Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 02 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Friedhof_Hüthum_PM19-04A.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Friedhof Hüthum, different capture, rotated, cropped, zero compression this time, is this one better than Friedhof Hüthum PM19-04 ? --Pelikana 10:32, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I'm still not convinced, I dont see any striking difference. --PtrQs 00:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
     Support - I find the quality good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 07:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, burnt highlights in essential area. Other aspects (sharpness, colours, noise, lighting, composition) good. --Smial 11:06, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Smial.--Fischer.H 18:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Billy69150: You're still forgetting to execute the decision; when you change "QICtotal" to "QICresult", you must also change "Discuss" to "Decline", otherwise the bot will not act.--Peulle 13:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)