV 16:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Excellent! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Mendiola. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hairs of a sheep on a meadow of the Entzia mountain range, possibly work of vultures. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Most of the picture is unsharp.Sorry --Ermell 20:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sheep skeleton on a meadow of the Entzia mountain range, possibly work of vultures. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 16:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sheep skeleton on a meadow of the Entzia mountain range, possibly work of vultures. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 16:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 16:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kráľova hoľa in winter --CaptainClawHE 15:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The image is OK but it's overcategorised: Kráľova hoľa is already in Low Tatras, so you should remove the category Low Tatras. Please remove the category in the other Low Tatras images of yours, too (there seem to be more). --Basotxerri 16:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done --CaptainClawHE 16:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 18:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Snow Leopard, Panthera uncia, Zoo Karlsruhe --Llez 15:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion IMO the crop could be better but OK for me. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 78+31 German Army NHIndustries NH90 TTH at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 15:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 16:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 78+31 German Army NHIndustries NH90 TTH at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 15:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 16:11, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 78+31 German Army NHIndustries NH90 TTH at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 15:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wahlmanska huset, Hedemora, Sweden. --Vivo 14:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snow vehicle Snow Trac on the Seiser Alm. The Langkofel group in the background --Moroder 12:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Great composition and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Famagusta: ruin of Carmelite Church --A.Savin 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Famagusta: gate on the city walls' ravelin --A.Savin 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Famagusta: St.Peter and Paul Church --A.Savin 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very fine grain but very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Famagusta: ruin of St.George of the Latins Church --A.Savin 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Famagusta: city wall, Othello Tower --A.Savin 12:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe the best of the 5. For FP, I don't love the right crop, but I think it might be featured if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial in Eltmann --Ermell 11:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Comment The wall on the left is very distracting imo. Could you improve the composition?--Moroder 12:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done Cropped a bit which might be better.Thanks for the review.--Ermell 17:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Better indeed --Moroder 17:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmhouse in Viereth --Ermell 11:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residental building in Munich, with contrail --Lucasbosch 11:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Decline I'm sorry, but the recent consensus on CR was to decline it. --A.Savin 12:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Information board about the birds. Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:37, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg, sculpture "Athena" in the commercial area City Nord --Dirtsc 08:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capital in the Doge's Palace (Venice). --Moroder 07:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aarle Rixtel-NL, bell foundry --Michielverbeek 07:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Helvoirt-NL, church --Michielverbeek 07:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
-
- Nomination Bizantine capital on the South facade of the Saint Mark's Basilica in Venice. --Moroder 06:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Stephen at the winged altar of the filial church St. Michael ob Rauchenödt, Upper Austria --Uoaei1 04:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fortification of Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 04:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street sign “PROMENADE DE DÜLMEN”, Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 04:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maas (Meuse), Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 04:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northwestern view of the parish church Saint John the Baptist, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Villa Almrausch on Hauptstrasse #110, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marianne of the Netherlands Gymnasium in Stronie Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marianne of the Netherlands Gymnasium in Stronie Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Left side of the building is not straight (see the note). Also, there are 3 blurred birds on the sky (also see the note). --Halavar 10:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 11:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 13:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alex Scott at the Arsenal v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI match on 19 February 2017 --KTC 23:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment A bit too much noise, can you reduce it?--Peulle 12:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done --KTC 15:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Comment OK.--Peulle 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alex Scott at the Arsenal v Kelly Smith All-Stars XI match on 19 February 2017 --KTC 23:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment A bit too much noise, can you reduce it?--Peulle 12:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done --KTC 15:49, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Comment A bit soft but OK.