Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 30 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Village_Square_North_Campus_IIT_Mandi_Himachal_Jan20_D72_13746.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Village Square, IIT Mandi, from Griffon Peak. --Tagooty 04:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Buildings are blurred and some parts are overexposed --Jakubhal 06:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I request other opinions. To get the "bird's eye view", this was taken from a peak 2.5 km distant and 600m higher. The roofs are made of light-coloured reflective materials for solar insulation. See this image for perspective. --Tagooty 03:10, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I get it, but I think the results are too unsharp for this to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. It doesn't look to me like the photographer made any fundamental mistakes in creating this photo. Some double contours suggest a slight motion blur, possibly caused by mirror movement. Overall, the blur increases towards the edges of the image. The performance of the lens has probably simply been exhausted, which is of course much more noticeable with architectural photos than with other, less critical motifs. Since the composition, the colours, the lighting are otherwise good and a print up to A4 size is still usable, I support the photo despite a few shortcomings. --Smial (talk) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
  •  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. Nefronus 07:59, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Malachite (Siproeta stelenes) (5).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Malachite (Siproeta stelenes) in the butterfly garden in Hunawihr (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support There's a blown area on one leaf, but the butterfly is quite sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose As Ikan Mentioned + I think the detail on the wings is somewhat poor (noise reduction?). Borderline quality at most for me, sorry. --Nefronus 19:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support per Ikan. --Smial 12:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Question downsized? Gzen92 Charlesjsharp 09:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Panorama_from_the_Chike-Taman_pass_in_the_north_direction.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Panorama from the Chike-Taman pass in the north direction. Ongudaysky district, Altai. Russia --Александр Байдуков 03:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The detail looks posterized, sorry + the tree with the ribbons is distracting imo. --Nefronus 07:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Posterised? Big word --Moroder 02:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
     Comment See e.g. the stones right of the road, at 100% they look like monochrome patches. Nefronus 05:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Also somewhat overprocessed, but not as disturbant as in the other image I declined. Regarding the resolution good enough. --Smial 12:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Smial --Commonists 17:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)