Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 27 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Stained glass window in the Saint Felix Church in Laissac 02.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Stained glass window in the Saint Felix Church in Laissac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:11, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 06:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too unsharp, remapped highlights, 1/4000s and ISO 25600 for a static object? --C messier 14:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per C messier --Uoaei1 09:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per C messier --Cvmontuy 15:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Ruta_de_las_Caras,_Cuenca,_España,_2017-01-03,_DD_62.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ruta de las Caras, Cuenca, Spain --Poco a poco 14:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Interesting object, but Sorry no, this is unsharp at full size.--Jebulon 14:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Poco a poco 16:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
May I then ask for further opinions on this one? --Poco a poco 18:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment First version lacks some DOF, foreground ("97") looks ok, "eyes" of the figure somewhat unsharp, second version looks oversharpened after downscaling. No vote, because I would prefer the hires version despite slight unsharpness on the head and some grainyness in the background. --Smial 09:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support, the head itself seems quite sharp to me. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Per Basotxerri  Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 04:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 16:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Looshaus_Michaelerplatz.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Looshaus, Vienna --Thomas Ledl 06:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Good composition, verticals are straight. However bottom crop is not well done, please turn your camera if you envolved peope in the image. I also think the sky is too noisy. Sorry, but no Q1 for me --Michielverbeek 07:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Removed people. More bottom. Sky noise reduction. Ok now? --Thomas Ledl 18:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
People are still there. It might help if you use F5. Btw, it is looking better --Michielverbeek 06:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Fine, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - good image this is one of the places you'll get away people only by some malicious announcement. --Herzi Pinki 09:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Herzi Pinki.--Manfred Kuzel 05:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Sorry, I was not patient enough --Michielverbeek 07:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Michielverbeek, it looks like you need to cross out your oppose vote above, because right now, you're both opposing and supporting. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 11:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Yes, --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:03, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is a strange band on sky top right apparently added on postprocessing --Cvmontuy 12:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As per Cvmontuy, must be corrected. --Basotxerri 15:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Herzi Pinki. -- Johann Jaritz 16:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Stitching problem, see image note. --Tsungam 07:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Tsungam.--Ermell 08:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Actually, the band is at the top of the sky and extends across most of the photo. Sorry for somehow missing that. -- Ikan Kekek 11:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Just fix the sky band and stitchig issues and your picture will get promoted --Cvmontuy 15:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose post-processing issue in the sky, and per Tsungam regarding the left border. Easily correctible.--Jebulon 21:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 6 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 16:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC) (feel free to re-nominate image once stitching has been fixed)