Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 25 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Chiesa_del_Carmine_Altare_navata_barocco_destra_Brescia.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Altar in the right nave of the Santa Maria del Carmine church. --Moroder 14:09, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 14:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose It was certainly taken the best it could, but the perspective feels strange to me. Also the windows are blown (pinkish tint between the glass) + there’s a violet tint gradient at the top of the image. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 19:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose. Per Nefronus--Lmbuga 22:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I'm OK with the perspective, but please edit out the CA. -- Ikan Kekek 16:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Valley_Of_Narzan_Долина_Нарзанов_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Valley Of Narzan. At the confluence of the Khasaut river in the Malka river, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria --AlixSaz 16:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Misty/undefined mts in the background, sorry. --Nefronus 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support Haze can be a terrible problem but in this case its gradation from horizon to foreground is an asset. Rodhullandemu 15:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. -- Ikan Kekek 16:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Haze looks natural. --Tagooty 05:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 22:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Valley_Of_Narzan_Долина_Нарзанов.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Valley Of Narzan. At the confluence of the Khasaut river in the Malka river, Zolsky district, Kabardino-Balkaria --AlixSaz 16:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Misty/undefined mts in the background, sorry. --Nefronus 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
     Support Haze can be a terrible problem but in this case its gradation from horizon to foreground is an asset. Rodhullandemu 15:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very similar to the previous image. The addition of shrubbery in the foreground is distracting, emphasises the soft focus of the rest of the scene. --Tagooty 05:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

File:CRH380BG-5821@IFP_(20210126143531).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A China Railways CRH380BG leaving Beijing Chaoyang Railway Station (by N509FZ) --廣九直通車 07:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Please check the verticals. --Ermell 08:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done --Nefronus 07:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  SupportThe main subject is the highspeed-train. Good quality for me. --Steindy (talk) 13:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Don't mind the verticals but the whole image is pretty blurry, f/2,8 isn't a good choice for this kind of picture. Selbymay 10:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 22:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)