Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 01 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Oak tree on Quellweg in Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Johannes Brahms Promenade and the Parkhotel on Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hibernal alameda with lanterns and rambler roses on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wrocław Contemporary Museum 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint George church in Wilkanów 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haren-NL, church --Michielverbeek 21:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dieden-NL, windmill --Michielverbeek 21:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Demen-NL, church --Michielverbeek 21:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ravenstein-NL, windmill --Michielverbeek 21:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Veen-NL, windmill --Michielverbeek 21:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old cranes with lots of graffiti in San Francisco. --Dllu 20:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1. However I would have cut the cars left and right a bit more --Michielverbeek 21:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Mercedes-Benz W120 in rather poor condition. --Dllu 20:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brøndby Strand Church. --Bob Collowân 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agger Church. --Bob Collowân 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dredging Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) from Motor freighter Hector.
--Famberhorst 18:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Dredging Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen) from Motor freighter Hector.
-
- Nomination View of Ikaztegieta, Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Seems a little too much noise reduction, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
There's a slight tilt in ccw direction Poco a poco 18:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Done Sorry, you're right. --Basotxerri 19:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Elduain, church tower. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Berrobi. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country,Spain --Basotxerri 18:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frontón (Basque Pelota court) of Elduain. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elduain stream in Berrobi. Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 18:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the Arch of Septimius Severus, Forum romanum, Rome, Italy.--Jebulon 18:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings on the Malacca River - Duo Yun Xuan Auction House. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment A bit noisy, can you reduce it?--Peulle 17:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 17:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC) OK now.--Peulle 18:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tourist Information Centre. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malacca UMNO Museum. Malacca City, Malacca, Malaysia. --Halavar 16:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nicosia: Atatürk Square, Venetian Column --A.Savin 16:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Messerschmitt Me 262 B1-A D-IMTT 501244 replica at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 13:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Army 78+31 NHIndustries NH90 TTH and 84+99 Sikorsky CH-53G Super Stallion at ILA Berlin 2016. --Julian Herzog 13:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 14:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance of the outdoor pool Underberg-Bad in Rheinberg --Carschten 13:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rheinberg municipal park --Carschten 13:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le port de plaisance à coté du Môle Saint Louis à Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 10:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Phalacrocorax carbo (Great cormorant). --Christian Ferrer 10:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Ponte de la Pescaria at the Pescaria in Venice --Moroder 09:34, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch and Ponte de la Pescaria at the Pescaria fish market (Gothic Revival, 20th century) in Venice --Moroder 09:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Grand Canal in Venice. View from the Pescaria --Moroder 09:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Office and factory building in Stadshagen, Stockholm. --ArildV 08:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tabernacle picture on inscription base in Sand am Main --Ermell 08:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone column in Sand am Main --Ermell 08:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone column in Eltmann --Ermell 08:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Catholic parish church of St. Michael and John the Baptist in Eltmann --Ermell 08:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential project "Västermalms atrium" in Stadshagen, Stockholm. --ArildV 07:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Geometric weight, indented-patterned --Ercé 07:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality high enough for Q1, obvious and no shadows --Michielverbeek 07:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Geometric weight, indented-patterned --Ercé 07:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Thrapsano, Crete. --C messier 06:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Agies Paraskies, Crete. --C messier 06:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chania cathedral at dusk. --C messier 06:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Priouli fountain, Heraklion. --C messier 06:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lori Berd, Armenia --Poco a poco 07:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The stuff of poetry, and another potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matenadaran, Yerevan, Armenia --Poco a poco 07:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Akhtala Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 07:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geghard Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 07:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winners of 2017 Children's Courir de Mardi Gras for best costume in Church Point, Louisiana --WClarke 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality: too tight crop on the left, left top and the middle character is almost cropped out entirely. --Peulle 10:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fisherman on Inle Lake in Myanmar --Jakubhal 06:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of chinthe in a temple on Bagan Plain in Myanmar --Jakubhal 06:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guardian of the gate of Wat Arun Temple in Bangkok --Jakubhal 06:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markeliñe theatre in the show "Andante" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 06:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Trick Brothers in the show "Piggy Circus" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 06:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hiking of parking in power station Malga Mare to Lago Lungo (2553m).