--Peulle 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golestan Palace, Tehran, Iran --Poco a poco 20:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 20:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment - We featured File:Palacio de Golestán, Teherán, Irán, 2016-09-17, DD 27-36 HDR PAN.jpg, the non-rectilinear version that goes back a little further. Should this one also be featured? -- Ikan Kekek 14:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I think that the subjet and quality are good enough but maybe it is too similar to the other one. In any case I've it categorized in my FP candidates cat Poco a poco 19:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx bakeri - Ventral side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 19:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx clavata - Dorsal side - Female. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 19:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx clavata - Ventral side - Female. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 19:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulyx clavata - Dorsal side - Male. By User:Archaeodontosaurus --Olivier LPB 19:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residental building in Munich, Germany --Lucasbosch 18:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Posterized clouds --Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Mendiola. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Needs perspective adjustment. Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC) - Withdrawn
- Nomination Church of Mendiola. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Recycling recollection point in Ikaztegieta. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 17:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:10, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This Photographs was taken during Wikipedia Takes Kolkata VI Photowalk. By User:Santanupyne --Sumitsurai 17:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Whatever's in the front is too unsharp and distracting to work as the framing device it seems to have been intended to be --Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance to Bamondas Mukherjee Kalibari. By User:Agniswark --Sumitsurai 17:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline OK, you avoided the clipping at the sides ... but at the cost of blown highlights in the middle --Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adi Chitteshwari Temple. By User:Agniswark --Sumitsurai 17:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be sharper, and have less color noise and CA near the edges, but I think you did as well as you could given the circusmtances --Daniel Case 19:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fernando Peres Mitsubishi Evo IX --Harpagornis 21:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Car is in focus; I like that we see the crowd and how close they are, too --Daniel Case 18:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western crowned pigeon (Goura cristata). Jurong Bird Park. Jurong, West Region, Singapore. --Halavar 09:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment The DoF is a little shallow, but not too much considering the angle. A tiny bit of noise reduction is recommended.--Peulle 10:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. -Halavar 16:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Comment OK.--Peulle 19:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door to House No.9 at the Market Square in Eltmann --Ermell 08:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Leaning inward at the left (see the note) --Halavar 10:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Done Could not find the note but tried my best. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 17:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 21:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Support Sorry, I forgot to add that note. My mistake. QI for me --Halavar 14:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seeburger way, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice! I wonder how you get rid of the noise with this high ISO --Moroder 07:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Comment By means of Adobe LR and the NR slider. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fouga CM-170 Magister D-IFCC at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 13:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Looks overprocessed.--Peulle 14:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Improved, I hope. --Julian Herzog 15:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Comment You shouldn't reduce the size to make it look better.--Peulle 17:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Full res for both. --Julian Herzog 08:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Tail is still a bit wonky, but good enough for QI, I think, given that the plane is moving at high speed.--Peulle 19:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fouga CM-170 Magister D-IFCC at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 13:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Looks overprocessed.--Peulle 14:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Improved, I hope. --Julian Herzog 15:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Comment You shouldn't reduce the size to make it look better.--Peulle 17:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Looks OK now.--Peulle 19:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nishi Honganji, Kyoto --663highland 01:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion A little distorted at the edges, but OK --Daniel Case 18:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapultepec aqueduct --Cvmontuy 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Please have a look to the image. It needs perspective corretion. --XRay 07:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Are you sure, the construction is very irregular?