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Hike from parking in central Malga Mare (1983m) to Lago del Careser (2603m) in the Parco nazionale dello Stelvio (Italy).
-
- Nomination Shahriar Alam is a famous politician from Bangladesh. By User:Porag61 --Masum-al-hasan 06:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Château de Sedan, Sedan, France --XRay 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Église Saint-Charles-Borromée, Sedan, France --XRay 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hôtel de ville, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basilique Notre Dame D'esperance in Mézières, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain in Charleville, Charleville-Mézières, France --XRay 06:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guest house «Hörmann» on Gaisrueckenstrasse #57 in Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quellweg with view of the restaurant "Zocklwirt", vulgo Rumasch, on the Gaisrueckenstrasse #77 in Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant "Zocklwirt", vulgo Rumasch, Gaisrueckenstrasse #77 in Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farmstead «Brock» (vulgo Brock) on Gaisrueckenstrasse #70 in Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Apple tree at an orchard on Am Kåte, Gaisrueckenstrasse, Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint George church in Wilkanów 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A pair of wild turkeys, Meleagris gallopavo, walking side by side by the side of Croy Road, near Uvas Canyon County Park in Morgan Hill, California. --Grendelkhan 19:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry it's unsharp (with Canon EF 70-300mm, 300mm is not a good idea, unfortunately). --A.Savin 15:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Actress of Les Anthropologues theatre in the show "Alice into the street" at 29. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 09:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose It's a close call but I end up voting to oppose this one; the bottom crop cuts off the hand and given the roomy top crop, there was clearly enough space to avoid it.--Peulle 15:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Note that the walls are not vertical for real --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Comment I think, despite non-vertical walls, it needs a perspective correction (see the edges) --A.Savin 14:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, I applied a bit more of perspective correction Poco a poco 18:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC) - Promotion OK for me (I guess it's the longest possible focal length for this motif and some distortions are inevitable) --A.Savin 15:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Note that the walls are not vertical for real --Poco a poco 07:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC) Comment I think, despite non-vertical walls, it needs a perspective correction (see the edges) --A.Savin 14:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hamburg, office building of the main church St. Michaelis --Dirtsc 16:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Oversharpened, excessive NR and some parts overexposed. I'm not sure if you can fix it, please try. I would also crop a bit on the left to get rid of the cut-off chimney. --Basotxerri 19:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment Please take a look at the new version. Greetings, --~~~~
Weak Support. --Basotxerri 20:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mausoleum of Hafez, Shiraz, Iran --Poco a poco 08:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very distorted and too tight cut at the bottom. -- Spurzem 12:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
New version Poco a poco 20:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The new version seems unnaturally hoisted and the crop is too tight now as before. Sorry. -- Spurzem 20:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I see it as a QI, if you disagree, please, decline it Poco a poco 22:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
As there is no reaction here, further opinions are welcome Poco a poco 10:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Tight crop of the bottom of the stairs as noted above, but the photo of the mausoleum is a QI. If anyone disagrees, they should feel free to take this to CR. -- Ikan Kekek 12:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Willie Mays Plaza at AT&T Park in San Francisco. --Dllu 06:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a bit of perspective adjustment, the buildings are not high enough for the "sky scraper perspective". --W.carter 20:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Done I've overwritten the file with a full perspective correction. The original straight-out-of-camera JPEG looks like this: [1]. Dllu 23:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
That's a lot of leaning... ;) Good quality now. This way you can enjoy the canopy that the trees provide. --W.carter 23:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) in Puerto Aldolfo López Mateos, Baja California Sur, México --Cvmontuy 14:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Purple fringes to be removed and too much empty space at the top. --C messier 12:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Empty spaced reduced and so the fringes, regards --Cvmontuy 03:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Not done The fringes are still there. --C messier 12:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Still Not done a week later.--Peulle 17:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gray whale calf, Puerto Adolfo López Mateos, Baja California, México --Cvmontuy 04:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Quite noisy (or just oversharpened). --C messier 11:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC) Not done, and why ISO 900. You don't need 1/2000 for whales. Sorry not a QI imo.--ArildV 08:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Waymo_self-driving_car_side_view.gk.