Comment Please sign your comments. And: Yes. Please have a look to the background. It look like the image is leaning out. --XRay 06:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment There are two post that are actualy tilted, but review the semaphore behind and the buildings are ok --Cvmontuy 01:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Weak Support You're right. I think you know that's not the best composition. So it's only weak support. --XRay 16:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Statue of Apollo at the Loggetta by Jacopo Sansovino, under the Campanile di San Marco in Venice --Moroder 18:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Needs perspective correction--Ermell 13:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your review. I tried a PC here but I don't like it. In fact a perspective correction is requested only for architectural images, while done on statues it never works out well , at least imo. Cheers --Moroder 13:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Comment IMO it is an architectural image and the verticals should be vertical. It´s reachable without a big effort and the result will look less unnatural than the original does.--Ermell 20:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)--~~~~
- Review needed
Consensual review
[edit]File:Boljoon_Church,_Cebu.jpg
[edit]- Nomination This is a recent image of the Boljoon church in January 2017. It reflects the best representation of the church on a good day out of the whole category without tight editing. --Adamdaley 01:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Correction of perspective (verticals) and CAs required --Uoaei1 05:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment What is CAs? Adamdaley 05:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment None of the vertical walls are straight. I admit my tripod is slightly off. I've used in-software guidelines to test the vertical lines, and they are not straight, even though the image is slightly off. Anyone willing to "straighten" the image for me? I cannot do it. Adamdaley 06:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment CA means chromatic aberration. With Adobe Lightroom or other SW you can solve both issues. --Uoaei1 07:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I'm working with the .jpg file. Why does everyone insist I use Adobe Lightroom? If someone wants to pass judgement then why not fix it to help since that person doesn't know how to do it in Adobe Photoshop? Thought helping out each other was the key to Commons? I've clearly stated that I am unable to do such fixing with after taking an image. Adamdaley 10:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The idea is to teach people how to fix images themselves. You see, the volume of images here is so high that a few people couldn't possibly help with the editing; the Community therefore rely on the creators doing most of the work themselves. What I can tell you is that it's easier editing images in .RAW format; then you can run perspective correction and everything much easier.--Peulle 10:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I do raw files. Just enough to get contrast done. I only use 3 functions out of the entire program of photoshop. No one can't be bothered to straighten an image for me? Not to worry i use a tripod due to shakey hands. Adamdaley 10:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment We can teach you. :) Check out this page if you're using PhotoShop (you can also look it up on youtube for teaching videos); I learned it just last year and it's easier once you got the hang of it. Then you can fix all your own images and it's a lot easier to get them through QI. :) --Peulle 11:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I do raw files. Just enough to get contrast done. I only use 3 functions out of the entire program of photoshop. No one can't be bothered to straighten an image for me? Not to worry i use a tripod due to shakey hands. Adamdaley 10:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The idea is to teach people how to fix images themselves. You see, the volume of images here is so high that a few people couldn't possibly help with the editing; the Community therefore rely on the creators doing most of the work themselves. What I can tell you is that it's easier editing images in .RAW format; then you can run perspective correction and everything much easier.--Peulle 10:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Adam, first you do not move your nomination manually from the nomination space to CR. This is done by a Bot after your photo has been assessed and someone is disagreeing with that decision. Moving thing around like this messes with the archiving system for one thing. If you want to have a lengthy discussion about the photo, as you are prone to, you could do that on the reviewers talk page until you sort things out. Second, I explained to another user a while back how to remove CA using Photoshop or Gimp or similar programs, I will post a copy of that conversation on your talk page. I will also second what Peulle said, that while we do help each other for time to time, we are essentially resposible for fixing our own photos. --W.carter 11:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Someone else have a problem? Someone else want to pay me $5,000 AUD to retake this image again? So it's all image-perfect so it does get passed "Quality Image" passed? I'm an 3 inches away from packing it all in from the negativity you guys dish out. Adamdaley 11:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- We don't want you to retake it, we just want you to fix it. And we are trying to teach you how to do that. :) --W.carter 11:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- What Peulle suggested hasn't worked for me. Guess I'll stick with panorama images. Adamdaley 11:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Don't take this the wrong way, but you will encounter chromatic aberration in panoramas too. With digital photography, taking a very nice photo is just the first step. To make it a good photo and a QI you also need to be able to do what is known as post-processing of it and that includes some sort of image program. If you don't want to buy one, you can download GIMP for free. And don't worry, most of us knew nothing about all this when we first started here at Commons. QIC can be a real eye-opener and a start into more advanced photography. --W.carter 14:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot fix either the "chromatic aberration" or the "perspective (verticals)" as stated. I am not like those who can be "self taught" with websites and unfortunately, there are no courses here for Adobe Photoshop unlike a few years ago when I did my Introduction to Photography certificate in 2012. So whatever images I take will probably have something wrong with them, so does that discourage me from submitting them to here? Of course it does. I hardly get out of the house already because of my mental illness. So when I do submit an image, that means I've managed to actually get out into the "real world". Adamdaley 23:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- I saw on en-wiki that you have worked on history articles. Perhaps you could