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Waymo self-driving car on the road in Mountain View, making a left turn. (Side view.) --Grendelkhan 23:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Blurred --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please reconsider; the object is in motion but relatively sharp, similar to File:Motor cycle stunt2 amk.jpg, which fits the QI guidelines. --Grendelkhan 07:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Comparing a slow-moving autonomobile to a fast-moving motorcycle doesn't work for me.--Peulle 10:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Peulle 14:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Nuévalos,_Zaragoza,_España,_2017-01-07,_DD_02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Nuévalos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 16:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I saw some strong red/pink CAs on the left, that need to be removed. Also, it would be good to add some sharpness. --Halavar 14:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- I wouldn call it "strong" if you keep an eye on the file size. New version uploaded Poco a poco 17:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Large, good picture with a bit of unsharpness on near the left and right margins. A lot of smaller pictures that are slightly unsharp throughout the entire picture are routinely promoted, and I think everyone can think of plenty examples of that. -- Ikan Kekek 05:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support Ok, good now. QI for me --Halavar 10:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 14:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Mallnitz_Altes_Tauernhaus_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Altes Tauernhaus (2,380 metres (7,810 ft)) in the Tauern Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia --Uoaei1 22:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose sorry, but not sharp enough --PtrQs 03:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- New version available, lets discuss --Uoaei1 05:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support IMHO sharp enough for good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support--Moroder 15:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg 19:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question -- and how do we read the QI-guidelines [2]: 'Images should not be downsampled (sized down in order to appear of better quality).' Here it was 17 -> 9,5 MB --PtrQs (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I think this is a valid discussion. PtrQs quoted accurately. So since the image guidelines are actually not enforced to the letter, what is the operative standard, and should this guideline be edited accordingly? -- Ikan Kekek 07:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It's an issue, yes. I usually use that rule if an image has lower resolution than this, and/or if the quality seems questionable. The typical case is an image that has not been cropped or taken with a zoom lens, but has been shot with a high res camera and has been downsampled to just above the 2MP limit.--Peulle 13:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment IMO these guidelines should not be adapted to generally accepted low standards. I feel that there are more than a few QIs that I would rank near the limit of sharpness. But especially for those, where even a downsizing does not result in an acceptable quality, we should be able to quote this guideline. --PtrQs 18:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not really understanding this discussion. What I see is that there are sharpness issues in the previous version of this photo at full size, and that there are still some questions about the sharpness of this version at full size. In particular, the roof is a bit questionable to me without "pixel-peeping". If there were no question of downsizing, though, I'd probably just not vote. I will Oppose, and I'd like anyone to explain why it's fine to downsize this image. -- Ikan Kekek 03:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I miss detail on the grass. --A.Savin 14:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I have seen both versions now and I don't see any compelling problems with the first version's size; the resizing seems to be done to make it appear sharper. Sharpening of the original image could work without reducing the size.--Peulle 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Question @PtrQs, Ikan Kekek, A.Savin, and Peulle: Dear opposers, I really do not understand how an image where you can read a text that is about 10 pixels high and about 2 pixels wide (see the hiking signs) could possibly be unsharp or show any lack of detail?! Regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Well, it looks to me like the part of the roof facing us is a bit questionable, and A.Savin mentioned the grass. But I think the main objection is to your having downsampled. -- Ikan Kekek 21:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment IMO, has nothing to do with the number of pixels. I don't know what happened, but the grass is totally unsharp and looks like painted with a brush. Of course both in the first and the latest version, because downsampling does not add fine detail. --A.Savin 05:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 14:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Haus-Nordfassade,_2017,_Oetztaler_Str._23,_München.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Modern residental house in Munich --Lucasbosch 10:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. I can´t understand the composition. Too much sky and only a part of the building? --Milseburg 20:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support The composition is certainly strange, with the slanty building and the plane looking as if it's diving headlong into its side, but weird doesn't mean bad quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop doesn't fit to the description. --Palauenc05 21:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Why not? We see part of the facade. -- Ikan Kekek 00:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Milseburg Poco a poco 07:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 14:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)