learn about post-processing photos if you read it in a book? There are a lot of those around. Here is one list for starters. --W.carter 23:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's right. Been over there since 2006. I've got dozens of books in two large plastic containers. Adamdaley 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- So if I cannot do these changes because of my hands, then how am I going to learn to fix them with the software? Sort of pointless of me putting them here to get them rejected because my hands won't co-operate with me. Oh well, you may as well close this. No point in having it open. Adamdaley 06:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Adamdaley, I should preface this by saying I am not at all knowledgeable about digital photo software, having done only some relatively rudimentary work on a very old copy of Photoshop. But if the issue is with your hands, it could be worth looking into voice-operated software. -- Ikan Kekek 10:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Someone else have a problem? Someone else want to pay me $5,000 AUD to retake this image again? So it's all image-perfect so it does get passed "Quality Image" passed? I'm an 3 inches away from packing it all in from the negativity you guys dish out. Adamdaley 11:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
OpposeI'm making the formal 'oppose' here so that this can be closed. The pic needs fixing and it doesn't look like it is going to be. I did give it a shot to see if I could fix it, but there is just too much CA on this rather large file and most of it did not go away with automated tools, fixing it manually would take forever, sorry. --W.carter 13:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)- Comment Just saw this and fixed what I could using global adjustments. Not sure if QI but I think it improves the image either way. --Julian Herzog 20:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Julian, you are a miracle worker getting rid of all that CA! This is good enough for me. Given that it is a large file, we should be generous when pixel peeping. Moving to Support. It can also be a good example for Adamdaley to see the difference we are talking about. --W.carter 21:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. I appreciate what you've done Julian Herzog. This correction is beyond my comprehension. Adamdaley 21:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't decided whether to vote on this, but Julian Herzog, could you explain what you did to Adamdaley? -- Ikan Kekek 22:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I understand, but to find it in Adobe Photoshop or to actually do it ... I cannot do. Simple as that. Adamdaley 23:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Sure. These are my settings in Lightroom 5: Screenshots. I don't own Photoshop, so I'm not sure exactly how you would do it there, but I presume similar settings exist there as well? --Julian Herzog 06:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I understand, but to find it in Adobe Photoshop or to actually do it ... I cannot do. Simple as that. Adamdaley 23:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't decided whether to vote on this, but Julian Herzog, could you explain what you did to Adamdaley? -- Ikan Kekek 22:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose COM:OVERCAT (fixable) + tower is blurred (unfortunately not fixable). Sorry. --A.Savin 12:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: I did what I could, have another look. Granted, detail which is not there can't be recovered. --Julian Herzog 14:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support now. Especially, when I compare it to the first version, that clearly could not have reached QI status. I'd like to see Julian Herzogs work bringing it to a good end. Greetings --Dirtsc 16:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Support, OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I found the CA section and I'm able to do it. On another note, the reason why I don't contribute to "assessing" the images here, is because why should I be critical of other people's images? Yes I have a certificate in photography ... where is your certificate in photography? I'm frustrated that people can just easily pass judgement without doing anything constructively to the images. Even when they know that user has not the means to improve it after the image is taken and uploaded to Commons. Adamdaley 22:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting (a) that all images nominated here should be automatically promoted, or (b) that anyone criticizing anything needs to know how to remedy the problem and volunteer their time to do that? The next time someone criticizes my flute playing, I will remember to ask them where they got a degree in flute playing and tell them that if they don't like my work, they should do it in my place, without getting paid. -- Ikan Kekek 03:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment This is only my opinion, concerning images promoted to "Quality Images" status. That I found a small percentage of them I feel shouldn't have been "Quality Image" rather "Valuable Image". And yes, if anyone wants to be critical or pass judgement they should know how to fix the problem even when the nominator doesn't know how to fix it. Or at least someone here knows how to fix it. If you do play the flute, then that's fine by me. Maybe, you could get a record deal if that's what you are passionate about. What is the comparison? Music and images? Hearing or seeing something, in this case it is the visual concept. Adamdaley 05:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- The comparison, which you apparently didn't get, is that you don't have to be a flute player to criticize the performance of a flute player, and you don't have to be a photographer or know how to correct the problems you see in order to criticize a photograph. If you don't like that, Commons isn't for you and you should restrict yourself to settings in which reviewers have to be photographers expert in digital photo processing software. But in real life, anyone can be a critic and many of the professional critics don't have skills you or I have but perhaps have degrees in writing. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- This page is for reviewing photos. It you think you have been treated unfairly or think that there is something wrong with the QIC process or Commons in general, please discuss this at the talk page, Village pump or Administrators' noticeboard. Thank you. --W.carter 08:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)